Redian新闻
>
When blind leads blind, all blind. arrogance brings out arroganc

When blind leads blind, all blind. arrogance brings out arroganc

博客
When blind leads blind, all blind. arrogance brings out arrogance. 
** 
FULL ACCESS
EDIediTORIAL

Earning respect and trust

SCIENCE
1 Feb 2024
Vol 383Issue 6682
p. 463
 
 
 
PHOTO: CAMERON DAVIDSON
Respect for, and trust in, science may be at an all-time low. In the United States, a 2023 Pew Research poll showed that only 57% of the population believed science has had a positive impact on society, and a Gallup poll showed that confidence in higher education was down to 36%. If the Gallup poll were done now, support would likely be even lower, given recent events with university presidents, from questions about their research integrity to their explanations for policies on student speech. I’m frequently asked what can be done about all of this, especially in the realm of science. Many scientists think the challenge has largely to do with science communication, which is certainly important. But first, the scientific community must begin to conduct itself in the same manner that it is asking of the public, and that means treating everyone in the scientific community with respect.
As Editor-in-Chief of the Science family of journals, I work with a highly skilled staff in scientific publishing. The professional editors are scholars in their fields and intensely dedicated to the goal of a robust scientific record. In addition, the visuals experts produce striking and educational imagery; the social media crew runs widely subscribed accounts; gifted news reporters provide outstanding global coverage; and a sharp communications team spreads the message far and wide. Plenty of scientists recognize the importance of all of this.
But far too often, I see my colleagues at the journals treated disrespectfully by authors, reviewers, and readers who consider running a research lab as somehow more meaningful than anything else in science. This is simply ludicrous. If anything, the challenges that science is experiencing now are not due to a lack of success in the laboratory. They are due to a lack of emphasis on other aspects of science—great teaching; communicating; policy-making; and performing the hard intellectual labor of choosing, from the mass of research, those discoveries that deserve publication in a top journal—and then working with authors to make the findings publishable. The notion that lab work is the only purposeful endeavor in science is obtuse and is an example of precisely what leads to the view that scientists are intellectual elites who do not value the contributions or abilities of anyone except themselves and the small group they deign to recognize as their peers. Every time this academic hauteur is revealed to the public, confidence is lost for a simple reason—scientists like these are not inspiring the people’s trust.
When I was a university administrator, I was frequently visited by graduate students who were in distress after they had informed their adviser that they did not intend to pursue an academic research career. Suddenly, their adviser became less interested in them. I was dismayed by faculty who had apparently forgotten that they worked at a school, where helping students achieve success in the life that they choose is the goal. Academic researchers should be excited for students who want to contribute to scientific publishing, education, policy, and other endeavors where science needs much more help than it does in producing more grants and papers.
Nowhere is this elitism more apparent than in the behavior I sometimes see from academics toward the staff at Science’s journals. Many seem to think that having highly cited work and membership in exclusive academies gives them license to be dismissive of others. This is pure arrogance and ignorance. Professional editors are scientists who are highly capable and trained to handle papers. Too often, an editor’s decisions are attacked as thoughtless output from an underling rather than insightful determinations from a true colleague. I have worked with both excellent academic departments and with outstanding professional editors, and talking science in both environments is equally stimulating and challenging. Furthermore, the people who handle the visual, communication, and technical details do important things that no researcher can. As it turns out, these individuals are not just among the most capable people in scientific publishing, they’re among the most capable people in the enterprise of science.
The way to restore trust in science and higher education is by earning it. Let’s start by recognizing everyone within the scientific community as peers in the scientific quest.
戳这里 Claim your page
来源: 文学城-TJKCB
相关阅读
历史车轮大提速,百年会有王者兴希腊罗德岛(Rhodes),舞动的天空个人感慨之七十 习家帮宾州Willows park,水中倒影日本拚布再流行,山口百恵成拥趸时光里的答案(一百十)APAD: It will all come out in the washLet Sleeping Kids Lie, Hangzhou School District Announces78、长篇民国小说《永泰里》第十六章 生死一线(2)儿子网球校队try out, 遇到cheating的对手。界内的球他说是出界,分数也多算他一分。儿子一向不喜欢冲突,场上The ‘Invisible’ Cleaners Keeping the Cities SpotlessBREAKING: Ron DeSantis drops out of 2024 presidential race个人感慨之六十九 松坡将军应该说what kind of还是what kinds of?Out of TexasThe Shanghai Temple Offering Noodles for the Soul6063 血壮山河之随枣会战 第三章 17APAD: In the country of the blind, the oneCan This Café Help People With Autism Find Acceptance in China?《一路走来的宇宙 01》【美坛综艺秀假日篇】《My Love Mine All Mine》by Mitski家居修理系列:卖房要略(2)金玉其外个人感慨之六十八 宪政教育;学习;评价标准;相信未来In Northeast China, Tourists From the South Spark a Winter Boom童年故事(9):吊棒果下戏水忙White Hat, Black Hat: Bringing Hackers Out of the ShadowsAPAD: "Out of sight out of mind"APAD: A Sunday well spent brings a week of contentLife in the Background: The Extras Who Became Viral Stars小资投资者宇文通凡的开心生活存内计算芯片:What?When?Where?《大炮、病菌和一场春梦》(25) 那一年的记忆,除了战争和瘟疫,还有我做的春梦“动物庄园”印证中国教育的彻底沉沦APAD:Never say mean words out of anger. Happy Easter!hé bàng?hé bèng?Huawei rolls out ultrafast EV chargers in China, taking on T腰占铁索桥《跌宕起伏心灵煎熬的14天》(5) 【寻找证据】《十七帖》读议(四)
logo
联系我们隐私协议©2024 redian.news
Redian新闻
Redian.news刊载任何文章,不代表同意其说法或描述,仅为提供更多信息,也不构成任何建议。文章信息的合法性及真实性由其作者负责,与Redian.news及其运营公司无关。欢迎投稿,如发现稿件侵权,或作者不愿在本网发表文章,请版权拥有者通知本网处理。