O-1申请contribution 和 authorship 被RFE,求助# Immigration - 落地生根
t*p
1 楼
Original Contributions: The record reflects that the beneficiary has:
1.Worked as a researcher and scientist in the field of mechanical
engineering.
2.Skills, knowledge experience, and in the field of mechanical engineering.
However，you have not provided sufficient evidence to establish:
1. What the beneficiary's original scientific, scholarly, or business-
related contributions are
2. Why the beneficiary's contributions are original; and/or
3. Why the beneficiary's contributions are of major significance in the
field.
Please submit additional evidence to establish how the beneficiary's
contributions are considered original and are contributions of major
significance in field of mechanical engineering.
这个我能想到的就是再要推荐信？
Authorship:
To establish eligibility under this criterion, the research must be shown to
have affected the field in a way that sets the beneficiary above others in
the field, or is otherwise indicative of national or international acclaim.
Objective evidence, such as the citation of the beneficiary’s work by
others, may satisfy the requirement for extensive documentation of
extraordinary ability.
The record reflects that the beneficiary has authored two articles in
professional journals and two other papers. However, you have not provided
sufficient evidence of the beneficiary’s authorship of scholarly articles
in the field of mechanical engineering in professional journals, or other
major media.
Moreover, it is expected that researchers will publish articles discussing
their research. It does not follow that all researchers who publish articles
in peer-reviewed journals enjoys sustained acclaim in their field. The
record does not reflect that the beneficiary’s articles or papers have been
extensively cited by others in the field of mechanical engineering. Also,
you have not provided sufficient evidence to establish that the beneficiary
enjoys a measure of influence in the field of mechanical engineering through
his publications. The material you submitted does not distinguish the
beneficiary from other engineers, researchers, or scientists in his field.
Please provide evidence of the beneficiary’s authorship of scholarly
articles in the field, in professional journals, or other major media. Also,
please provide evidence to establish the significance and importance of the
beneficiary’s scholarly articles in the field. Additionally please provide
evidence to establish the significance and importance of the professional
journals or other major media that have punished the beneficiary’s
scholarly articles. Indicate if the publication has local, national, or
international circulation, How often it is printed, and the number of copies
printed.
本人3篇第一作者的文章，claim authorship这一项的时候只是列出了几个杂志的名字
，没有具体说明每个杂志的重要性。 文章没有引用，杂志也是一般般.
1.Worked as a researcher and scientist in the field of mechanical
engineering.
2.Skills, knowledge experience, and in the field of mechanical engineering.
However，you have not provided sufficient evidence to establish:
1. What the beneficiary's original scientific, scholarly, or business-
related contributions are
2. Why the beneficiary's contributions are original; and/or
3. Why the beneficiary's contributions are of major significance in the
field.
Please submit additional evidence to establish how the beneficiary's
contributions are considered original and are contributions of major
significance in field of mechanical engineering.
这个我能想到的就是再要推荐信？
Authorship:
To establish eligibility under this criterion, the research must be shown to
have affected the field in a way that sets the beneficiary above others in
the field, or is otherwise indicative of national or international acclaim.
Objective evidence, such as the citation of the beneficiary’s work by
others, may satisfy the requirement for extensive documentation of
extraordinary ability.
The record reflects that the beneficiary has authored two articles in
professional journals and two other papers. However, you have not provided
sufficient evidence of the beneficiary’s authorship of scholarly articles
in the field of mechanical engineering in professional journals, or other
major media.
Moreover, it is expected that researchers will publish articles discussing
their research. It does not follow that all researchers who publish articles
in peer-reviewed journals enjoys sustained acclaim in their field. The
record does not reflect that the beneficiary’s articles or papers have been
extensively cited by others in the field of mechanical engineering. Also,
you have not provided sufficient evidence to establish that the beneficiary
enjoys a measure of influence in the field of mechanical engineering through
his publications. The material you submitted does not distinguish the
beneficiary from other engineers, researchers, or scientists in his field.
Please provide evidence of the beneficiary’s authorship of scholarly
articles in the field, in professional journals, or other major media. Also,
please provide evidence to establish the significance and importance of the
beneficiary’s scholarly articles in the field. Additionally please provide
evidence to establish the significance and importance of the professional
journals or other major media that have punished the beneficiary’s
scholarly articles. Indicate if the publication has local, national, or
international circulation, How often it is printed, and the number of copies
printed.
本人3篇第一作者的文章，claim authorship这一项的时候只是列出了几个杂志的名字
，没有具体说明每个杂志的重要性。 文章没有引用，杂志也是一般般.
