NSC EB1b, NOID, please help# Immigration - 落地生根
c*a
1 楼
刚知道结果,麻烦各位好心人帮一下忙。我的基本情况入下
【方向】EE signal processing
【论文】11 journal (三篇国内写的) + 15 conference, 全部是一作
【推荐人】 3 US + 1 canada + 1 german + 1 italy
【专利申请】 4个
【TPC Member】2个
【conference session chair】 1个
【best student paper】 1个
【审稿】 50+, 超过一半是给很不错的journal申的
【引用】 70+, 44个他引
claim了老三样,结果被0214全否了。律师建议找Editor-in-chief 与 conference
chair 写信重新阐述review。但是citation怎么处理,她好像并不清楚。Citation应该
如果回复?过来人麻烦给个意见
“The record shows that the alien has been an active reviewer for journa XXX
, XXX, and XXX, et al. and was part of technical program committee of the
XXX and XXX conference and other programs. The record further shows that the
alien has publications in journals XXX, XXX, et al. The aftermentioned
accomplishments reflect the activities of a productive scholar active in his
field but alone hardly meet the level of the E12 classification”
"The record shows that the alien was awarded for the best student paper by
IEEE; however, this certainly does not meet this criterion" 其实律师并没有单
独claim,只是用在contribution里面。
“The record further shows that the alien has letters of support, citations
in Google scholar, and 4 patent applications. The petitioner submitted a
copy of the alien's profile on Google Scholar, suggesting that the alien has
76 citations of his publications. However, having subtracted the alien's
self-citations, USCIS recognizes only 44, a number that does not meet the
minimum requirement for the E12 classification. Though the letters of
support discuss his contributions in the academic field, the number of
independent citations of his publications is not indicative of demonstrable
influence on the field as a whole. USCIS considers the number of citations
as a very important factor in determining the alien's contribution to the
academic field. Finally, the petitioner submitted no evidence to demonstrate
how the alien's 4 patents contributed to his field.”
大家帮忙看一下怎么回复,因为是PP时间很紧。如果哪位好新人有模板,能否发一份,
万分感谢!!!!
【方向】EE signal processing
【论文】11 journal (三篇国内写的) + 15 conference, 全部是一作
【推荐人】 3 US + 1 canada + 1 german + 1 italy
【专利申请】 4个
【TPC Member】2个
【conference session chair】 1个
【best student paper】 1个
【审稿】 50+, 超过一半是给很不错的journal申的
【引用】 70+, 44个他引
claim了老三样,结果被0214全否了。律师建议找Editor-in-chief 与 conference
chair 写信重新阐述review。但是citation怎么处理,她好像并不清楚。Citation应该
如果回复?过来人麻烦给个意见
“The record shows that the alien has been an active reviewer for journa XXX
, XXX, and XXX, et al. and was part of technical program committee of the
XXX and XXX conference and other programs. The record further shows that the
alien has publications in journals XXX, XXX, et al. The aftermentioned
accomplishments reflect the activities of a productive scholar active in his
field but alone hardly meet the level of the E12 classification”
"The record shows that the alien was awarded for the best student paper by
IEEE; however, this certainly does not meet this criterion" 其实律师并没有单
独claim,只是用在contribution里面。
“The record further shows that the alien has letters of support, citations
in Google scholar, and 4 patent applications. The petitioner submitted a
copy of the alien's profile on Google Scholar, suggesting that the alien has
76 citations of his publications. However, having subtracted the alien's
self-citations, USCIS recognizes only 44, a number that does not meet the
minimum requirement for the E12 classification. Though the letters of
support discuss his contributions in the academic field, the number of
independent citations of his publications is not indicative of demonstrable
influence on the field as a whole. USCIS considers the number of citations
as a very important factor in determining the alien's contribution to the
academic field. Finally, the petitioner submitted no evidence to demonstrate
how the alien's 4 patents contributed to his field.”
大家帮忙看一下怎么回复,因为是PP时间很紧。如果哪位好新人有模板,能否发一份,
万分感谢!!!!