x*6
2 楼
副申请人需要出示Employment Letter吗?
O*3
3 楼
开什么玩笑,副申请人很多是还穿着开档裤呢。
x*6
4 楼
但是网上有这样一篇文章
http://www.cilawgroup.com/news/2013/06/18/uscis-issues-numerous
"Derivative Dependents Issued Identical RFEs
What is somewhat troubling is that USCIS has issued RFEs with identical
language to derivative dependents. Specifically, dependents’ RFEs
include the phrase “You are an Employment-Based Principal Applicant” which
is plainly incorrect for derivative beneficiaries.
Also, the RFE for derivatives asks for evidence in the same two areas as
primary applicants without any consideration that such documents or
information may not be applicable for derivative family member applicants.
For example, a derivative applicant’s RFE asks for proof of continued
employment authorization since the filing of I-485. Many derivative
applicants, especially children, do not seek and obtain EAD work permits as
part of their I-485 application. In fact, whether or not a derivative
applicant is employed (unless on status permitting employment such as H-1B
or L-1), is not a factor in the I-485 adjudication.
The RFE for derivative applicants also asks for a letter from “your
petitioning (Form I-140) employer.” Derivative I-485 applicants, by
definition, do not have a petitioning I-140 sponsor employer. It is
unclear what is USCIS’s motive — whether they seek such a letter from the
primary applicant’s sponsoring employer, or simply that they reused the
template without regard to a specific case’s parameters."
http://www.cilawgroup.com/news/2013/06/18/uscis-issues-numerous
"Derivative Dependents Issued Identical RFEs
What is somewhat troubling is that USCIS has issued RFEs with identical
language to derivative dependents. Specifically, dependents’ RFEs
include the phrase “You are an Employment-Based Principal Applicant” which
is plainly incorrect for derivative beneficiaries.
Also, the RFE for derivatives asks for evidence in the same two areas as
primary applicants without any consideration that such documents or
information may not be applicable for derivative family member applicants.
For example, a derivative applicant’s RFE asks for proof of continued
employment authorization since the filing of I-485. Many derivative
applicants, especially children, do not seek and obtain EAD work permits as
part of their I-485 application. In fact, whether or not a derivative
applicant is employed (unless on status permitting employment such as H-1B
or L-1), is not a factor in the I-485 adjudication.
The RFE for derivative applicants also asks for a letter from “your
petitioning (Form I-140) employer.” Derivative I-485 applicants, by
definition, do not have a petitioning I-140 sponsor employer. It is
unclear what is USCIS’s motive — whether they seek such a letter from the
primary applicant’s sponsoring employer, or simply that they reused the
template without regard to a specific case’s parameters."
相关阅读
急问,体检表要附血检报告吗?不知道打指纹的人是否能影响进度EB1b 140支票cash了,没有收到letter推荐信用 现在时态 好吗?CS引用少EB1B求评估EB1B material acceptance, pp了,求祝福是不是绿卡到手了, 就可以辞职了。老中咋素质这么低呢请问一定要打了指纹,才会办combo卡和绿卡吗?旱的旱死,涝的涝死Efile I140的链接是哪个?才发现去年年底回国i94没上缴485被RFE了,求bless。。。NSC EB1A 140求祝福感谢大蜜 感谢大家! 完整timeline为LD的waiver求bless(只有10来个包子)求祝福:I485 RFE信一直没收到,谢谢了。求推荐Boston周边律师,办理EB1A 的再次提交。Web of Science生成的Citation Report和ResearcherID里的引用次数不一致I-485主申请人交上去了 副申请人拿到工作offer