EB1B NSC NOID求助!# Immigration - 落地生根
c*n
1 楼
大家好,我上周申请EB1B(pp),结果前天刚收到学校律师邮件,说case被NOID了。所以
帖上来给大家汇报一下,顺便听听大家的意见。下面是基本情况:
Timeline
I-140
RD: 04/16/2015
NOID:04/22/2015
VO:0214
背景:
大学ap
paper: 18 journal, 1 conference proceeding, 其中9篇一作。因为专业原因,IF平
均都比较低
Citation: 提交的时候有130,他引80左右;今天又查了一下,他引已经涨到110左右
Review: 18次
RL:7封,全是independent,其中美国5封,加拿大1封,英国1封
去年感恩节左右开始准备eb1b材料,请的学校律师。结果那大姐除了membership外全都
给我 claim了,现在想起来是一大失误,后悔没有仔细看前辈们的经验啊。因为lp急着
要身份,所以直接上了pp。
23号收到律师的email,说被NOID了,VO是0214,其中claim的同意了四项,prize/
awards没有同意。Final Merits Analysis中主要对review, publication,以及
contribution批的比较大,觉得review只是a routine process in the field relying
on many scientists。在contribution方面,觉得'the alien's scientific or
scholarly
research contributions to the academic must be demonstrated by preexisting,
independent, and objective evidence.'看来是我的RLs没有写好。另外在
contribution方面,强调了independent citations的重要性,可能是觉得我的他引不
够多。最后的总结就是'Although the evidence of record shows that the alien
meets the plain language of 4 regulatory criteria, he is not very strong in
any; moreover, the evidence does not establish that the alien's original
research has contributed significantly to the field as a whole.'
学校的律师觉得‘this particular examiner has made up his/her mind on this
case and it would be very difficult to change his/her mind‘, 建议withdraw
然后等几个月之后再resubmit一次,但我内心还是倾向于repeal一下。所以想上来问一
下大牛们和过来人的意见,这个case还值得repeal吗?或者有没有什么更好的建议?多
谢啦!
帖上来给大家汇报一下,顺便听听大家的意见。下面是基本情况:
Timeline
I-140
RD: 04/16/2015
NOID:04/22/2015
VO:0214
背景:
大学ap
paper: 18 journal, 1 conference proceeding, 其中9篇一作。因为专业原因,IF平
均都比较低
Citation: 提交的时候有130,他引80左右;今天又查了一下,他引已经涨到110左右
Review: 18次
RL:7封,全是independent,其中美国5封,加拿大1封,英国1封
去年感恩节左右开始准备eb1b材料,请的学校律师。结果那大姐除了membership外全都
给我 claim了,现在想起来是一大失误,后悔没有仔细看前辈们的经验啊。因为lp急着
要身份,所以直接上了pp。
23号收到律师的email,说被NOID了,VO是0214,其中claim的同意了四项,prize/
awards没有同意。Final Merits Analysis中主要对review, publication,以及
contribution批的比较大,觉得review只是a routine process in the field relying
on many scientists。在contribution方面,觉得'the alien's scientific or
scholarly
research contributions to the academic must be demonstrated by preexisting,
independent, and objective evidence.'看来是我的RLs没有写好。另外在
contribution方面,强调了independent citations的重要性,可能是觉得我的他引不
够多。最后的总结就是'Although the evidence of record shows that the alien
meets the plain language of 4 regulatory criteria, he is not very strong in
any; moreover, the evidence does not establish that the alien's original
research has contributed significantly to the field as a whole.'
学校的律师觉得‘this particular examiner has made up his/her mind on this
case and it would be very difficult to change his/her mind‘, 建议withdraw
然后等几个月之后再resubmit一次,但我内心还是倾向于repeal一下。所以想上来问一
下大牛们和过来人的意见,这个case还值得repeal吗?或者有没有什么更好的建议?多
谢啦!