z*u
2 楼
找了很久才弄到第一个on site. 希望周一能有好的发挥
g*6
3 楼
第一次review通过,contribution被否,
递交RFE回复的时候,大家还递交了新的review证据吗?
这个不算数,递交上去了有害处没有啊?
递交RFE回复的时候,大家还递交了新的review证据吗?
这个不算数,递交上去了有害处没有啊?
t*r
4 楼
今天去Home DEPOT买的ZEP HEAVY-DUTY OVEN & GRILL CLEANER.
回家用用后, 发现不是特别好使, 气味还挺大~~~
回家用用后, 发现不是特别好使, 气味还挺大~~~
h*e
5 楼
【 以下文字转载自 Military 讨论区 】
发信人: xmdxx1182 (卡西莫多), 信区: Military
标 题: Re: 图灵奖获得者姚期智亲自给状元打电话招生--- 牛叉!
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Thu Jun 30 13:09:45 2011, 美东)
mit上发帖,性版征ONS
发信人: xmdxx1182 (卡西莫多), 信区: Military
标 题: Re: 图灵奖获得者姚期智亲自给状元打电话招生--- 牛叉!
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Thu Jun 30 13:09:45 2011, 美东)
mit上发帖,性版征ONS
m*t
7 楼
Bless!
H*7
8 楼
祝福!
r*c
10 楼
能不解散嘛,老抄别人的
e*r
12 楼
what's "contribution被否"??
can you share yours?
can you share yours?
t*r
13 楼
啥? 能说清楚一点吗? 不太懂
a*n
17 楼
review应该也可部分算作contribution吧?
R*d
20 楼
Big Bless
m*w
21 楼
It depends. If the IO said "This criteria has been met", you are not
required to do anything. But sometime for the review part the IO may say "(
the evidence) has met the plain language of the regulation".In this case it
actually means that you didn't pass. You have to submit further evidence to
claim that you not only have judged others' work but also are within the top
small percentage of all reviewers.
Either way, to submit more material on journal/conference reviewing would be
a smart choice, as it will definitely strengthen your totality.
required to do anything. But sometime for the review part the IO may say "(
the evidence) has met the plain language of the regulation".In this case it
actually means that you didn't pass. You have to submit further evidence to
claim that you not only have judged others' work but also are within the top
small percentage of all reviewers.
Either way, to submit more material on journal/conference reviewing would be
a smart choice, as it will definitely strengthen your totality.
b*c
22 楼
super bless
g*6
25 楼
Many Thanks for detailed information.Very helpful!
it
to
top
be
【在 m****w 的大作中提到】
: It depends. If the IO said "This criteria has been met", you are not
: required to do anything. But sometime for the review part the IO may say "(
: the evidence) has met the plain language of the regulation".In this case it
: actually means that you didn't pass. You have to submit further evidence to
: claim that you not only have judged others' work but also are within the top
: small percentage of all reviewers.
: Either way, to submit more material on journal/conference reviewing would be
: a smart choice, as it will definitely strengthen your totality.
it
to
top
be
【在 m****w 的大作中提到】
: It depends. If the IO said "This criteria has been met", you are not
: required to do anything. But sometime for the review part the IO may say "(
: the evidence) has met the plain language of the regulation".In this case it
: actually means that you didn't pass. You have to submit further evidence to
: claim that you not only have judged others' work but also are within the top
: small percentage of all reviewers.
: Either way, to submit more material on journal/conference reviewing would be
: a smart choice, as it will definitely strengthen your totality.
h*n
27 楼
bless
c*y
28 楼
bless
j*x
29 楼
祝福!
w*a
30 楼
bless!
D*e
31 楼
bless
f*g
32 楼
BLESS!!!
m*u
33 楼
bless
相关阅读