6s解决破音 - 未名空间MITBBS历史存档

国际科技财经博客移民网络热点娱乐民生时事公众号

Redian新闻

>未名空间

>PDA - 掌中宝

6s解决破音

6s解决破音# PDA - 掌中宝

o*e2015-10-08 07:10

1 楼

【以下文字转载自 SanFrancisco 讨论区】
发信人: onetiemyshoe (onetiemyshoe), 信区: SanFrancisco
标题: 红帽子烙印解释为什么patch了又patch
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Sun Sep 28 11:14:05 2014, 美东)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/09/28/bash_shellshock_bug_pat
我来帮解释吧: Redhat,跟思科一样,拿了open
source软件就卖钱,根本没有testing,confused
about how to properly address a 22-year old
security hole. 两公司都是烙印窝.

j*t2015-10-08 07:10

2 楼

小布偶四个月大，白白软软香香。第一次养猫，有不少疑问想问大家，比如说要回国一
段时间，空运猫猫似乎也不太方便，大家是怎么解决和猫猫异地的问题的呀？
不知道给猫猫找个猫友是不是个现实的办法，大家如果出行一段时间，可以相互照应着
，现在在湾区，欢迎在湾区的猫爸猫妈联系我。也希望听取其它各种解决方案。先谢谢
大家！

M*h2015-10-08 07:10

3 楼

威锋上说打开助听器功能就没了

o*e2015-10-08 07:10

4 楼

烙印是这么解释的：
When a second issue with Bash was found a few minutes after the first one
went public, we knew there was something wrong. We could have followed a
duct-tape approach and issued patches to our customers quickly or we could
have done this correctly. Applying multiple security updates is extremely
difficult!
When CVE-2014-7169 went public, there was a lot of visible confusion around
how to address this issue. This was fuelled by the media and by the fact
that exploits were immediately available on the internet.
Red Hat carefully analysed the root cause of the issue and wrote and tested
patches. We posted these patches to the community for review and allowing
everyone to freely use them if they wanted to. Doing things correctly takes
time!