avatar
o*5
1
EB1B,比较弱的case。 申请人是大学老师,而且公立学校支持申请。
果不其然,前天收到RFE。 但是我们看完之后蒙了,因为跟之前从本版学到的不太一样
。返回的文档写着,
"
...
A discussion follows addressing the evidence you have provided with the
petition.
(iv) Evidence of the beneficiary's participation....
Criterion met.
(v) Evidence of the beneficiary's original scientific ....
Criterion met.
(vi) Evidence of the beneficiary's authorship of ...
Criterion met.
As discussed above, the beneficiary has met at lease two of the six criteria
. As such, USCIS is affording the petitioner the opportunity to submit
addition evidence to establish the beneficiary meets the regulatory criteria
outlined above.
....

满足了至少两条的要求, 所以愿意提供RFE的机会。 问题是: 什么是regulatory
criteria??
后面跟着一堆描述,需要提供:
1. 第一条最轻粗:最高学位的证明,比如成绩单,参见日期,毕业日期,曾经独立教
学的证明.但是跟着的话,又看不懂了...
"
The evidence submitted did not include the beneficiary's highest education
level achieved. Therefore, please submit addition evidence such as the
degree and transcripts which establishes the beneficiary has attained a
degree for the specific academic field. ... Experience in teaching or
research while working on an advanced degrees will only be acceptable if the
alien has acquired the degree, and if the teaching duties were such that (s
)he had full responsibility for the class taught or if the research
conducted toward the degree has been recognized within the academic field as
outstanding.
"
这段话的意思是说,要学位证明之外,还要证明三年的研究经历相关,教学经历相关么
????
2. 然后是对petitioner一些要求,说要提供资金,收入之类的证明。
“The record does not demonstrate any evidence to establish the petitioners'
ability to pay and the continuing pay of the offered wage to the
beneficiary. ”
有人说这个不是常见的EB1B的回答。。。 大牛们怎么理解????
跪求指点!!!
avatar
T*r
2
avatar
W*o
3
要雇主提供支付工资能力的证明吧?学校很小吧?
avatar
C*n
4
I like this one:
>>Come to us with a problem only when you need help solving it.
Girls just want to share the shit they go through, WSN really does not have
time to listen to those bullshit, unless he can take some action to fix it.
avatar
P*I
5
这个是 非常典型的EB1b的要求,与EB1a不一样。
Eb1b基本评判的3项如下:
I. 3 out of 8 证明beneficiary本身 outstanding
a researcher who is recognized internationally as outstanding in a specific
academic area
II. 需要证明beneficiary有在本领域从事3年以上research 经验
a researcher has at least 3 years of experience in research in the academic
area
III. 需要证明beneficiary 进入相关领域的employer,并且继续从事相关领域的研究
工作。employer有至少3个research position,并且已经有一定研究成果投入应用
a researcher seeks to enter the United States for a comparable position to
conduct research in the area with a department, division, or institute of a
private employer, if the department, division, or institute employs at least
3 persons full-time in research activities and has achieved documented
accomplishments in an academic field.
lz已经证明了 第一项, IO现在RFE的是第二和第三项,应该不难准备。
好好回复,一定能过。
加油!
avatar
o*5
6
学校情况是: 20k的学生,上千的教师~~ 不算小的公立大学吧?
所以有人搞不懂这为什么被怀疑,虽然材料一定会准备就是了。
还有就是, 啥是regulatory criteria? 貌似很少有人遇到啊。
感谢回复~~~
avatar
o*5
7
感谢回复。
所以说,“条件I已经算是满足了;条件II,III被质疑了。”这样理解对么?
也就是说,RFE只要对条件II,III做出针对性回复就好了。因为本人情况较弱,实在不
敢再提关于自己研究有多出色方面的话题了 :(

specific
academic

【在 P*********I 的大作中提到】
: 这个是 非常典型的EB1b的要求,与EB1a不一样。
: Eb1b基本评判的3项如下:
: I. 3 out of 8 证明beneficiary本身 outstanding
: a researcher who is recognized internationally as outstanding in a specific
: academic area
: II. 需要证明beneficiary有在本领域从事3年以上research 经验
: a researcher has at least 3 years of experience in research in the academic
: area
: III. 需要证明beneficiary 进入相关领域的employer,并且继续从事相关领域的研究
: 工作。employer有至少3个research position,并且已经有一定研究成果投入应用

avatar
P*I
8
是的。基于RFE的内容,lz已经证明了自己的achievements,只需证明II,III。应该
不难。
Good luck

【在 o**********5 的大作中提到】
: 感谢回复。
: 所以说,“条件I已经算是满足了;条件II,III被质疑了。”这样理解对么?
: 也就是说,RFE只要对条件II,III做出针对性回复就好了。因为本人情况较弱,实在不
: 敢再提关于自己研究有多出色方面的话题了 :(
:
: specific
: academic

avatar
p*r
9
1B的RFE就是通过的意思,基本都是针对雇主的简单RFE.
可以提前恭喜楼主了。
你所谓的常见RFE,对于1B来说,就是指NOID,针对受益人的.那个就麻烦了。
avatar
o*5
10
非常感谢lunar大大的回复!
感谢!!!

【在 P*********I 的大作中提到】
: 是的。基于RFE的内容,lz已经证明了自己的achievements,只需证明II,III。应该
: 不难。
: Good luck

avatar
o*5
11
这么说来,还说我了解的情况太少了。 确实之前都是在想怎么回复 针对关于受益人本
身资质的质疑了,没太想过关于申请人(petitioner)的。
非常感谢清除疑惑!

【在 p********r 的大作中提到】
: 1B的RFE就是通过的意思,基本都是针对雇主的简单RFE.
: 可以提前恭喜楼主了。
: 你所谓的常见RFE,对于1B来说,就是指NOID,针对受益人的.那个就麻烦了。

相关阅读
logo
联系我们隐私协议©2024 redian.news
Redian新闻
Redian.news刊载任何文章,不代表同意其说法或描述,仅为提供更多信息,也不构成任何建议。文章信息的合法性及真实性由其作者负责,与Redian.news及其运营公司无关。欢迎投稿,如发现稿件侵权,或作者不愿在本网发表文章,请版权拥有者通知本网处理。