l*o
2 楼
我也是。。。
不知道过几天ER出来是不是要跌破11。。。
不知道过几天ER出来是不是要跌破11。。。
s*n
3 楼
same here
c*n
4 楼
11.44加了500股,没敢多加。
l*o
5 楼
Zynga Inc (NASDAQ:ZNGA) is a company that’s known for creating social games
for Facebook and mobile web but perhaps they will become more famous for
their CEO who spends far more on security than he should.
According to John Letzing from the Wall Street Journal, Zynga spent $1.37
million to protect the chief executive Marc Pincus and his family. This
included the purchase and maintenance of a home security system.
This wasn’t the only time Zynga’s CEO was involved in some questionable
money practices. Last fall when the company was gearing up for their IPO,
Pincus, along with other company executives, thought that his company gave
too much stock to employees, so he demanded that his employees give back
that extra money or face termination. CNET’S Don Resigner summed up their
plan:
In order to determine which employees would be asked to give stock back,
Pincus and his executives tried to pinpoint workers whose contributions to
Zynga–in the execs’ eyes–didn’t necessarily justify the potential cash
windfall they could receive when the company went public, the Journal claims
. One Journal source said that Zynga executives were especially concerned
with not creating a “Google chef” scenario.
That reference relates to Google’s 2004 IPO when one of the company’s
chefs, who was hired in the firm’s early days, walked away with $20 million
worth of stock after the shares went public.
Pincus gave the ultimatum to the select list of employees. One of those
employees left the company and another one hired lawyers in order to reach a
settlement agreement that would entitle them some shares.
It’s really not shocking to know that Pincus spends more money than he
should on personal security because its pretty clear that his real
investment is himself.
I would suggest that he closely monitors the company’s expenses and perhaps
spend less money on personal security because he could lose his job or put
the company in financial difficulties. It is especially peculiar that so
much is spent on his security since the company lost money (GAAP basis) in
Q411.
ValueWalk spoke to someone who knows Pincus well before the IPO. The
individual described him as one of the most despicable people in Silicon
Valley. Perhaps, he does want the extra security!
for Facebook and mobile web but perhaps they will become more famous for
their CEO who spends far more on security than he should.
According to John Letzing from the Wall Street Journal, Zynga spent $1.37
million to protect the chief executive Marc Pincus and his family. This
included the purchase and maintenance of a home security system.
This wasn’t the only time Zynga’s CEO was involved in some questionable
money practices. Last fall when the company was gearing up for their IPO,
Pincus, along with other company executives, thought that his company gave
too much stock to employees, so he demanded that his employees give back
that extra money or face termination. CNET’S Don Resigner summed up their
plan:
In order to determine which employees would be asked to give stock back,
Pincus and his executives tried to pinpoint workers whose contributions to
Zynga–in the execs’ eyes–didn’t necessarily justify the potential cash
windfall they could receive when the company went public, the Journal claims
. One Journal source said that Zynga executives were especially concerned
with not creating a “Google chef” scenario.
That reference relates to Google’s 2004 IPO when one of the company’s
chefs, who was hired in the firm’s early days, walked away with $20 million
worth of stock after the shares went public.
Pincus gave the ultimatum to the select list of employees. One of those
employees left the company and another one hired lawyers in order to reach a
settlement agreement that would entitle them some shares.
It’s really not shocking to know that Pincus spends more money than he
should on personal security because its pretty clear that his real
investment is himself.
I would suggest that he closely monitors the company’s expenses and perhaps
spend less money on personal security because he could lose his job or put
the company in financial difficulties. It is especially peculiar that so
much is spent on his security since the company lost money (GAAP basis) in
Q411.
ValueWalk spoke to someone who knows Pincus well before the IPO. The
individual described him as one of the most despicable people in Silicon
Valley. Perhaps, he does want the extra security!
j*g
7 楼
zynga什么时候ER?
l*o
10 楼
哦,这样。。。
谢谢大夫
谢谢大夫
l*o
11 楼
哦,这样。。。
谢谢大夫
谢谢大夫
相关阅读
支持新任领导,但有个小请求~我告诉你们一个秘密。真觉得股市就是给小散们送钱的ANR是我今年投资的股票中基本面最差的Job Report: Cannot Be Better for Bears油工是不是把挖油的钱都亏在股票上了?没有人期待我晚上的能源帖子么?这种盘危龙霸最熊了BAC 双顶了。 目标: <7other question for settled fundIRA account今日操作青蛙猜这次回调基本结束Biotech -- DSCO Hidden gem谁给说说RLD的走势其实 目前看 跌得还不给力,要阴跌了,妞妞倒霉了今天的就业数据是利好消息,我都找不到工作美国打了个喷嚏,欧元却跌倒了继续抄底IWM,07/13,82的靠TVIX怎么回事?