All 163 needed to add was 'in the case of'...# WaterWorld - 未名水世界
C*r
1 楼
In the case of p1*p2*p3*...*pn+1 being a new prime, the original hypothesis
is wrong.
The key was he/she didn't state being prime was only ONE OF THE CASES. Then
don't blame others who treated that statement as the entire truth.
is wrong.
The key was he/she didn't state being prime was only ONE OF THE CASES. Then
don't blame others who treated that statement as the entire truth.