【 以下文字转载自 JobHunting 讨论区 】 发信人: Lathander (灰色树枝灰色天空), 信区: JobHunting 标 题: Data/Computer Scientist Recruiting 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Thu Mar 3 17:01:24 2016, 美东) Anyone who is interested is welcome to contact me! Toyota Research Institute of North America is seeking a Data Scientist to support the in-house research activities. This individual will join a team responsible to develop state-of-art methodologies for material informatics. Key Responsibilities: • Develop novel machine learning and analytical models to deal with problems/challenges in material informatics • Data mining in large scale of experimental and simulation data • Frequent communication with material scientist within the organization • Regularly report and present to manager and the research team Minimum Requirements: • MS or above degree in Computer Science, Statistics or related technical field or equivalent practical experience. • Strength with machine learning and data mining techniques • Fluency in programming languages (Python, C/C++, Java). • Hands-on experience with statistical software (R, SAS, Matlab, Python). • Self-motivated, intelligent individual with initiative and drive for overcoming technical challenges. • Strong verbal and written communication skills. Preferred Requirements: • Experience with graph matching, distance metric learning and manifold learning techniques • Experience in scientific writing and presentation • Knowledge of material science, chemistry and physics. The position requires staying abreast of emerging field of machine learning, performing original research; publishing/presenting results, involve in collaborative research. Candidate must be able to work effectively with a diverse group of scientists.
The first logic flaw I can find is "免税存了$3k 401k" and "15%的税把401K取出来了" are two completely opposite strategy for different purposes. In another word, if you want to "多存401k" then you won't like to "15%的税把401K取出来", vise versa. Therefore, but executing this strategy you are forced to accept whatever outcome it brings, which may not be best for your present situation.
do it a few times and you will pay 15% tax a few times for free.
b*8
24 楼
re!!!
c*u
25 楼
两种都outcome都acceptable阿,explore 一下401K 自由进出的可能。
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】 : The first logic flaw I can find is "免税存了$3k 401k" and : "15%的税把401K取出来了" are two completely opposite strategy : for different purposes. In another word, if you want to : "多存401k" then you won't like to "15%的税把401K取出来", : vise versa. Therefore, but executing this strategy you are : forced to accept whatever outcome it brings, which may not be : best for your present situation. : : legal
z*x
26 楼
re
c*u
27 楼
什么意思啊?
【在 c**********l 的大作中提到】 : do it a few times and you will pay 15% tax a few times for free.
j*1
28 楼
re
K*D
29 楼
In that case I think there is no big issue with your plan. Looks to me it will work. The only setbacks are: 1) how do you hedge in 401k? For most people there is no short option. 2) Regular account loss is limited to 3k. A lot of hassle to control that. 3) A lot of your cash is tied up (assuming 1:1 hedging). It is probably only good if you really believe the market is going no where in the coming years.