不得不说，magic mouse还是不错的# Apple - 家有苹果
P*y
1 楼
最近Review一篇文章，理由充分地把它给据了。他们现在投到另一个杂志，又找到我
review，我是找个借口拒绝review，还是告诉Editor我以前review并据过这篇文章？
review，我是找个借口拒绝review，还是告诉Editor我以前review并据过这篇文章？
a*z
2 楼
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
antenna1 (antenna) 于 (Sat Mar 14 21:02:52 2009) 提到:
我的父母3月5日乘坐UA850时从北京来芝加哥看望我们，已经7年没有见面了。万分不幸
的是64岁的父亲在在飞机降落前1-2小时离座走动时头部发生剧烈碰撞，当时就跌倒在
地昏迷过去。飞机到达后马上被送到医院抢救。我们没能接到父母就直接去了医院。急
救室的医生告诉我们父亲的脑部受伤出血，情况非常严重，类似与出血性中风。父亲在
INTENSIVE CARE UNIT(ICU）住了7天，现仍在医院，病情已经稳定。父亲跌倒时飞机遇
到turbulence，我母亲感到飞机一震，然后就听到父亲跌倒的声音。
一周多来一直在医院照顾父亲，实在没有时间上网，现在寻找知情人，希望知道事情究
竟是怎样发生的，父亲是在什么时候，如何跌倒的。我妈说有一个四十多岁的中年男子
一直陪在父亲旁边，并把父亲的眼镜交给我妈。当时我妈脑子一片空白，根本不知道询
问事情的经过。UA至今没有给一个解释。还有不少人目击事情的发生。另外一个问
antenna1 (antenna) 于 (Sat Mar 14 21:02:52 2009) 提到:
我的父母3月5日乘坐UA850时从北京来芝加哥看望我们，已经7年没有见面了。万分不幸
的是64岁的父亲在在飞机降落前1-2小时离座走动时头部发生剧烈碰撞，当时就跌倒在
地昏迷过去。飞机到达后马上被送到医院抢救。我们没能接到父母就直接去了医院。急
救室的医生告诉我们父亲的脑部受伤出血，情况非常严重，类似与出血性中风。父亲在
INTENSIVE CARE UNIT(ICU）住了7天，现仍在医院，病情已经稳定。父亲跌倒时飞机遇
到turbulence，我母亲感到飞机一震，然后就听到父亲跌倒的声音。
一周多来一直在医院照顾父亲，实在没有时间上网，现在寻找知情人，希望知道事情究
竟是怎样发生的，父亲是在什么时候，如何跌倒的。我妈说有一个四十多岁的中年男子
一直陪在父亲旁边，并把父亲的眼镜交给我妈。当时我妈脑子一片空白，根本不知道询
问事情的经过。UA至今没有给一个解释。还有不少人目击事情的发生。另外一个问
r*u
3 楼
还不错
释小龙演的
在原著的基础上扩展了不少
一点点剧透，结尾改了，不喜欢原著的结尾
ppstream有
释小龙演的
在原著的基础上扩展了不少
一点点剧透，结尾改了，不喜欢原著的结尾
ppstream有
y*o
4 楼
今天收到了，除了slow tracking的问题之外，没啥问题。扁一点手感也不错，尤其是
scroll很舒服。
slow tracking以后的软件更新应该可以解决。
scroll很舒服。
slow tracking以后的软件更新应该可以解决。
j*l
5 楼
Of course 找个借口拒绝review.
You need to give that paper a chance.
【在 P*********y 的大作中提到】
: 最近Review一篇文章，理由充分地把它给据了。他们现在投到另一个杂志，又找到我
: review，我是找个借口拒绝review，还是告诉Editor我以前review并据过这篇文章？
You need to give that paper a chance.
【在 P*********y 的大作中提到】
: 最近Review一篇文章，理由充分地把它给据了。他们现在投到另一个杂志，又找到我
: review，我是找个借口拒绝review，还是告诉Editor我以前review并据过这篇文章？
x*h
6 楼
回家下去
k*c
7 楼
还是太贵了
d*0
8 楼
It's very common one manuscript was rejected by one journal (IF=10) and
accepted by other journal (IF=1).
accepted by other journal (IF=1).
s*n
9 楼
这个真的好看吗？一看那个剧照造型就感觉是雷剧，可是看到好几个帖子说不错，纠结
啊，要不要看看呢……
啊，要不要看看呢……
P*a
10 楼
有没有试过湿手用鼠标？
【在 y*******o 的大作中提到】
: 今天收到了，除了slow tracking的问题之外，没啥问题。扁一点手感也不错，尤其是
: scroll很舒服。
: slow tracking以后的软件更新应该可以解决。
【在 y*******o 的大作中提到】
: 今天收到了，除了slow tracking的问题之外，没啥问题。扁一点手感也不错，尤其是
: scroll很舒服。
: slow tracking以后的软件更新应该可以解决。
P*y
11 楼
Forgot to mention that IFs of the two journals are close (0.3 difference).
Problem is that their method is not theoretically correct (this is a
bioinformatics ms). My opinion is that this ms should not be published in
any journal.
【在 d***0 的大作中提到】
: It's very common one manuscript was rejected by one journal (IF=10) and
: accepted by other journal (IF=1).
Problem is that their method is not theoretically correct (this is a
bioinformatics ms). My opinion is that this ms should not be published in
any journal.
【在 d***0 的大作中提到】
: It's very common one manuscript was rejected by one journal (IF=10) and
: accepted by other journal (IF=1).
y*i
12 楼
个人感觉一般，如果不是因为古龙和释小龙，怕是没什么人去看。
P*a
13 楼
和老版一样的价钱啊
【在 k*****c 的大作中提到】
: 还是太贵了
【在 k*****c 的大作中提到】
: 还是太贵了
d*c
14 楼
oh, come on. Even the wrong method can still contribute to the field from
alternative aspect. If it is not a high-impact journal, why not mention your
concerns with major revision, rather than direct reject.
【在 P*********y 的大作中提到】
: Forgot to mention that IFs of the two journals are close (0.3 difference).
: Problem is that their method is not theoretically correct (this is a
: bioinformatics ms). My opinion is that this ms should not be published in
: any journal.
alternative aspect. If it is not a high-impact journal, why not mention your
concerns with major revision, rather than direct reject.
【在 P*********y 的大作中提到】
: Forgot to mention that IFs of the two journals are close (0.3 difference).
: Problem is that their method is not theoretically correct (this is a
: bioinformatics ms). My opinion is that this ms should not be published in
: any journal.
m*d
15 楼
这里面的易容术让通天帝国汗颜啊
让我想起了鱼龙百变神功
【在 s********n 的大作中提到】
: 这个真的好看吗？一看那个剧照造型就感觉是雷剧，可是看到好几个帖子说不错，纠结
: 啊，要不要看看呢……
让我想起了鱼龙百变神功
【在 s********n 的大作中提到】
: 这个真的好看吗？一看那个剧照造型就感觉是雷剧，可是看到好几个帖子说不错，纠结
: 啊，要不要看看呢……
m*g
16 楼
为啥要湿手？
其是
【在 P***a 的大作中提到】
: 有没有试过湿手用鼠标？
其是
【在 P***a 的大作中提到】
: 有没有试过湿手用鼠标？
f*l
17 楼
我曾经拒过一篇文章三次. 不同的journal, 我认为那根本就是概念错误.
有的时候有些跨学科的文章, 会违背在另外一个领域认为很基本的常识.
为了验证, 我还专门构造了一个反例给作者. 但是作者不死心, 换了杂志
继续来. 我只好接着拒. 不知道他有没有换第四家杂志发.
【在 P*********y 的大作中提到】
: Forgot to mention that IFs of the two journals are close (0.3 difference).
: Problem is that their method is not theoretically correct (this is a
: bioinformatics ms). My opinion is that this ms should not be published in
: any journal.
有的时候有些跨学科的文章, 会违背在另外一个领域认为很基本的常识.
为了验证, 我还专门构造了一个反例给作者. 但是作者不死心, 换了杂志
继续来. 我只好接着拒. 不知道他有没有换第四家杂志发.
【在 P*********y 的大作中提到】
: Forgot to mention that IFs of the two journals are close (0.3 difference).
: Problem is that their method is not theoretically correct (this is a
: bioinformatics ms). My opinion is that this ms should not be published in
: any journal.
c*t
18 楼
听说iphone／ipod touch＋air mouse（$1.99）比magic好。有人比过吗？
v*d
19 楼
既然是原则性错误，就直接把原来的review发给editor，建议editor直接锯掉，不要浪
费别的reviewer的时间
【在 P*********y 的大作中提到】
: 最近Review一篇文章，理由充分地把它给据了。他们现在投到另一个杂志，又找到我
: review，我是找个借口拒绝review，还是告诉Editor我以前review并据过这篇文章？
费别的reviewer的时间
【在 P*********y 的大作中提到】
: 最近Review一篇文章，理由充分地把它给据了。他们现在投到另一个杂志，又找到我
: review，我是找个借口拒绝review，还是告诉Editor我以前review并据过这篇文章？
y*o
20 楼
use iphone as a mouse? are you serious? maybe for fun only.
【在 c*********t 的大作中提到】
: 听说iphone／ipod touch＋air mouse（$1.99）比magic好。有人比过吗？
【在 c*********t 的大作中提到】
: 听说iphone／ipod touch＋air mouse（$1.99）比magic好。有人比过吗？
d*0
21 楼
Then just point out the problem and reject it again, again, and again .....
you don't need to tell the editor that you rejected it before.
【在 P*********y 的大作中提到】
: Forgot to mention that IFs of the two journals are close (0.3 difference).
: Problem is that their method is not theoretically correct (this is a
: bioinformatics ms). My opinion is that this ms should not be published in
: any journal.
you don't need to tell the editor that you rejected it before.
【在 P*********y 的大作中提到】
: Forgot to mention that IFs of the two journals are close (0.3 difference).
: Problem is that their method is not theoretically correct (this is a
: bioinformatics ms). My opinion is that this ms should not be published in
: any journal.
b*e
22 楼
这个太不实用了
【在 c*********t 的大作中提到】
: 听说iphone／ipod touch＋air mouse（$1.99）比magic好。有人比过吗？
【在 c*********t 的大作中提到】
: 听说iphone／ipod touch＋air mouse（$1.99）比magic好。有人比过吗？
e*p
23 楼
yes, just give the author another chance. If they had fetal error even in
methodology, other reviewers will see it.
methodology, other reviewers will see it.
a*y
24 楼
itap不错。
不过用iPhone/iPod touch貌似还是有时不够灵敏
【在 c*********t 的大作中提到】
: 听说iphone／ipod touch＋air mouse（$1.99）比magic好。有人比过吗？
不过用iPhone/iPod touch貌似还是有时不够灵敏
【在 c*********t 的大作中提到】
: 听说iphone／ipod touch＋air mouse（$1.99）比magic好。有人比过吗？
i*w
25 楼
If the paper has a fatal error, the LZ definitely should reject it.
If it is just a matter of contribution and IF, the LZ can give it a chance.
My 2 cents.
【在 e**p 的大作中提到】
: yes, just give the author another chance. If they had fetal error even in
: methodology, other reviewers will see it.
If it is just a matter of contribution and IF, the LZ can give it a chance.
My 2 cents.
【在 e**p 的大作中提到】
: yes, just give the author another chance. If they had fetal error even in
: methodology, other reviewers will see it.
q*n
26 楼
airmouse的drag lock关不掉
双击非常容易误点
【在 c*********t 的大作中提到】
: 听说iphone／ipod touch＋air mouse（$1.99）比magic好。有人比过吗？
双击非常容易误点
【在 c*********t 的大作中提到】
: 听说iphone／ipod touch＋air mouse（$1.99）比magic好。有人比过吗？
e*p
27 楼
I mean "if the paper has fatal error", maybe there is no error in
methodology. It is possible that LZ may misunderstand their work. It does not hurt anybody if just give them a chance.
Let other reviewers have a chance to judge it.
【在 i**w 的大作中提到】
: If the paper has a fatal error, the LZ definitely should reject it.
: If it is just a matter of contribution and IF, the LZ can give it a chance.
: My 2 cents.
methodology. It is possible that LZ may misunderstand their work. It does not hurt anybody if just give them a chance.
Let other reviewers have a chance to judge it.
【在 i**w 的大作中提到】
: If the paper has a fatal error, the LZ definitely should reject it.
: If it is just a matter of contribution and IF, the LZ can give it a chance.
: My 2 cents.
j*3
28 楼
我也觉得不错，扁一点到也没特别的感觉，也可能我用的时间不长。
确实scroll很方便。
友情提示一下。我刚把鼠标连上的时候只能移动光标和点击，不能滚屏，以为买了个坏
的。后来发现是要把系统升级，装一个mouse update，就行了。
【在 y*******o 的大作中提到】
: 今天收到了，除了slow tracking的问题之外，没啥问题。扁一点手感也不错，尤其是
: scroll很舒服。
: slow tracking以后的软件更新应该可以解决。
确实scroll很方便。
友情提示一下。我刚把鼠标连上的时候只能移动光标和点击，不能滚屏，以为买了个坏
的。后来发现是要把系统升级，装一个mouse update，就行了。
【在 y*******o 的大作中提到】
: 今天收到了，除了slow tracking的问题之外，没啥问题。扁一点手感也不错，尤其是
: scroll很舒服。
: slow tracking以后的软件更新应该可以解决。
v*d
29 楼
the authors should have already explained it in their responses, it is very
unlikely that LZ misunderstand it. If u avoid it that means u r unsure of
your concern, then you shouldn't reject it in the first place. "u" refers to
lz
not hurt anybody if just give them a chance.
【在 e**p 的大作中提到】
: I mean "if the paper has fatal error", maybe there is no error in
: methodology. It is possible that LZ may misunderstand their work. It does not hurt anybody if just give them a chance.
: Let other reviewers have a chance to judge it.
unlikely that LZ misunderstand it. If u avoid it that means u r unsure of
your concern, then you shouldn't reject it in the first place. "u" refers to
lz
not hurt anybody if just give them a chance.
【在 e**p 的大作中提到】
: I mean "if the paper has fatal error", maybe there is no error in
: methodology. It is possible that LZ may misunderstand their work. It does not hurt anybody if just give them a chance.
: Let other reviewers have a chance to judge it.
e*p
30 楼
if the paper was rejected by the journal, the authors have no chance to
explain in the responses.
very
to
【在 v******d 的大作中提到】
: the authors should have already explained it in their responses, it is very
: unlikely that LZ misunderstand it. If u avoid it that means u r unsure of
: your concern, then you shouldn't reject it in the first place. "u" refers to
: lz
:
: not hurt anybody if just give them a chance.
explain in the responses.
very
to
【在 v******d 的大作中提到】
: the authors should have already explained it in their responses, it is very
: unlikely that LZ misunderstand it. If u avoid it that means u r unsure of
: your concern, then you shouldn't reject it in the first place. "u" refers to
: lz
:
: not hurt anybody if just give them a chance.
i*w
31 楼
I am assuming other reviewers shared the samiliar concern as LZ, which led
to the rejection of the paper.
not hurt anybody if just give them a chance.
【在 e**p 的大作中提到】
: I mean "if the paper has fatal error", maybe there is no error in
: methodology. It is possible that LZ may misunderstand their work. It does not hurt anybody if just give them a chance.
: Let other reviewers have a chance to judge it.
to the rejection of the paper.
not hurt anybody if just give them a chance.
【在 e**p 的大作中提到】
: I mean "if the paper has fatal error", maybe there is no error in
: methodology. It is possible that LZ may misunderstand their work. It does not hurt anybody if just give them a chance.
: Let other reviewers have a chance to judge it.
v*d
32 楼
given that lz is so sure it is wrong, why can't he reject it again? If he
is unsure, then shouldn't he ask for author response?
【在 e**p 的大作中提到】
: if the paper was rejected by the journal, the authors have no chance to
: explain in the responses.
:
: very
: to
is unsure, then shouldn't he ask for author response?
【在 e**p 的大作中提到】
: if the paper was rejected by the journal, the authors have no chance to
: explain in the responses.
:
: very
: to
P*y
33 楼
The editor already gave them a chance to explain but in the response letter
they admitted the problems which they can't fix. Then the ms get rejected
after major revision.
【在 e**p 的大作中提到】
: if the paper was rejected by the journal, the authors have no chance to
: explain in the responses.
:
: very
: to
they admitted the problems which they can't fix. Then the ms get rejected
after major revision.
【在 e**p 的大作中提到】
: if the paper was rejected by the journal, the authors have no chance to
: explain in the responses.
:
: very
: to
P*y
34 楼
I don't want to provide an official review this time because I am afraid
that if I do so my anonymity will be lost due to the small research field.
【在 v******d 的大作中提到】
: given that lz is so sure it is wrong, why can't he reject it again? If he
: is unsure, then shouldn't he ask for author response?
that if I do so my anonymity will be lost due to the small research field.
【在 v******d 的大作中提到】
: given that lz is so sure it is wrong, why can't he reject it again? If he
: is unsure, then shouldn't he ask for author response?
v*d
35 楼
what is the point of not reviewing it?
letter
【在 P*********y 的大作中提到】
: The editor already gave them a chance to explain but in the response letter
: they admitted the problems which they can't fix. Then the ms get rejected
: after major revision.
letter
【在 P*********y 的大作中提到】
: The editor already gave them a chance to explain but in the response letter
: they admitted the problems which they can't fix. Then the ms get rejected
: after major revision.
P*y
36 楼
Even trash can be recycled :-)
your
【在 d**c 的大作中提到】
: oh, come on. Even the wrong method can still contribute to the field from
: alternative aspect. If it is not a high-impact journal, why not mention your
: concerns with major revision, rather than direct reject.
your
【在 d**c 的大作中提到】
: oh, come on. Even the wrong method can still contribute to the field from
: alternative aspect. If it is not a high-impact journal, why not mention your
: concerns with major revision, rather than direct reject.
P*y
37 楼
You are so fast, Little Wind :-)
Please check #17.
【在 v******d 的大作中提到】
: what is the point of not reviewing it?
:
: letter
Please check #17.
【在 v******d 的大作中提到】
: what is the point of not reviewing it?
:
: letter
v*d
38 楼
i don't use www, can't see which one is #17
【在 P*********y 的大作中提到】
: You are so fast, Little Wind :-)
: Please check #17.
【在 P*********y 的大作中提到】
: You are so fast, Little Wind :-)
: Please check #17.
b*d
39 楼
都是大牛，弱问如何有机会给杂志审稿，俺没发过好文章
s*y
40 楼
Then why don't you let the editor know all of the situation and give the
editor your previous review, then the editor should be able to take your
previous review into account even if he/she doesn't use you as a formal
reviewer.
【在 P*********y 的大作中提到】
: I don't want to provide an official review this time because I am afraid
: that if I do so my anonymity will be lost due to the small research field.
editor your previous review, then the editor should be able to take your
previous review into account even if he/she doesn't use you as a formal
reviewer.
【在 P*********y 的大作中提到】
: I don't want to provide an official review this time because I am afraid
: that if I do so my anonymity will be lost due to the small research field.
相关阅读
Gates 的吊词MY WAY, 褒贬不论,这首歌 JOBS 还是当之无愧的yesterday's iphone 4S event有个微薄在实况转播jobs家门口的凭吊教主牛在能东山再起有人知道ATT 去年6月底第一批IPHONE4用户升级成4S需要加多少钱吗？还有3500伪币，发给在server time 12:00左右The iPhone 4S’ Talking Assistant Is a Military Veteran苹果的商标以前是这样的iphone 4s还不在verizon store啊jobs家的新房子开好了吗aaaty准备陪葬吧现在知道乔布斯为什么辞职了吧不签约的iphone 4哪里有卖？价格多少？RIP Steve Jobsiphone 3GS干嘛要freeSamsung expresses sadness over Jobs' death （三星发唁电了）再论盖茨的历史地位 (转载)请推荐一个iphone 4s的保护套子吧。谢谢！Verizon / Sprint will sell iphone 4S as unlocked????