老猪,以下是前段时间看你们的诉讼文档时的一些个笔记.现贴出,供参考.
1. 针对被告的一些个质疑
Some notes based on Defendants' "Reponse to Motion:"
page 8, first para, last sentence "can you provide any evidence?" for "But
not all of these visa numbers allocated were used, because applicants were
either found to be ineligible or failed to appear for an interview."
"There was unexpectedly high demand for visas in fiscal years 2008 and 2009.
(See Dkt.
15, p. 12). As a result, the worldwide limit for EB-3 visas was reached
prior to the end of the
fiscal year. (See DOS A.R. at 20). This occurred prior to the per-country
limit for Chinese
nationality being reached. (See DOS A.R. at 15). As required under 8 U.S.C.
§ 1152, once the
worldwide limit for a particular preference class has been reached, no
further allocations may be
made in that class to applicants from any country. Therefore, the category
became “Unavailable”
to all applicants (even if a given nationality had not reached its per-
country limit)."