☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
microbe (纵使相逢应不识) 于 (Sat Feb 19 15:03:05 2011, 美东) 提到:
就让这个aaaty胡作非为？
我在苹果版发表原创文章，居然被封，是什么道理？请aaaty立即道歉并恢复文章。
====
Ebay announces 30% commission policy
SAN JOSE, Calif. - February 19th, 2011 - Today eBay announced a significant
change in its commission fee policy. Previously, for auctions, it charged a
tiered insertion fee up to $2 and a final value fee of 9% of the sale price
up to $50. For buy-it-now listings, it charged an insertion fee of $0.50 and
a tiered final value fee starting with 8-15% of the initial $50 down to 2%
of amount over $1000. The new poloicy, effective immediately, will charge a
30% commission of all sales, and the cap will be removed. Furthermore, eBay
mandates that a seller using its service cannot sell the same item with a
lower price anywhere else than its reserve or buy-it-now price on eBay.
eBay's announcement explains the policy change this way:" Our philosophy is
simple - when eBay brings a new sale to the seller, eBay earns a 30 percent
share; when the seller makes a sale elsewhere, the seller keeps 100 percent
and eBay earns nothing," said John Donahoe, the eBay CEO. "All we require is
that, if a seller is making an offer outside of eBay, the same (or better)
offer be made inside eBay, so the customers can easily buy with one-click
right on eBay. We believe that this innovative sale/auction service will
provide sellers with a brand new opportunity to expand access to their
merchandise onto eBay, delighting both new and existing buyers."
According to people familiar with the matter, eBay's move was motivated by
Apple's recent change in its App Store's subscription model. eBay executives
believe the value they bring to eBay sellers is even bigger than what Apple
brings to its App Store developers. "Apple's App Store is just one store,
and eBay hosts hundreds of thousands of virtual stores. If Apple can charge
a 30% fee, why can't we?" eBay CEO John Donahoe asked in a meeting, people
familiar with the matter said.
This announcement caused uproar in the seller's community. An unnamed seller
complained that this new commission would cut all his margins and force him
to find somewhere else. "I guess I'd have to do my business on Amazon
Marketplace now if this policy isn't reversed."
But eBay fanboys are cheering across the world. "I've been looking forward
to this day for two and a half years." an eBay buyer claimed, mimicking
Steve Jobs' famous line in his 2007 keynote. "I think with the innovation
eBay brought to its online auction market, it is entitled to a bigger cut
than what it was charging before." Another buyer sniffed at the possibility
that some sellers would have to withdraw from eBay, saying: "It's not about
the sellers. It's not about eBay getting money either. It's about eBay's
superior buyer experience. eBay protects buyers personal and payment
information, providing a far safer online purchase experience." A third
buyer commented blatantly: "It's eBay's market. It can do whatever it wants.
If you don't like it, don't sell or buy here."
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
wy (戒网) 于 (Sat Feb 19 15:06:25 2011, 美东) 提到:
哈哈哈哈，你也购胡作非为的，居然自己解封
significant
a
price
and
%
a
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
aaaty (阿fan提) 于 (Sat Feb 19 15:22:42 2011, 美东) 提到:
有人说你这是假新闻
你骂别人是retarded
这个总该封了吧。
请自己再把自己封了。
基本上你这是钓鱼贴
不管你是否原创
别人说假新闻你就说别人retard，钓鱼骂人PA
封14天都不过，我才封3天。
作为版务你有闲不如去管管其他版真的胡作非为的事情。
significant
a
price
and
%
a
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
microbe (纵使相逢应不识) 于 (Sat Feb 19 15:26:47 2011, 美东) 提到:
除了你自己说了，还有谁说了？文章都在垃圾箱，要不要我恢复了给你看看？
你别狡辩了。我在回之前你已经标记删除了，别以为我看不出来。
你说是假新闻就是假新闻？这文章里面引用的全是苹果的press release，只是借助新
闻的体裁，是个人都能看出是个笑话。自己假公济私就不要找借口了，以为别人都是傻
子？
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
aaaty (阿fan提) 于 (Sat Feb 19 15:35:10 2011, 美东) 提到:
你没有引用URL也没有说是原创
即使按照类似版面规矩也是可以随便删的。一碗水要端平，现在某些版动不动14天，本
版经常只有几天呢，你要不也管管？
反正这种帖子对于讨论这个问题没有任何帮助
更何况eBay和App Store类比并不恰当，即使你这是joke，也对版上严肃讨论此问题有
害。
你不满被封，好吧你自己解了，帖子是没有理由恢复的。
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
microbe (纵使相逢应不识) 于 (Sat Feb 19 15:50:42 2011, 美东) 提到:
哪里有规定原创就要标明，否则就要删除？
什么叫做“类似版面”？苹果版就是苹果版，哪里有规矩说“原创如果不标明就要被删
除”？
Who cares what YOU think? What makes YOU decide whether it's useful or not?
It's not like you take an impartial position on the subject.
No. 你封的，你来解。并且我坚持恢复帖子并道歉。
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
aaaty (阿fan提) 于 (Sat Feb 19 15:58:04 2011, 美东) 提到:
ok
解封了。
不过帖子不会恢复。版务有权决定帖子是否有益版面讨论。在大家还在为这个收费是否
合理，应该和什么类型的收费类比的情况下，此贴不合时宜。
比如应该讨论的是比如amazon以前收取的是70% kindle ebook sales price
而不是ebay
?
