ipad mini4 值得入吗? (转载) - 未名空间MITBBS历史存档

国际科技财经博客移民网络热点娱乐民生时事公众号

Redian新闻

>未名空间

>Apple - 家有苹果

ipad mini4 值得入吗? (转载)

ipad mini4 值得入吗? (转载)# Apple - 家有苹果

t*92016-11-22 08:11

1 楼

现在我在写一个R01 Proposal，准备投今年10月份的。为了提高此Proposal中的机会
，我的理想计划是在9月底发表一篇与此Proposal相关的Paper，或者是至少接收，我从
而可以写在Biosketch中。目前实验室正在紧锣密鼓地做与此Paper相关的试验。但是这
是理想的情况。如果在9月底之前无法让此文章顺利让某杂志接收，请问是不是所有的
NIH的Study Section在Proposal Review的前一个月都给一次机会让我们Update新的研
究进展，比如新的Publication？还是只有某些Study Section给这样一次机会？多谢
。

m*g2016-11-22 08:11

2 楼

通过什么银行存? 谢谢!

t*b2016-11-22 08:11

3 楼

【以下文字转载自 PDA 讨论区】
发信人: timssb (失业小硕), 信区: PDA
标题: ipad mini4 值得入吗?
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Tue Nov 22 00:48:43 2016, 美东)
32GB的275 amex再减25 250$ 价格是好价吗?

h*g2016-11-22 08:11

4 楼

所有的都可以，在距离评审还有一个月以前，一般负责评审的PO会发信通知。如果没有
，你可以在评审前6个星期左右联系PO

b*e2016-11-22 08:11

5 楼

Fidelity是有实体branch的，我就去过。你查查你的城市有没有。不过小地方很
可能没有。
如果没有，我估计你需要通过其他银行存。存到其他银行，然后转过去？

【在 m*****g 的大作中提到】

: 通过什么银行存? 谢谢!

f*s2016-11-22 08:11

6 楼

有钱就买没钱别bb

★ 发自iPhone App: ChineseWeb 13

【在 t****b 的大作中提到】

: 【以下文字转载自 PDA 讨论区】
: 发信人: timssb (失业小硕), 信区: PDA
: 标题: ipad mini4 值得入吗?
: 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Tue Nov 22 00:48:43 2016, 美东)
: 32GB的275 amex再减25 250$ 价格是好价吗?

C*t2016-11-22 08:11

7 楼

我个人的理解是，新的NIH Biosketch，就是为了解决这个问题的。不再是白纸黑字列
出publication，而是给一个链接（当然这个链接里的文章要发表之后你自己加进去）
。所以原则上说已经不需要写信给PO了，不知道理解的对不对。

F*n2016-11-22 08:11

8 楼

没有branch，可以自己写张支票给自己，然后用fidelity的手机app存支票（需要2500以
上的balance才能用）
要不就先存到你local的银行，然后通过fidelity晚上账户操作，直接从你别的银行ach
到你的fidelity

【在 m*****g 的大作中提到】

: 通过什么银行存? 谢谢!

A*72016-11-22 08:11

9 楼

微薄利润

h*g2016-11-22 08:11

10 楼

这个连接对于Reviewer来说，他可以看，可以不看，连接里面的内容不属于proposal的
一部分。但是你写信给PO提供的新材料，属于Proposal的一部分，Reviwer必须看。

b*e2016-11-22 08:11

11 楼

能给自己写支票那就是有其他银行了，显然直接网上转更简单快捷。

2500以
ach

【在 F****n 的大作中提到】

: 没有branch，可以自己写张支票给自己，然后用fidelity的手机app存支票（需要2500以
: 上的balance才能用）
: 要不就先存到你local的银行，然后通过fidelity晚上账户操作，直接从你别的银行ach
: 到你的fidelity

A*02016-11-22 08:11

12 楼

这个publication update是只对R01有效么？ R21 也可以吗？谢谢。马上要交R21了，
今天下午填了一堆的表，比DOE, NSF的proposal多太多了。

【在 h******g 的大作中提到】

: 这个连接对于Reviewer来说，他可以看，可以不看，连接里面的内容不属于proposal的
: 一部分。但是你写信给PO提供的新材料，属于Proposal的一部分，Reviwer必须看。

A*02016-11-22 08:11

13 楼

good point

2500以
ach

【在 F****n 的大作中提到】

h*g2016-11-22 08:11

14 楼

我认为是对所有的，至少我参加过的studysection有材料来自R21的

【在 A****0 的大作中提到】

: 这个publication update是只对R01有效么？ R21 也可以吗？谢谢。马上要交R21了，
: 今天下午填了一堆的表，比DOE, NSF的proposal多太多了。

m*g2016-11-22 08:11

15 楼

非常感谢各位的解释....

2500以
ach

【在 F****n 的大作中提到】

t*92016-11-22 08:11

16 楼

这也是我困惑的地方。我去年10月份R21的PO就没有通知我提交是否有新的Publication
Update （我的R21得了Award），而我今年2月份投的R01的PO就在5月份通知了是否有
Update，这也是我才开始知道原来还可以Update publication。

【在 A****0 的大作中提到】

: 这个publication update是只对R01有效么？ R21 也可以吗？谢谢。马上要交R21了，
: 今天下午填了一堆的表，比DOE, NSF的proposal多太多了。

m*i2016-11-22 08:11

17 楼

fidelity有branch也不收现金

t*92016-11-22 08:11

18 楼

谢谢！这是个好主意。

【在 h******g 的大作中提到】

: 所有的都可以，在距离评审还有一个月以前，一般负责评审的PO会发信通知。如果没有
: ，你可以在评审前6个星期左右联系PO

l*o2016-11-22 08:11

19 楼

【在 m**i 的大作中提到】

: fidelity有branch也不收现金

t*92016-11-22 08:11

20 楼

我觉得你是对的。下面是我刚从NIH网站上Copy的，应该是针对所有NIH的申请的。希望
对大家有帮助。
连接：http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/post_submission_faq.htm#2554
A. General Policy
The post-submission materials policy states that “the only post-submission
grant application materials that the NIH will accept are those resulting
from unforeseen administrative issues”, and lists the following acceptable
post-submission materials:
• Revised budget page(s) (e.g., change in budget request due to new
funding or institutional acquisition of equipment)
• Biographical sketches (e.g., change in senior/key personnel due
to the hiring, replacement, or loss of an investigator)
• Letters of support or collaboration resulting from a change in
senior/key personnel due to the hiring, replacement, or loss of an
investigator
• Adjustments resulting from natural disasters (e.g., loss of an
animal colony)
• Adjustments resulting from change of institution (e.g., PI moves
to another university)
• News of an article accepted for publication (a copy of the
article should not be sent)
1. May I submit any number of such items, or only one?
An investigator may submit any number of such items, but must follow the
page limits specified in the policy. That is, for post-submission materials
that are not required on a form page, and are not covered by one of the
exceptions such as an RFA or institutional training mechanism, each
explanation or letter is limited to one page. Therefore, if a research team
lost a member after the application was submitted, and the PD/PI wanted to
replace that individual with two substitute personnel, he could submit a one
-page explanation and biographical sketch for each new person, plus a
revised budget page(s).
2. Will NIH accept articles that have been accepted for publication and
did not result from an unforeseen administrative issue?
NIH will accept news of all articles that were accepted for publication
after the application was submitted and are relevant to the proposed project
. News of an article accepted for publication is considered another category
of acceptable post-submission materials, separate from information being
submitted from unforeseen administrative issues.) For each article accepted
, you may submit only the following: Authors, institutional affiliations,
title of the article, the journal that accepted it, and the expected time of
publication.
3. Why is there a 30-day cutoff for notification that a paper has been
accepted?
The purpose of the policy is to provide an even playing field across the
agency, types of applications, and study sections in terms of when the
reviewers have access to information and in terms of the types of
information they receive. The thirty-day window before a review meeting is
time when reviewers are concentrating on the applications and their
critiques, and SROs are making preparations for the meetings. In most cases,
reviewers are asked to submit their preliminary critiques, criterion scores
, and impact scores a week before the meeting.
4. Must the article accepted for publication be authored by the
investigators submitting the grant application?
In most cases NIH expects that news of an article accepted for publication
will be in reference to an article authored by the investigators submitting
the grant application, but news of an article authored by other
investigators could be accepted if the SRO determines that it directly
affects the work proposed in the application.
5. Why aren’t late-breaking research findings allowed as post-submission
material?
In most cases, the time from submission to the review meeting date is two-
three months, and reviewers gain access to the applications five-six weeks
before the review meeting date. Therefore, only a few weeks are left in
that window in which new data could be gathered, analyzed, and submitted.
For those mechanisms in which the time from submission to the review meeting
date may be longer, such as applications submitted in response to Requests
for Applications, or institutional training grant applications, the policy
provides exceptions to accommodate this additional time.

【在 h******g 的大作中提到】

: 我认为是对所有的，至少我参加过的studysection有材料来自R21的

t*92016-11-22 08:11

21 楼

更新的NIH通知：
Reminders and Updates: NIH Policy on Post-Submission Application Materials
Notice Number: NOT-OD-13-030
Key Dates
Release Date: January 29, 2013
Related Announcements
NOT-OD-13-013
NOT-OD-12-141
NOT-OD-12-111
NOT-OD-10-115
Issued by
National Institutes of Health (NIH)
Purpose
This Notice serves to update the NIH policy on post-submission application
materials issued in NOT-OD-10-115. Since the policy was issued, questions
have arisen concerning:
•News of promotions and positive tenure decisions;
• News of promotions and professional achievements for trainees and
faculty members on training grant applications; and
• Post-submission materials for applications submitted for the last
due date of a Request for Applications (RFA).
This Notice also serves as a reminder of these earlier updates to the post-
submission materials policy:
• If an application proposed to use a human embryonic cell line(s)
that is approved by the NIH Stem Cell Registry at least 30 days prior to the
peer review meeting, the SRO can include this update to the reviewers as
part of the post-submission materials (see NOT-OD-12-111).
•Videos, within defined limits, will be accepted as non post-
submission materials (see NOT-OD-12-141). Devices and other non-traditional
materials will not be accepted after submission, unless the application is
submitted for a Funding Opportunity Announcement that specifies other types
of allowable post-submission materials.
These clarifications do not modify the existing Just-In-Time requirements or
any other requests for additional information after the initial peer review.
On occasion, exceptions will be made to the NIH policy on post-submission
application materials to assist institutions and/or investigators affected
by natural disasters or other catastrophes. See, for example, NOT-OD-13-013.
Policy
Post-submission application materials are those submitted after submission
of the grant application but prior to the initial peer review. The NIH
policy on post-submission application materials specifies that, for the
majority of applications, the only post-submission materials that the NIH
will accept are those resulting from unforeseen administrative issues, an
option to be used when an unexpected event such as the departure of a
participant, natural disaster, etc. has occurred, not to correct oversights/
errors discovered after submission of the application.
The list of acceptable post-submission materials in the policy includes:
•Revised budget page(s) (e.g., change in budget request due to new
funding or institutional acquisition of equipment)
•Biographical sketches (e.g., change in senior/key personnel due to
the hiring, replacement, or loss of an investigator)
• Letters of support or collaboration resulting from a change in
senior/key personnel due to the hiring, replacement, or loss of an
investigator
• Adjustments resulting from natural disasters (e.g., loss of an
animal colony)
• Adjustments resulting from change of institution (e.g., PD/PI moves
to another university)
•News of an article accepted for publication (a copy of the article
should not be sent)
Effective immediately, the following changes will be implemented:
1. News of a professional promotion or positive tenure decision for any
Program Directors/Principal Investigators and Senior/Key Personnel also will
be accepted as post-submission application material. The news must be
received by the Scientific Review Officer one month (30 calendar days) prior
to the peer review meeting, and demonstrate concurrence from the Authorized
Organization Representative (AOR) of the applicant organization.
2. The policy provides exceptions for applications submitted in response to
RFAs that have a single due date. Because similar issues apply to the last
due date of an RFA with multiple due dates, the policy is revised through
this Notice to apply those exceptions to applications submitted for the last
due date of an RFA.
3. The policy lists acceptable post-submission materials for institutional
training and training-related grants [not fellowships (F series) or career (
K series)] applications, including "appointments and/or achievements". With
this policy, the following types of information will be accepted:
•News of a trainee's or former trainee's graduation, employment,
promotion, funding, publication or other professional achievement since the
training grant was submitted;
• News of a faculty member's promotion, funding, publication, or other
professional achievement since the training grant was submitted; and
• News of an additional faculty member who will be involved in the
training activity.
All other requirements and exceptions specified in NOT-OD-10-115 remain in
effect.
Inquiries
Please direct all inquiries to [email protected]/* */
- See more at: http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-13-030.html#sthash.3qZY3AbV.dpuf