avatar
f*e
1
I just saw the nice talk about JBC. I want to point out that it is more fair
to say that JBC is a very good journal to publish papers having a lot
biochemical data including enzymology and biochemical approaches, as far as to
those about developmentand cell biology, it is definitely not a good choice to
send your paper there. Another thing I want to remind you guys that JBC has
only one peer reviewer, this is probably partial reason that it also published
bull shit papers a lot.
avatar
a*n
2
we have several times thatthe comments from JBC reviewer is very strange.
recently we had a paper, rejected by JBC but accepted by EMBO. That
really is good work but JBC reviewer can not understand it.
we feel the mechanism of JBC is not so good. But maybe they have to deal
with so many papers, that they can only do the best like this.

to
to
published

【在 f**********e 的大作中提到】
: I just saw the nice talk about JBC. I want to point out that it is more fair
: to say that JBC is a very good journal to publish papers having a lot
: biochemical data including enzymology and biochemical approaches, as far as to
: those about developmentand cell biology, it is definitely not a good choice to
: send your paper there. Another thing I want to remind you guys that JBC has
: only one peer reviewer, this is probably partial reason that it also published
: bull shit papers a lot.

相关阅读
logo
联系我们隐私协议©2024 redian.news
Redian新闻
Redian.news刊载任何文章,不代表同意其说法或描述,仅为提供更多信息,也不构成任何建议。文章信息的合法性及真实性由其作者负责,与Redian.news及其运营公司无关。欢迎投稿,如发现稿件侵权,或作者不愿在本网发表文章,请版权拥有者通知本网处理。