a*o
10 楼
以后只有直接投稿(Track II)
l*n
11 楼
no. only track I (communicated by XXX) will be eliminated this time.
in fact, they increased the number of track III (contributed by YYY) from 2
to 4 papers per year. however, there are many more restrictions applied.
http://www.pnas.org/site/misc/iforc.shtml
【在 a****o 的大作中提到】
: 以后只有直接投稿(Track II)
in fact, they increased the number of track III (contributed by YYY) from 2
to 4 papers per year. however, there are many more restrictions applied.
http://www.pnas.org/site/misc/iforc.shtml
【在 a****o 的大作中提到】
: 以后只有直接投稿(Track II)
O*e
12 楼
我觉得保留Track III也未尝不可,院士嘛,有点小特权也说得过去,而且呢,我们还
是要
相信他们对自己工作的判断力。但那个Track I的弊病就太大了,猫腻太多,劣质产品
主要
就出现在这些papers上。
2
【在 l**********n 的大作中提到】
: no. only track I (communicated by XXX) will be eliminated this time.
: in fact, they increased the number of track III (contributed by YYY) from 2
: to 4 papers per year. however, there are many more restrictions applied.
: http://www.pnas.org/site/misc/iforc.shtml
是要
相信他们对自己工作的判断力。但那个Track I的弊病就太大了,猫腻太多,劣质产品
主要
就出现在这些papers上。
2
【在 l**********n 的大作中提到】
: no. only track I (communicated by XXX) will be eliminated this time.
: in fact, they increased the number of track III (contributed by YYY) from 2
: to 4 papers per year. however, there are many more restrictions applied.
: http://www.pnas.org/site/misc/iforc.shtml
l*n
14 楼
其实好像就比 citation 的话 Track I 比 Track II 还多,average 来讲,
Track III 最差。
要是 PNAS 就定位在主要接受 papers not accepted by science 也还好了,
毕竟经过 science 的 review 和 revision, 应该不会太差。而且也给 authors
至少提供一个 safety net,文章不会因为 unlucky 碰到一个 harsh reviewer
就给 free fall 了。
【在 O******e 的大作中提到】
: 我觉得保留Track III也未尝不可,院士嘛,有点小特权也说得过去,而且呢,我们还
: 是要
: 相信他们对自己工作的判断力。但那个Track I的弊病就太大了,猫腻太多,劣质产品
: 主要
: 就出现在这些papers上。
:
: 2
Track III 最差。
要是 PNAS 就定位在主要接受 papers not accepted by science 也还好了,
毕竟经过 science 的 review 和 revision, 应该不会太差。而且也给 authors
至少提供一个 safety net,文章不会因为 unlucky 碰到一个 harsh reviewer
就给 free fall 了。
【在 O******e 的大作中提到】
: 我觉得保留Track III也未尝不可,院士嘛,有点小特权也说得过去,而且呢,我们还
: 是要
: 相信他们对自己工作的判断力。但那个Track I的弊病就太大了,猫腻太多,劣质产品
: 主要
: 就出现在这些papers上。
:
: 2
n*d
15 楼
这样的话还是尽量投奔院士比较好
2
【在 l**********n 的大作中提到】
: no. only track I (communicated by XXX) will be eliminated this time.
: in fact, they increased the number of track III (contributed by YYY) from 2
: to 4 papers per year. however, there are many more restrictions applied.
: http://www.pnas.org/site/misc/iforc.shtml
2
【在 l**********n 的大作中提到】
: no. only track I (communicated by XXX) will be eliminated this time.
: in fact, they increased the number of track III (contributed by YYY) from 2
: to 4 papers per year. however, there are many more restrictions applied.
: http://www.pnas.org/site/misc/iforc.shtml
a*o
16 楼
谢谢更正
院士福利不错呀
2
【在 l**********n 的大作中提到】
: no. only track I (communicated by XXX) will be eliminated this time.
: in fact, they increased the number of track III (contributed by YYY) from 2
: to 4 papers per year. however, there are many more restrictions applied.
: http://www.pnas.org/site/misc/iforc.shtml
院士福利不错呀
2
【在 l**********n 的大作中提到】
: no. only track I (communicated by XXX) will be eliminated this time.
: in fact, they increased the number of track III (contributed by YYY) from 2
: to 4 papers per year. however, there are many more restrictions applied.
: http://www.pnas.org/site/misc/iforc.shtml
相关阅读
租用lab诚聘生物化学试剂Sales Representative (Full-time/Part-time)求推荐好用的Flag抗体致Tianzi科研界(got)包子求两篇paper,非常感谢寻AACR2015 philadelphia conference 女室友【求职招聘】诚聘心血管、神经、骨科方向兼职和全职SCI杂志审稿机会有人认识Chieh Chang ,Chiou-Fen Chuang吗?Oxford Nanopore 纽约再次招人请乱喷留点口德,难道还要让王建华自杀吗?施一公忆父文观感求文献一篇求下载paper懒虫提核酸顶层设计和政策制度的连续性请问大牛们在老鼠肺里如何染 M1 MacrophagesTianzi大侠要走了,伤心有感推荐一种8 well的culture well plate