13% misconduct had witnessed in UK BMJ submitting authors# Biology - 生物学
l*1
1 楼
不知道匿名回答misconduct had witnessed的是自己的呢还是不小心目击到他/她人的
要不是匿名调研 0.01% 吧 出自目击到他/她人的
BMJ survey on research misconduct
13 Jan, 12 | by BMJ Group
We conducted an electronic survey of our UK-based submitting authors and
reviewers about research misconduct in the UK. We invited 9,036 to take
part and 2,782 responded (31%) within a week. We asked them if they had
witnessed, or had firsthand knowledge of, UK-based scientists or doctors
inappropriately adjusting, excluding, altering or fabricating data during
their research or for the purposes of publication. We also asked them if
they were aware of any cases of possible research misconduct at their
institution that, in their view, had not been properly investigated? 354 (
13%) reported they had witnessed or hand firsthand knowledge of misconduct
and 163 (6%) felt that cases had not been properly investigated.
Details of our methods and study limitations are provided in the PowerPoint
presentation below.
full text link:
//blogs.bmj.com/bmj/files/2012/01/BMJ-research-misconduct-survey-for-posting-on-bmj.com_.pdf
BMJ is a partially open-access[1] peer-reviewed medical journal. Originally called the British Medical Journal,
the title was officially shortened to BMJ in 1988.
The journal began publishing on 3 October 1840 as the Provincial Medical and Surgical Journal and quickly
attracted the attention of physicians around the world through its publication of high-impact original
research articles and unique case reports.
IF 13.6 2009
form
//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BMJ
NB: 其中的PI 应该有White吧
不单单是中 印 日 韩等亚洲的大学毕业的PI 自己心里知道自己做过miscoundcut submision吧?
要不是匿名调研 0.01% 吧 出自目击到他/她人的
BMJ survey on research misconduct
13 Jan, 12 | by BMJ Group
We conducted an electronic survey of our UK-based submitting authors and
reviewers about research misconduct in the UK. We invited 9,036 to take
part and 2,782 responded (31%) within a week. We asked them if they had
witnessed, or had firsthand knowledge of, UK-based scientists or doctors
inappropriately adjusting, excluding, altering or fabricating data during
their research or for the purposes of publication. We also asked them if
they were aware of any cases of possible research misconduct at their
institution that, in their view, had not been properly investigated? 354 (
13%) reported they had witnessed or hand firsthand knowledge of misconduct
and 163 (6%) felt that cases had not been properly investigated.
Details of our methods and study limitations are provided in the PowerPoint
presentation below.
full text link:
//blogs.bmj.com/bmj/files/2012/01/BMJ-research-misconduct-survey-for-posting-on-bmj.com_.pdf
BMJ is a partially open-access[1] peer-reviewed medical journal. Originally called the British Medical Journal,
the title was officially shortened to BMJ in 1988.
The journal began publishing on 3 October 1840 as the Provincial Medical and Surgical Journal and quickly
attracted the attention of physicians around the world through its publication of high-impact original
research articles and unique case reports.
IF 13.6 2009
form
//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BMJ
NB: 其中的PI 应该有White吧
不单单是中 印 日 韩等亚洲的大学毕业的PI 自己心里知道自己做过miscoundcut submision吧?
