h*k
2 楼
L*r
3 楼
Report this comment | #48104
Bill Capricorn said:
Why ridiculous news articles in a prestigous academic jounal raise
suspicions
'Regular brain monitoring of editors' could help to dispel doubts.
For news in an academic journal, how ridiculous is too ridiculous? That
question might have dogged the editor of the British academic journal "
Nature". The recent news report by this journal "Why great Olympic feats
raise suspicions" has raised ubiquitous concerns about whether its editor
has experienced severe brain damage.
Was the ridiculousness of that news article anomalous?
Yes. Since Nature's first publication in 1869, never have people seen
news articles this ridiculous approved by its editors. The decision of
publishing this article is absolutely out of readers' expectations.
Dosen't serving as the editor of an academic journal rule of the
possibility of brain damage?
No, says Sister Pheonix, a well-known expert in the field of bran damage
research.
How would ridiculousness of articles be used to test for brain damage of
editors?
Readers need a better way of flagging anomalous ridiculousness of news
articles, says Sister Lotus. The Global Times, a news paper that views China
as simply freaking awesome and the rest
of the world pretty much piece of crap, dabbled in regular brain
monitoring of its editors.
Could an editor then be hospitalized simply for publishing articles too
ridiculous?
"That would be unfair", says Sister Pheonix. "The final verdict is only
ever going to be reached by medical examination. It has to be." Publishing
ridiculous articles is too far removed from brain damage of the editor and
influenced by too many outside factors, Sister Pheonix says. "When we read
this wickedly ridiculous news article approved for publishing by it editor,
that's not proof of anything. It asks a question or two."
Bill Capricorn said:
Why ridiculous news articles in a prestigous academic jounal raise
suspicions
'Regular brain monitoring of editors' could help to dispel doubts.
For news in an academic journal, how ridiculous is too ridiculous? That
question might have dogged the editor of the British academic journal "
Nature". The recent news report by this journal "Why great Olympic feats
raise suspicions" has raised ubiquitous concerns about whether its editor
has experienced severe brain damage.
Was the ridiculousness of that news article anomalous?
Yes. Since Nature's first publication in 1869, never have people seen
news articles this ridiculous approved by its editors. The decision of
publishing this article is absolutely out of readers' expectations.
Dosen't serving as the editor of an academic journal rule of the
possibility of brain damage?
No, says Sister Pheonix, a well-known expert in the field of bran damage
research.
How would ridiculousness of articles be used to test for brain damage of
editors?
Readers need a better way of flagging anomalous ridiculousness of news
articles, says Sister Lotus. The Global Times, a news paper that views China
as simply freaking awesome and the rest
of the world pretty much piece of crap, dabbled in regular brain
monitoring of its editors.
Could an editor then be hospitalized simply for publishing articles too
ridiculous?
"That would be unfair", says Sister Pheonix. "The final verdict is only
ever going to be reached by medical examination. It has to be." Publishing
ridiculous articles is too far removed from brain damage of the editor and
influenced by too many outside factors, Sister Pheonix says. "When we read
this wickedly ridiculous news article approved for publishing by it editor,
that's not proof of anything. It asks a question or two."
p*n
4 楼
找二手版的倒爷，或者在国内找银行门口的倒爷
Q*n
5 楼
hehe
l*8
6 楼
找银行门口的倒爷可靠不？拿现金交易？、
【在 p*******n 的大作中提到】
: 找二手版的倒爷，或者在国内找银行门口的倒爷
【在 p*******n 的大作中提到】
: 找二手版的倒爷，或者在国内找银行门口的倒爷
相关阅读
paper help就是不知道怎么写文章，请过来人指点！Science投了四周多也没消息，怎么回事？现在的生物学能不能人工制造一个简单的生命体。生化不分家，来讨论个实际点的问题，关于凉皮的真想找个生物博后做男朋友 (转载)请教: 如何写审稿意见?紧急求助：再次找薄厚，还未面试先要推荐信，该怎么办？有人用过flow cytometry 检测HCV protein的抗体吗？现在生物的行情是啥？Sunney 还是牛3.9-3.12 会议万能的生物版啊，告诉我怎么纯化小鼠卵细胞杭州师范大学医学院衰老研究所 诚聘Give postdocs a career, not empty promisestechnical service scientist?chemistry & biology 算cell的子刊吗? reputation怎样?TO：大家看一看我LG这样还有希望走学术道路吗NIBS有两篇文章受到质疑？Stand Up for University of California