Redian新闻
>
美国律师都文盲吗?这么判的话,分子诊断还怎么挣钱?
avatar
美国律师都文盲吗?这么判的话,分子诊断还怎么挣钱?# Biology - 生物学
x*2
1
这个一般是算cash advance还是purchase啊? first bank. 谢谢
avatar
M*P
2
Sequenom’s test, which uses DNA found in maternal blood samples to
determine certain fetal characteristics, avoids the risk of more invasive
tests, such as taking samples from
the fetus or placenta. The court ruled that detecting DNA in blood falls
under the US Supreme Court’s rule against patenting natural phenomena (Nat.
Biotechnol. 32, 403–404, 2014). While calling the test “a positive and
valuable contribution to science...[e]ven such valuable contributions
can fall short of statutory patentable subject matter, as it does here.”
Another judge wrote in a concurring opinion that though he was obligated to
invalidate the patent claims, “[b]ut for the sweeping language in the
Supreme Court’s
Mayo opinion, I see no reason, in policy or statute, why this
breakthrough invention should be deemed patent ineligible。
avatar
e*i
3
it depends on the cc. Never use citi cc.

【在 x*******2 的大作中提到】
: 这个一般是算cash advance还是purchase啊? first bank. 谢谢
avatar
k*o
4
LOL,利好中国的测序工厂们。门槛没有了。

Nat.
to

【在 M*P 的大作中提到】
: Sequenom’s test, which uses DNA found in maternal blood samples to
: determine certain fetal characteristics, avoids the risk of more invasive
: tests, such as taking samples from
: the fetus or placenta. The court ruled that detecting DNA in blood falls
: under the US Supreme Court’s rule against patenting natural phenomena (Nat.
: Biotechnol. 32, 403–404, 2014). While calling the test “a positive and
: valuable contribution to science...[e]ven such valuable contributions
: can fall short of statutory patentable subject matter, as it does here.”
: Another judge wrote in a concurring opinion that though he was obligated to
: invalidate the patent claims, “[b]ut for the sweeping language in the

avatar
x*2
5
有什么推荐的CC吗?AMEX呢?

【在 e*i 的大作中提到】
: it depends on the cc. Never use citi cc.
avatar
m*9
6
被你称作文盲的律师表示:你肯定不知道35 USC 101,这个判决的background,以及要
怎么搞才能用分子诊断赚钱。

不过考虑到我们都是文盲了,就不给你解释了。
avatar
e*i
7
bank will not accept that.

【在 x*******2 的大作中提到】
: 有什么推荐的CC吗?AMEX呢?
avatar
w*o
8
In this case, the patent lawyer didn't write the application right.
avatar
x*2
9
如果用500刀的 GIFT CARD呢?

【在 e*i 的大作中提到】
: bank will not accept that.
avatar
D*a
10
楼主能否给文盲讲讲这个跟乳腺癌诊断那个划时代判决的区别在哪。当然我也可以自己
找找但是考虑到我是文盲找了估计也看不懂了。
avatar
c*r
11
利益集团博弈的结果,楼主以为人家文盲不懂,其实人家心里明镜似的,比你明白得多
了。
avatar
F*p
12
母体血DNA检测这个也不是seqeunom原创发明,是公认的科学应用,怎么能申请专利?
特有的protocol,equipment和reagent, analysis algorithem才可以申请专利。
avatar
c*o
13
Sequenom 测试的可靠性还不是特别好吧

Nat.
to

【在 M*P 的大作中提到】
: Sequenom’s test, which uses DNA found in maternal blood samples to
: determine certain fetal characteristics, avoids the risk of more invasive
: tests, such as taking samples from
: the fetus or placenta. The court ruled that detecting DNA in blood falls
: under the US Supreme Court’s rule against patenting natural phenomena (Nat.
: Biotechnol. 32, 403–404, 2014). While calling the test “a positive and
: valuable contribution to science...[e]ven such valuable contributions
: can fall short of statutory patentable subject matter, as it does here.”
: Another judge wrote in a concurring opinion that though he was obligated to
: invalidate the patent claims, “[b]ut for the sweeping language in the

相关阅读
logo
联系我们隐私协议©2024 redian.news
Redian新闻
Redian.news刊载任何文章,不代表同意其说法或描述,仅为提供更多信息,也不构成任何建议。文章信息的合法性及真实性由其作者负责,与Redian.news及其运营公司无关。欢迎投稿,如发现稿件侵权,或作者不愿在本网发表文章,请版权拥有者通知本网处理。