c*a
2 楼
J2签证 现住加拿大,是加拿大永久居民,Ld在美国工作持J1签证,现在在申请美国绿
卡I-140刚批准,我在返回美国入境时有什么问题吗? 是不是合法那?
回去主要是想一起提交I-485. 在提交I-140前半年曾两次入境过,当然那个时候没问
题,现在提交I-140并批准了,是不是就有移民倾向了,在入境会有麻烦吗?
卡I-140刚批准,我在返回美国入境时有什么问题吗? 是不是合法那?
回去主要是想一起提交I-485. 在提交I-140前半年曾两次入境过,当然那个时候没问
题,现在提交I-140并批准了,是不是就有移民倾向了,在入境会有麻烦吗?
g*g
3 楼
不到40,说是要趁娃没上学去周游世界。我看过他原来一些代码不怎么样。发财这个事
情真是命好最重要。
情真是命好最重要。
c*t
4 楼
【 以下文字转载自 Biology 讨论区 】
发信人: compact (support), 信区: Biology
标 题: 三个包子求两篇文章
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Sun Jun 21 00:17:32 2015, 美东)
http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/gcry20/21/1-2
A guide to the crystallographic analysis of icosahedral viruses
Alexander McPherson & Steven B. Larson
pages 3-56
DOI:10.1080/0889311X.2014.963572
Published online: 06 Jan 2015
Virus crystallography and structural virology: a personal perspective
Michael G. Rossmann
pages 57-102
DOI:10.1080/0889311X.2014.957282
Published online: 14 Nov 2014
多谢!
发信人: compact (support), 信区: Biology
标 题: 三个包子求两篇文章
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Sun Jun 21 00:17:32 2015, 美东)
http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/gcry20/21/1-2
A guide to the crystallographic analysis of icosahedral viruses
Alexander McPherson & Steven B. Larson
pages 3-56
DOI:10.1080/0889311X.2014.963572
Published online: 06 Jan 2015
Virus crystallography and structural virology: a personal perspective
Michael G. Rossmann
pages 57-102
DOI:10.1080/0889311X.2014.957282
Published online: 14 Nov 2014
多谢!
m*p
8 楼
my parent are peasants, just got visas days ago from Guanzhou, hopefully,
follwoing references are helpful,
1: i mentioned that i covered all expenses of their visit in invitation
letter;
Q1: do you have income in china?
A: still own some lands, get 1000rmb monthly to rent land out;
Q2: do you have property?
A: one old houes.
Q3: do you have other kids in china?
A: 2 daughters
Q4; do you have any deposit?
A: 50k rms
VO spent much more time on my supportive docs.
follwoing references are helpful,
1: i mentioned that i covered all expenses of their visit in invitation
letter;
Q1: do you have income in china?
A: still own some lands, get 1000rmb monthly to rent land out;
Q2: do you have property?
A: one old houes.
Q3: do you have other kids in china?
A: 2 daughters
Q4; do you have any deposit?
A: 50k rms
VO spent much more time on my supportive docs.
w*g
9 楼
c*y
10 楼
另外两个女儿是关键啊
【在 m******p 的大作中提到】
: my parent are peasants, just got visas days ago from Guanzhou, hopefully,
: follwoing references are helpful,
: 1: i mentioned that i covered all expenses of their visit in invitation
: letter;
: Q1: do you have income in china?
: A: still own some lands, get 1000rmb monthly to rent land out;
: Q2: do you have property?
: A: one old houes.
: Q3: do you have other kids in china?
: A: 2 daughters
【在 m******p 的大作中提到】
: my parent are peasants, just got visas days ago from Guanzhou, hopefully,
: follwoing references are helpful,
: 1: i mentioned that i covered all expenses of their visit in invitation
: letter;
: Q1: do you have income in china?
: A: still own some lands, get 1000rmb monthly to rent land out;
: Q2: do you have property?
: A: one old houes.
: Q3: do you have other kids in china?
: A: 2 daughters
l*n
12 楼
你让马云与现在为起点,他可以很快崛起因为他成功过,你如果让他以15年前为起点,
我估计没啥可能再成功。很多成功是不可复制的
【在 w***g 的大作中提到】
: 发了财的都是以前花时间想怎么发财的,程序写的好的都是花时间想怎么写程序的。
: 一个好了另一个自然就差。钻研怎么发财那些人是有可重复性的,很多人输个精光
: 后短时间内就能东山再起。马云你让他重新再来一次,未必能做得这么大,但
: 绝对不会小。靠写程序发财那是碰运气,没有可重复性。
: 我上次还问过赵策士兵和军官的问题。就算进了Navy SEAL,也还只是个士兵。
: 写程序的就是个士兵,程序写得再好,也还是个士兵。
: 话说看来还是我和你们netflix闲,有大把的时间上网灌水。
我估计没啥可能再成功。很多成功是不可复制的
【在 w***g 的大作中提到】
: 发了财的都是以前花时间想怎么发财的,程序写的好的都是花时间想怎么写程序的。
: 一个好了另一个自然就差。钻研怎么发财那些人是有可重复性的,很多人输个精光
: 后短时间内就能东山再起。马云你让他重新再来一次,未必能做得这么大,但
: 绝对不会小。靠写程序发财那是碰运气,没有可重复性。
: 我上次还问过赵策士兵和军官的问题。就算进了Navy SEAL,也还只是个士兵。
: 写程序的就是个士兵,程序写得再好,也还是个士兵。
: 话说看来还是我和你们netflix闲,有大把的时间上网灌水。
q*c
26 楼
搞笑了,再来一次马云可能连电子商务根本都没机会接触,或者更可能根本没机会一点
点锻炼自己,最可能的是有各种原因导致不敢冒险起家。
原因太多了。
【在 w***g 的大作中提到】
: 发了财的都是以前花时间想怎么发财的,程序写的好的都是花时间想怎么写程序的。
: 一个好了另一个自然就差。钻研怎么发财那些人是有可重复性的,很多人输个精光
: 后短时间内就能东山再起。马云你让他重新再来一次,未必能做得这么大,但
: 绝对不会小。靠写程序发财那是碰运气,没有可重复性。
: 我上次还问过赵策士兵和军官的问题。就算进了Navy SEAL,也还只是个士兵。
: 写程序的就是个士兵,程序写得再好,也还是个士兵。
: 话说看来还是我和你们netflix闲,有大把的时间上网灌水。
点锻炼自己,最可能的是有各种原因导致不敢冒险起家。
原因太多了。
【在 w***g 的大作中提到】
: 发了财的都是以前花时间想怎么发财的,程序写的好的都是花时间想怎么写程序的。
: 一个好了另一个自然就差。钻研怎么发财那些人是有可重复性的,很多人输个精光
: 后短时间内就能东山再起。马云你让他重新再来一次,未必能做得这么大,但
: 绝对不会小。靠写程序发财那是碰运气,没有可重复性。
: 我上次还问过赵策士兵和军官的问题。就算进了Navy SEAL,也还只是个士兵。
: 写程序的就是个士兵,程序写得再好,也还是个士兵。
: 话说看来还是我和你们netflix闲,有大把的时间上网灌水。
ET
34 楼
yes, they are free to go whatever they want to go.
What I said "no way to go" is that they are not like the company two
founders who have been awarded $3M/each. The employees gets nothing because
rest of he investment money has been returned back to the investors.
It's like you give up some better salary opportunity to join this company,
and hope you can make big bucks after a few years. After two years, you
found out you made some salary only. Your stock option is worthless.
【在 c*******0 的大作中提到】
:
: What? Their employees are good and hot. They have many options to explore
: right now.
What I said "no way to go" is that they are not like the company two
founders who have been awarded $3M/each. The employees gets nothing because
rest of he investment money has been returned back to the investors.
It's like you give up some better salary opportunity to join this company,
and hope you can make big bucks after a few years. After two years, you
found out you made some salary only. Your stock option is worthless.
【在 c*******0 的大作中提到】
:
: What? Their employees are good and hot. They have many options to explore
: right now.
c*0
35 楼
because
We have discussed about this before, if you just want to get rich, do NOT
work in startup. They chose to take this risk and they should be prepared
for this.
【在 ET 的大作中提到】
: yes, they are free to go whatever they want to go.
: What I said "no way to go" is that they are not like the company two
: founders who have been awarded $3M/each. The employees gets nothing because
: rest of he investment money has been returned back to the investors.
: It's like you give up some better salary opportunity to join this company,
: and hope you can make big bucks after a few years. After two years, you
: found out you made some salary only. Your stock option is worthless.
w*z
37 楼
Joining startup is like gamble.
If you are OK with the pay and enjoy the work, then go for it. Whether you
will get anything from equity is mostly luck. One of my friends who have
done quite a few startups told me that if you join a startup because of the
equity, then 99.9% of the time, you will regret.
because
【在 ET 的大作中提到】
: yes, they are free to go whatever they want to go.
: What I said "no way to go" is that they are not like the company two
: founders who have been awarded $3M/each. The employees gets nothing because
: rest of he investment money has been returned back to the investors.
: It's like you give up some better salary opportunity to join this company,
: and hope you can make big bucks after a few years. After two years, you
: found out you made some salary only. Your stock option is worthless.
If you are OK with the pay and enjoy the work, then go for it. Whether you
will get anything from equity is mostly luck. One of my friends who have
done quite a few startups told me that if you join a startup because of the
equity, then 99.9% of the time, you will regret.
because
【在 ET 的大作中提到】
: yes, they are free to go whatever they want to go.
: What I said "no way to go" is that they are not like the company two
: founders who have been awarded $3M/each. The employees gets nothing because
: rest of he investment money has been returned back to the investors.
: It's like you give up some better salary opportunity to join this company,
: and hope you can make big bucks after a few years. After two years, you
: found out you made some salary only. Your stock option is worthless.
g*g
38 楼
It's like betting lottery with much better odds, you don't always win, but
there's a chance to be rich.
It's much harder to be rich if you join FLG now.
【在 c*******0 的大作中提到】
:
: because
: We have discussed about this before, if you just want to get rich, do NOT
: work in startup. They chose to take this risk and they should be prepared
: for this.
there's a chance to be rich.
It's much harder to be rich if you join FLG now.
【在 c*******0 的大作中提到】
:
: because
: We have discussed about this before, if you just want to get rich, do NOT
: work in startup. They chose to take this risk and they should be prepared
: for this.
ET
39 楼
this is basically not true. We do know some people do get rich by joining a
startup.
it might not be as rich as that you can retire quickly, but you might get
some quick & big bugs to pay off your house.
If I join as a 100+ employee of a company, if the company won't exit as
IPOed, just acquired, I might get less than $300K as the best case. $300K
for a few years, it's like I use $60K($20K less per year) to exchange $300K.
it is still a good deal. As a 100+ employee, we probably have some idea
where this company could be.
【在 c*******0 的大作中提到】
:
: because
: We have discussed about this before, if you just want to get rich, do NOT
: work in startup. They chose to take this risk and they should be prepared
: for this.
startup.
it might not be as rich as that you can retire quickly, but you might get
some quick & big bugs to pay off your house.
If I join as a 100+ employee of a company, if the company won't exit as
IPOed, just acquired, I might get less than $300K as the best case. $300K
for a few years, it's like I use $60K($20K less per year) to exchange $300K.
it is still a good deal. As a 100+ employee, we probably have some idea
where this company could be.
【在 c*******0 的大作中提到】
:
: because
: We have discussed about this before, if you just want to get rich, do NOT
: work in startup. They chose to take this risk and they should be prepared
: for this.
g*g
40 楼
If you can get 150K cash in a startup, you probably can get 250K+ in FLG for
the package. So it's betting 100K every year. So in your example you earn
less.
a
300K.
【在 ET 的大作中提到】
: this is basically not true. We do know some people do get rich by joining a
: startup.
: it might not be as rich as that you can retire quickly, but you might get
: some quick & big bugs to pay off your house.
: If I join as a 100+ employee of a company, if the company won't exit as
: IPOed, just acquired, I might get less than $300K as the best case. $300K
: for a few years, it's like I use $60K($20K less per year) to exchange $300K.
: it is still a good deal. As a 100+ employee, we probably have some idea
: where this company could be.
the package. So it's betting 100K every year. So in your example you earn
less.
a
300K.
【在 ET 的大作中提到】
: this is basically not true. We do know some people do get rich by joining a
: startup.
: it might not be as rich as that you can retire quickly, but you might get
: some quick & big bugs to pay off your house.
: If I join as a 100+ employee of a company, if the company won't exit as
: IPOed, just acquired, I might get less than $300K as the best case. $300K
: for a few years, it's like I use $60K($20K less per year) to exchange $300K.
: it is still a good deal. As a 100+ employee, we probably have some idea
: where this company could be.
c*0
43 楼
I guess your definition of "being rich" is like "being super rich" in my
definition. If so, I agree with you. Startup is pretty much like "being
super rich(IPO or real acquisition)" or burst(close or so-called talent
acquisition). Middle ground is rare case for most normal employees.
【在 g*****g 的大作中提到】
: It's like betting lottery with much better odds, you don't always win, but
: there's a chance to be rich.
: It's much harder to be rich if you join FLG now.
c*0
44 楼
a
300K.
So you do know some people get rich by joining a super hot, promising
startup with 100+ employers. Sure, everybody knows that. Even some people on
this board might go through that pretty soon.
But "Startup" is such a broad term, super hot, promising startup backed by
famous VC is VERY RARE case in startup world. In most cases, you end up
earning less money and get nothing if you are not founder. And if you are
good enough to be hired by Google/Facebook/Twitter when they only have 100
employees, you will be good enough to be a middle level guy to work in big
company with very respectable salary(250k+ per year).
【在 ET 的大作中提到】
: this is basically not true. We do know some people do get rich by joining a
: startup.
: it might not be as rich as that you can retire quickly, but you might get
: some quick & big bugs to pay off your house.
: If I join as a 100+ employee of a company, if the company won't exit as
: IPOed, just acquired, I might get less than $300K as the best case. $300K
: for a few years, it's like I use $60K($20K less per year) to exchange $300K.
: it is still a good deal. As a 100+ employee, we probably have some idea
: where this company could be.
s*k
49 楼
两个founder是某一轮自己搞的钱,结果地下的人全部没有套现?太狠了吧
because
【在 ET 的大作中提到】
: yes, they are free to go whatever they want to go.
: What I said "no way to go" is that they are not like the company two
: founders who have been awarded $3M/each. The employees gets nothing because
: rest of he investment money has been returned back to the investors.
: It's like you give up some better salary opportunity to join this company,
: and hope you can make big bucks after a few years. After two years, you
: found out you made some salary only. Your stock option is worthless.
because
【在 ET 的大作中提到】
: yes, they are free to go whatever they want to go.
: What I said "no way to go" is that they are not like the company two
: founders who have been awarded $3M/each. The employees gets nothing because
: rest of he investment money has been returned back to the investors.
: It's like you give up some better salary opportunity to join this company,
: and hope you can make big bucks after a few years. After two years, you
: found out you made some salary only. Your stock option is worthless.
c*0
51 楼
won'
300K can put you in a secure position to afford a 1.5M house, a nice luxury
car and housewife. That's like top life quality in US already. As an
engineer in SV, you may not think that's rich, but most other people in US
would put you in that category.
【在 g*****g 的大作中提到】
: What do you mean super rich? Small black house is 2M, 300K poverty line won'
: t make you rich at all.
ET
53 楼
come on, as I know, most of startups can offer $150k/year salary for an
experienced key developers.
I don't really know if FLG can offer $250K+/year.
And most important, it's not everyone who can get into FLG.
The chance offered at $150K/year is much bigger than getting into FLG and
also earn $250K/year.
for
【在 g*****g 的大作中提到】
: If you can get 150K cash in a startup, you probably can get 250K+ in FLG for
: the package. So it's betting 100K every year. So in your example you earn
: less.
:
: a
: 300K.
experienced key developers.
I don't really know if FLG can offer $250K+/year.
And most important, it's not everyone who can get into FLG.
The chance offered at $150K/year is much bigger than getting into FLG and
also earn $250K/year.
for
【在 g*****g 的大作中提到】
: If you can get 150K cash in a startup, you probably can get 250K+ in FLG for
: the package. So it's betting 100K every year. So in your example you earn
: less.
:
: a
: 300K.
ET
54 楼
People are realistic enough to calculate what they could get.
For some companies, it's very hard to believe it will go IPO. like I said, I
can trade a few years for $300K or $400K more.
on
【在 c*******0 的大作中提到】
:
: won'
: 300K can put you in a secure position to afford a 1.5M house, a nice luxury
: car and housewife. That's like top life quality in US already. As an
: engineer in SV, you may not think that's rich, but most other people in US
: would put you in that category.
For some companies, it's very hard to believe it will go IPO. like I said, I
can trade a few years for $300K or $400K more.
on
【在 c*******0 的大作中提到】
:
: won'
: 300K can put you in a secure position to afford a 1.5M house, a nice luxury
: car and housewife. That's like top life quality in US already. As an
: engineer in SV, you may not think that's rich, but most other people in US
: would put you in that category.
s*k
55 楼
当年Airbnb融资的时候,那个前FB VP投资人对founder私下靠融资来套现但是不给员工
一点非常不爽啊
http://allthingsd.com/20111001/vcs-unite-chamath-palihapitiya-d
结果现在CEO能套现员工不行已经成标准了?
【在 ET 的大作中提到】
: 那公司没有second market去套现这些options。
: 2个投资人在融上B轮时,有条款让他们能各自拿上$3M
: 现在有些super hot的都有这种条款。snapchat的CEO直接拿走了20M
一点非常不爽啊
http://allthingsd.com/20111001/vcs-unite-chamath-palihapitiya-d
结果现在CEO能套现员工不行已经成标准了?
【在 ET 的大作中提到】
: 那公司没有second market去套现这些options。
: 2个投资人在融上B轮时,有条款让他们能各自拿上$3M
: 现在有些super hot的都有这种条款。snapchat的CEO直接拿走了20M
g*g
56 楼
The way startup works is, even if you are super cow, you won't get much more
on cash, you'll get a lot of more on options though. So you are still
betting 100K your own money, though leverage is higher. And trust me, FLG
can easily offer 300K package for an experienced developer.
Those that can't get into FLG will have harder time to get into hot startups
. Startups are hot not because they offer more cash, it's more equity on
current valuation, which may or may not hit the valuation.
【在 ET 的大作中提到】
: come on, as I know, most of startups can offer $150k/year salary for an
: experienced key developers.
: I don't really know if FLG can offer $250K+/year.
: And most important, it's not everyone who can get into FLG.
: The chance offered at $150K/year is much bigger than getting into FLG and
: also earn $250K/year.
:
: for
on cash, you'll get a lot of more on options though. So you are still
betting 100K your own money, though leverage is higher. And trust me, FLG
can easily offer 300K package for an experienced developer.
Those that can't get into FLG will have harder time to get into hot startups
. Startups are hot not because they offer more cash, it's more equity on
current valuation, which may or may not hit the valuation.
【在 ET 的大作中提到】
: come on, as I know, most of startups can offer $150k/year salary for an
: experienced key developers.
: I don't really know if FLG can offer $250K+/year.
: And most important, it's not everyone who can get into FLG.
: The chance offered at $150K/year is much bigger than getting into FLG and
: also earn $250K/year.
:
: for
c*0
57 楼
Most people who are able to join a very good early stage startup can always
join FLG. The stories you read about "being rejected by FLG and then shined
in startup" are real, but very rare.
If the person you are trying to hire for your startup don't have or can not
have FLG options, then you are probably looking at the wrong person.
【在 ET 的大作中提到】
: come on, as I know, most of startups can offer $150k/year salary for an
: experienced key developers.
: I don't really know if FLG can offer $250K+/year.
: And most important, it's not everyone who can get into FLG.
: The chance offered at $150K/year is much bigger than getting into FLG and
: also earn $250K/year.
:
: for
ET
58 楼
it's a term the foundres can neogiate with investors and also some investors
like to pay founders cash to get more equity.
not sure if it's a standard but it happens.
【在 s********k 的大作中提到】
: 当年Airbnb融资的时候,那个前FB VP投资人对founder私下靠融资来套现但是不给员工
: 一点非常不爽啊
: http://allthingsd.com/20111001/vcs-unite-chamath-palihapitiya-d
: 结果现在CEO能套现员工不行已经成标准了?
like to pay founders cash to get more equity.
not sure if it's a standard but it happens.
【在 s********k 的大作中提到】
: 当年Airbnb融资的时候,那个前FB VP投资人对founder私下靠融资来套现但是不给员工
: 一点非常不爽啊
: http://allthingsd.com/20111001/vcs-unite-chamath-palihapitiya-d
: 结果现在CEO能套现员工不行已经成标准了?
ET
59 楼
You guys live at Silicon Valley probably you know better than me.
Look at the angellist.com, you can see the expected salary in some "hot"
companies.
The hot companies don't not always mean Uber, Airbnb kind of hot. It might
mean the company has a reasonable revenune and profit. has a promising exist
strategy.
I give you a few examples, Polyvore, making money from the beginning (two
chinese founders), jobs2careers.com, just met its CEO last night. They don't
pay $250k/year for its engineers but they are very profitable.
I am talking about the majorities of health startups, not a few unicorns.
always
shined
not
【在 c*******0 的大作中提到】
:
: Most people who are able to join a very good early stage startup can always
: join FLG. The stories you read about "being rejected by FLG and then shined
: in startup" are real, but very rare.
: If the person you are trying to hire for your startup don't have or can not
: have FLG options, then you are probably looking at the wrong person.
Look at the angellist.com, you can see the expected salary in some "hot"
companies.
The hot companies don't not always mean Uber, Airbnb kind of hot. It might
mean the company has a reasonable revenune and profit. has a promising exist
strategy.
I give you a few examples, Polyvore, making money from the beginning (two
chinese founders), jobs2careers.com, just met its CEO last night. They don't
pay $250k/year for its engineers but they are very profitable.
I am talking about the majorities of health startups, not a few unicorns.
always
shined
not
【在 c*******0 的大作中提到】
:
: Most people who are able to join a very good early stage startup can always
: join FLG. The stories you read about "being rejected by FLG and then shined
: in startup" are real, but very rare.
: If the person you are trying to hire for your startup don't have or can not
: have FLG options, then you are probably looking at the wrong person.
w*z
60 楼
250k is excessive. for base, a well funded company should be able to pay a
key engineer maybe 180-200k
exist
't
【在 ET 的大作中提到】
: You guys live at Silicon Valley probably you know better than me.
: Look at the angellist.com, you can see the expected salary in some "hot"
: companies.
: The hot companies don't not always mean Uber, Airbnb kind of hot. It might
: mean the company has a reasonable revenune and profit. has a promising exist
: strategy.
: I give you a few examples, Polyvore, making money from the beginning (two
: chinese founders), jobs2careers.com, just met its CEO last night. They don't
: pay $250k/year for its engineers but they are very profitable.
: I am talking about the majorities of health startups, not a few unicorns.
key engineer maybe 180-200k
exist
't
【在 ET 的大作中提到】
: You guys live at Silicon Valley probably you know better than me.
: Look at the angellist.com, you can see the expected salary in some "hot"
: companies.
: The hot companies don't not always mean Uber, Airbnb kind of hot. It might
: mean the company has a reasonable revenune and profit. has a promising exist
: strategy.
: I give you a few examples, Polyvore, making money from the beginning (two
: chinese founders), jobs2careers.com, just met its CEO last night. They don't
: pay $250k/year for its engineers but they are very profitable.
: I am talking about the majorities of health startups, not a few unicorns.
w*z
61 楼
the way FLG interview people is ridiculous.
always
shined
not
【在 c*******0 的大作中提到】
:
: Most people who are able to join a very good early stage startup can always
: join FLG. The stories you read about "being rejected by FLG and then shined
: in startup" are real, but very rare.
: If the person you are trying to hire for your startup don't have or can not
: have FLG options, then you are probably looking at the wrong person.
always
shined
not
【在 c*******0 的大作中提到】
:
: Most people who are able to join a very good early stage startup can always
: join FLG. The stories you read about "being rejected by FLG and then shined
: in startup" are real, but very rare.
: If the person you are trying to hire for your startup don't have or can not
: have FLG options, then you are probably looking at the wrong person.
w*z
62 楼
I think it is common nowadays. founders are able to cash out some of the
shares during the VC
rounds. it is good for both sides, not employees though.
investors
【在 ET 的大作中提到】
: it's a term the foundres can neogiate with investors and also some investors
: like to pay founders cash to get more equity.
: not sure if it's a standard but it happens.
shares during the VC
rounds. it is good for both sides, not employees though.
investors
【在 ET 的大作中提到】
: it's a term the foundres can neogiate with investors and also some investors
: like to pay founders cash to get more equity.
: not sure if it's a standard but it happens.
w*z
63 楼
I am debating between the late stage startup vs early stage, all about risk
and reward.
more
startups
【在 g*****g 的大作中提到】
: The way startup works is, even if you are super cow, you won't get much more
: on cash, you'll get a lot of more on options though. So you are still
: betting 100K your own money, though leverage is higher. And trust me, FLG
: can easily offer 300K package for an experienced developer.
: Those that can't get into FLG will have harder time to get into hot startups
: . Startups are hot not because they offer more cash, it's more equity on
: current valuation, which may or may not hit the valuation.
and reward.
more
startups
【在 g*****g 的大作中提到】
: The way startup works is, even if you are super cow, you won't get much more
: on cash, you'll get a lot of more on options though. So you are still
: betting 100K your own money, though leverage is higher. And trust me, FLG
: can easily offer 300K package for an experienced developer.
: Those that can't get into FLG will have harder time to get into hot startups
: . Startups are hot not because they offer more cash, it's more equity on
: current valuation, which may or may not hit the valuation.
c*0
66 楼
exist
't
I have no doubt about your $150K/year in hot startup. Polyvore is certainly
one of the hot startups. but good engineers in Polyvore will certainly be
able to get FLG offer(most of their early engineers may actually come from
big companies) and have good chance of getting 250K/year.
Polyvore is founded at 2007. Say you join Polyvore at its fourth year(2010),
until today it's 5 years already. You earn 100k less there for 5 years.
Assume that Polyvore exit in 6 month in normal way and the evaluation is
200M(estimated based on their C series), you would need 0.25% equity after
two rounds of dilution to just break even, under the condition that it's not
a term intentionally benefits VC and founders more.
Of course the acquisition offer is very likely to be higher but your equity
might well be lower as an employee joining at 4th year. And even if in the
end of day you get more money than that, it's not significantly more and you
work so much harder during the 5 years.
The best case for startup employees to get super rich is that your company
becomes unicorn. In most other scenarios, money-wise you get marginally
better return at most, and much more likely you end up losing money.
So my point is, if you just want to become rich by doing startup, you either
becomes founder or super early employee in high level position, or you join
a unicorn startup(mid-late stage). Otherwise, you join not because of money
, but other things.
【在 ET 的大作中提到】
: You guys live at Silicon Valley probably you know better than me.
: Look at the angellist.com, you can see the expected salary in some "hot"
: companies.
: The hot companies don't not always mean Uber, Airbnb kind of hot. It might
: mean the company has a reasonable revenune and profit. has a promising exist
: strategy.
: I give you a few examples, Polyvore, making money from the beginning (two
: chinese founders), jobs2careers.com, just met its CEO last night. They don't
: pay $250k/year for its engineers but they are very profitable.
: I am talking about the majorities of health startups, not a few unicorns.
w*z
67 楼
I will have to agree with you this time.
certainly
),
【在 c*******0 的大作中提到】
:
: exist
: 't
: I have no doubt about your $150K/year in hot startup. Polyvore is certainly
: one of the hot startups. but good engineers in Polyvore will certainly be
: able to get FLG offer(most of their early engineers may actually come from
: big companies) and have good chance of getting 250K/year.
: Polyvore is founded at 2007. Say you join Polyvore at its fourth year(2010),
: until today it's 5 years already. You earn 100k less there for 5 years.
: Assume that Polyvore exit in 6 month in normal way and the evaluation is
certainly
),
【在 c*******0 的大作中提到】
:
: exist
: 't
: I have no doubt about your $150K/year in hot startup. Polyvore is certainly
: one of the hot startups. but good engineers in Polyvore will certainly be
: able to get FLG offer(most of their early engineers may actually come from
: big companies) and have good chance of getting 250K/year.
: Polyvore is founded at 2007. Say you join Polyvore at its fourth year(2010),
: until today it's 5 years already. You earn 100k less there for 5 years.
: Assume that Polyvore exit in 6 month in normal way and the evaluation is
D*a
68 楼
明白人呀
更何况2010年无论进FLG任何一家,现在equity上都远不只500k收益了
连peter thiel都说了其实对很多牛人来说,去大公司都是更实惠的选择
certainly
),
【在 c*******0 的大作中提到】
:
: exist
: 't
: I have no doubt about your $150K/year in hot startup. Polyvore is certainly
: one of the hot startups. but good engineers in Polyvore will certainly be
: able to get FLG offer(most of their early engineers may actually come from
: big companies) and have good chance of getting 250K/year.
: Polyvore is founded at 2007. Say you join Polyvore at its fourth year(2010),
: until today it's 5 years already. You earn 100k less there for 5 years.
: Assume that Polyvore exit in 6 month in normal way and the evaluation is
更何况2010年无论进FLG任何一家,现在equity上都远不只500k收益了
连peter thiel都说了其实对很多牛人来说,去大公司都是更实惠的选择
certainly
),
【在 c*******0 的大作中提到】
:
: exist
: 't
: I have no doubt about your $150K/year in hot startup. Polyvore is certainly
: one of the hot startups. but good engineers in Polyvore will certainly be
: able to get FLG offer(most of their early engineers may actually come from
: big companies) and have good chance of getting 250K/year.
: Polyvore is founded at 2007. Say you join Polyvore at its fourth year(2010),
: until today it's 5 years already. You earn 100k less there for 5 years.
: Assume that Polyvore exit in 6 month in normal way and the evaluation is
h*a
73 楼
说的很有道理。
certainly
),
【在 c*******0 的大作中提到】
:
: exist
: 't
: I have no doubt about your $150K/year in hot startup. Polyvore is certainly
: one of the hot startups. but good engineers in Polyvore will certainly be
: able to get FLG offer(most of their early engineers may actually come from
: big companies) and have good chance of getting 250K/year.
: Polyvore is founded at 2007. Say you join Polyvore at its fourth year(2010),
: until today it's 5 years already. You earn 100k less there for 5 years.
: Assume that Polyvore exit in 6 month in normal way and the evaluation is
certainly
),
【在 c*******0 的大作中提到】
:
: exist
: 't
: I have no doubt about your $150K/year in hot startup. Polyvore is certainly
: one of the hot startups. but good engineers in Polyvore will certainly be
: able to get FLG offer(most of their early engineers may actually come from
: big companies) and have good chance of getting 250K/year.
: Polyvore is founded at 2007. Say you join Polyvore at its fourth year(2010),
: until today it's 5 years already. You earn 100k less there for 5 years.
: Assume that Polyvore exit in 6 month in normal way and the evaluation is
D*u
76 楼
exit in 6 month 真准!
certainly
),
【在 c*******0 的大作中提到】
:
: exist
: 't
: I have no doubt about your $150K/year in hot startup. Polyvore is certainly
: one of the hot startups. but good engineers in Polyvore will certainly be
: able to get FLG offer(most of their early engineers may actually come from
: big companies) and have good chance of getting 250K/year.
: Polyvore is founded at 2007. Say you join Polyvore at its fourth year(2010),
: until today it's 5 years already. You earn 100k less there for 5 years.
: Assume that Polyvore exit in 6 month in normal way and the evaluation is
certainly
),
【在 c*******0 的大作中提到】
:
: exist
: 't
: I have no doubt about your $150K/year in hot startup. Polyvore is certainly
: one of the hot startups. but good engineers in Polyvore will certainly be
: able to get FLG offer(most of their early engineers may actually come from
: big companies) and have good chance of getting 250K/year.
: Polyvore is founded at 2007. Say you join Polyvore at its fourth year(2010),
: until today it's 5 years already. You earn 100k less there for 5 years.
: Assume that Polyvore exit in 6 month in normal way and the evaluation is
h*b
79 楼
正解。
我最近看了几个startup,算上福利基本上一年少五万到十万现金收入,当真是拿自己
钱玩option了。 牺牲工作稳
定性,大幅度延长工作时间。
作为普通员工,你在flg工作,拿多出来的钱投资,十个有九个startup员工都难以抗衡。
for
【在 g*****g 的大作中提到】
: If you can get 150K cash in a startup, you probably can get 250K+ in FLG for
: the package. So it's betting 100K every year. So in your example you earn
: less.
:
: a
: 300K.
我最近看了几个startup,算上福利基本上一年少五万到十万现金收入,当真是拿自己
钱玩option了。 牺牲工作稳
定性,大幅度延长工作时间。
作为普通员工,你在flg工作,拿多出来的钱投资,十个有九个startup员工都难以抗衡。
for
【在 g*****g 的大作中提到】
: If you can get 150K cash in a startup, you probably can get 250K+ in FLG for
: the package. So it's betting 100K every year. So in your example you earn
: less.
:
: a
: 300K.
b*e
80 楼
我顶一下这个。有理有据。
certainly
),
【在 c*******0 的大作中提到】
:
: exist
: 't
: I have no doubt about your $150K/year in hot startup. Polyvore is certainly
: one of the hot startups. but good engineers in Polyvore will certainly be
: able to get FLG offer(most of their early engineers may actually come from
: big companies) and have good chance of getting 250K/year.
: Polyvore is founded at 2007. Say you join Polyvore at its fourth year(2010),
: until today it's 5 years already. You earn 100k less there for 5 years.
: Assume that Polyvore exit in 6 month in normal way and the evaluation is
certainly
),
【在 c*******0 的大作中提到】
:
: exist
: 't
: I have no doubt about your $150K/year in hot startup. Polyvore is certainly
: one of the hot startups. but good engineers in Polyvore will certainly be
: able to get FLG offer(most of their early engineers may actually come from
: big companies) and have good chance of getting 250K/year.
: Polyvore is founded at 2007. Say you join Polyvore at its fourth year(2010),
: until today it's 5 years already. You earn 100k less there for 5 years.
: Assume that Polyvore exit in 6 month in normal way and the evaluation is
相关阅读
paper help今天去看了心理医生同济大学化学系有机化学方向招聘助理教授 (转载)求审稿机会,小弟物理博士,方向是纳米材料生长表征,磁性材料,纳米器件应用,多谢!真诚求offer比较,industry vs 教职做化学人, 人到中年可以养家糊口吗?anyone going to pittcon this year wanna a weekend stay at a florida beach?paper help please求审稿,蛋白质谱 分析化学方向湾区工作机会今年去pittcon的有找室友的吗有愿意审稿的吗?求文献, 谢谢。请问版上有教高中化学的吗?做固体化学的能去干啥大家还在实验室吗?++++++++Molecular Physics Paper Help+++++++++今天又拒绝了一个 送上门来的小留求paper,多谢!回国工作机会