avatar
m*n
1
Just read one article about Whidbey talking about generic types in functions,
classes to make intellisense work etc. Anyone would like to discuss about it?
Will it be first used in VB 8.0? When will VB 8.0 be released?
avatar
C*n
2
Whidbey is GREAT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
It offers much more than I expected.
I will make a MSDN subscription if I have to.

functions,
it?

【在 m*******n 的大作中提到】
: Just read one article about Whidbey talking about generic types in functions,
: classes to make intellisense work etc. Anyone would like to discuss about it?
: Will it be first used in VB 8.0? When will VB 8.0 be released?

avatar
L*r
3
你来说说whidbey好不好? :)
如果不触及你的商业机密,顺便给大家说说它怎样优化了你的系统设计。如何?
avatar
L*r
4
希望MS真的release的时候会和他promise的一样好。呵呵

【在 C****n 的大作中提到】
: Whidbey is GREAT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
: It offers much more than I expected.
: I will make a MSDN subscription if I have to.
:
: functions,
: it?

avatar
j*g
5
http://www.asp.net/whidbey/
gotdotnet should also have some information.

【在 m*******n 的大作中提到】
: Just read one article about Whidbey talking about generic types in functions,
: classes to make intellisense work etc. Anyone would like to discuss about it?
: Will it be first used in VB 8.0? When will VB 8.0 be released?

avatar
C*n
6
The Whidbey Alpha is already impressive enough for me to pay $1000 to buy it.

about

【在 L*******r 的大作中提到】
: 希望MS真的release的时候会和他promise的一样好。呵呵
avatar
j*i
7
Whidbey is planned to be released in P2 FY2004.
The code name includes the release of C++, C#, VB, J#,
VSS 2004, and .NET FX v2.0.
A new C++ syntax (MC^2) will be introduced in Whidbey,
which is a pure managed language (runs completely on GC
heap). As far as intellisense goes, it's hard to predict
how good it will be at this time. We just hope it can
meet people's expectation.
HTH.

【在 m*******n 的大作中提到】
: Just read one article about Whidbey talking about generic types in functions,
: classes to make intellisense work etc. Anyone would like to discuss about it?
: Will it be first used in VB 8.0? When will VB 8.0 be released?

avatar
p*n
8
just came back from a presentation by a MSFT MVP
about Whidbey and Yukon. It was really cool.
i really like the new Edit and Run feature.
Design,development and deployment became so much
easier compared to what we have in 1.x.
Yukon is in Beta now but Whidbey is still in Alpha.
and it is not quite stable yet. it crashed several
times in the 2.5-hour presentation.

【在 C****n 的大作中提到】
: The Whidbey Alpha is already impressive enough for me to pay $1000 to buy it.
:
: about

avatar
L*r
9

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
演讲人估计巨不爽. :)
it.

【在 p***n 的大作中提到】
: just came back from a presentation by a MSFT MVP
: about Whidbey and Yukon. It was really cool.
: i really like the new Edit and Run feature.
: Design,development and deployment became so much
: easier compared to what we have in 1.x.
: Yukon is in Beta now but Whidbey is still in Alpha.
: and it is not quite stable yet. it crashed several
: times in the 2.5-hour presentation.

avatar
C*n
10

What are you expecting, it's Alpha. people can accept that.
MS maybe suck before, but on Whidbey, man, it rocks.
I don't like Yukon very much though.
It's definitely a lock down. You will never be able to switch to other
database vendor once you started with Yukon.
There has to be a ISO-9000 or some committee to regulate the database
behavior, so SQL server/Oracle can compete fairly, though Oracle sucks, but MS
strategy is too agressive.
We have the C# standardized, when can we have RDBMS stand

【在 L*******r 的大作中提到】
:
: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
: 演讲人估计巨不爽. :)
: it.

avatar
k*i
11

MS
???funny thing,so you think microsfot sql server is better than oracle?

【在 C****n 的大作中提到】
:
: What are you expecting, it's Alpha. people can accept that.
: MS maybe suck before, but on Whidbey, man, it rocks.
: I don't like Yukon very much though.
: It's definitely a lock down. You will never be able to switch to other
: database vendor once you started with Yukon.
: There has to be a ISO-9000 or some committee to regulate the database
: behavior, so SQL server/Oracle can compete fairly, though Oracle sucks, but MS
: strategy is too agressive.
: We have the C# standardized, when can we have RDBMS stand

avatar
p*n
12
RDBMS doesn't have to be standardized but rather the languages used
by RDBMS could.
相关阅读
logo
联系我们隐私协议©2024 redian.news
Redian新闻
Redian.news刊载任何文章,不代表同意其说法或描述,仅为提供更多信息,也不构成任何建议。文章信息的合法性及真实性由其作者负责,与Redian.news及其运营公司无关。欢迎投稿,如发现稿件侵权,或作者不愿在本网发表文章,请版权拥有者通知本网处理。