如何确定雇主违反移民法（一个保护EB3权利的有利逻辑）# EB23 - 劳工卡
n*m
1 楼
(Here is another idea to fight against the violation of EB3 right in fair
chance of obtaining GC, people interested in should fill more details based
on this draft and incorporate to your own letter. I think the logic is very
clear here why it is fraud. Let's take actions)
Dear USCIS,
It has brought my attention that a large number of EB3 petitions have
been submitted on behalf of foreign beneficiaries who have already been
grantd EB2 petitions by USCIS. I believe that these petitions are fraud
committed against the immigration laws and regulations.
>>>>>>>>>>>
There are three strong indications that these foreign worker employers (aka
petitioners) have committed fraud against immigrations laws and regulations.
The first evidence is the large number of EB3 petitions filed based on
previously approven EB2 petitions. It is understandable that occasionally a
mistake may happen and needs to be amended. If a petitioner submitted
multiple petitions for the same beneficiaries, especially as new petitions (
amend box in I-140 not checked), it is reasonable to beleive that this
petitioner has used substandard, if not fake, recruitment process to hire
foreign workers. Simply put, there should NOT be so many "mistakes" made by
the same company.
The second evidence is that all these EB3 petitions are only submitted for
foreign worker born in China. If a position should be classified as EB3, all
similar positions, without regarding who occupy and which foreign country
they are from, should ALL be classified consistently as EB3. However, it is
very easy to identify that these compmanies only filed petitions for foreign
workers born in China while the rest of foreign worker born in other
countries are still remaining in EB2. This is single most important evidence
supporting the accusation that these companies committed fraud against
immigration lasws and regulations. Further, it can also be identified that
the peitions were only made for those whose priority date is current for EB3
classification while no petitions were filed for the remaining EB2 whose
priority date has not been current yet.
The third evidence is that these companies continue applying EB2 petitions
for new employment with positions similar to the ones they have just
submitted as EB3. This is an equally important evidence indicating
fraudulent behavior.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
Based on all these evidence, I believe USCIS should investigate if fraud has
been committed and I keep my right to contact higher governmental agencies
if the matter is not properly handled.
chance of obtaining GC, people interested in should fill more details based
on this draft and incorporate to your own letter. I think the logic is very
clear here why it is fraud. Let's take actions)
Dear USCIS,
It has brought my attention that a large number of EB3 petitions have
been submitted on behalf of foreign beneficiaries who have already been
grantd EB2 petitions by USCIS. I believe that these petitions are fraud
committed against the immigration laws and regulations.
>>>>>>>>>>>
There are three strong indications that these foreign worker employers (aka
petitioners) have committed fraud against immigrations laws and regulations.
The first evidence is the large number of EB3 petitions filed based on
previously approven EB2 petitions. It is understandable that occasionally a
mistake may happen and needs to be amended. If a petitioner submitted
multiple petitions for the same beneficiaries, especially as new petitions (
amend box in I-140 not checked), it is reasonable to beleive that this
petitioner has used substandard, if not fake, recruitment process to hire
foreign workers. Simply put, there should NOT be so many "mistakes" made by
the same company.
The second evidence is that all these EB3 petitions are only submitted for
foreign worker born in China. If a position should be classified as EB3, all
similar positions, without regarding who occupy and which foreign country
they are from, should ALL be classified consistently as EB3. However, it is
very easy to identify that these compmanies only filed petitions for foreign
workers born in China while the rest of foreign worker born in other
countries are still remaining in EB2. This is single most important evidence
supporting the accusation that these companies committed fraud against
immigration lasws and regulations. Further, it can also be identified that
the peitions were only made for those whose priority date is current for EB3
classification while no petitions were filed for the remaining EB2 whose
priority date has not been current yet.
The third evidence is that these companies continue applying EB2 petitions
for new employment with positions similar to the ones they have just
submitted as EB3. This is an equally important evidence indicating
fraudulent behavior.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
Based on all these evidence, I believe USCIS should investigate if fraud has
been committed and I keep my right to contact higher governmental agencies
if the matter is not properly handled.
