m*i
2 楼
https://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2014/12/30/2014-30641/immigration-
policy-requests-for-information
https://s3.amazonaws.com/public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2014-30641.
pdf
尤其第15条和16条，只有时态上的区别，也就是说也在征集如何利用以前浪费的visa
number
15. What are the most important policy and operational changes, if any,
available within the existing statutory framework to ensure that
administrative policies, practices, and systems fully and fairly allocate
all of the immigrant visa numbers that Congress provides for and
intends to be issued each year going forward?
16. What are the most important policy and operational changes, if any,
available within the existing statutory framework to ensure that
administrative policies, practices, and systems fully and fairly allocate
all of the immigrant visa numbers that Congress provided for and
intended to be issued, but were not issued in past years?
...
this RFI, are not focused on potential
Federal Government actions that were announced as part of the President’s
Immigration Accountability Executive Actions of November 20. Rather, this
RFI seeks recommendations on 3 improving and modernizing the legal
immigration
system in other ways. F
...
What are the most important policy and operational changes that would
streamline and improve the processing of immigrant visas at U.S. Embassies
and Consulates, for both family-sponsored and employment-based immigrant
visas?
...
What are the most important policy and operational changes that would
streamline and improve the process of applying for adjustment of status
to that of a lawful permanent resident while in the United States?
policy-requests-for-information
https://s3.amazonaws.com/public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2014-30641.
尤其第15条和16条，只有时态上的区别，也就是说也在征集如何利用以前浪费的visa
number
15. What are the most important policy and operational changes, if any,
available within the existing statutory framework to ensure that
administrative policies, practices, and systems fully and fairly allocate
all of the immigrant visa numbers that Congress provides for and
intends to be issued each year going forward?
16. What are the most important policy and operational changes, if any,
available within the existing statutory framework to ensure that
administrative policies, practices, and systems fully and fairly allocate
all of the immigrant visa numbers that Congress provided for and
intended to be issued, but were not issued in past years?
...
this RFI, are not focused on potential
Federal Government actions that were announced as part of the President’s
Immigration Accountability Executive Actions of November 20. Rather, this
RFI seeks recommendations on 3 improving and modernizing the legal
immigration
system in other ways. F
...
What are the most important policy and operational changes that would
streamline and improve the processing of immigrant visas at U.S. Embassies
and Consulates, for both family-sponsored and employment-based immigrant
visas?
...
What are the most important policy and operational changes that would
streamline and improve the process of applying for adjustment of status
to that of a lawful permanent resident while in the United States?
e*r
3 楼
是paper 嘛，直接google translate
【在 R******a 的大作中提到】
: 翻译稿需要其它懂中文的人签字吗?
: 谢谢!
【在 R******a 的大作中提到】
: 翻译稿需要其它懂中文的人签字吗?
: 谢谢!
l*n
4 楼
第一个link， 需点 “pre-publication PDF version.”才可以看到。
R*a
5 楼
不是,是在国内的一个获奖证书.
是不是自己直接翻译一下就行吗?
是不是自己直接翻译一下就行吗?
B*n
6 楼
能不能。。。排个版。。。
F*r
7 楼
明天就将正式发布。所有EB China应该上去要求140 pre-register status.
【在 m****i 的大作中提到】
: https://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2014/12/30/2014-30641/immigration-
: policy-requests-for-information
: https://s3.amazonaws.com/public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2014-30641.
: 尤其第15条和16条，只有时态上的区别，也就是说也在征集如何利用以前浪费的visa
: number
: 15. What are the most important policy and operational changes, if any,
: available within the existing statutory framework to ensure that
: administrative policies, practices, and systems fully and fairly allocate
: all of the immigrant visa numbers that Congress provides for and
d*p
8 楼
如果能够提前提交485，这个是对大家最好的，不管是fb还是eb,不管是哪个类别的
b*g
9 楼
感觉民主党要抢先在共和党前面出台EA，应该是好事吧。
c*k
10 楼
现在就看谁快了。
两党争着抢immigration reform的credit,对EB是很有利的。
希望越快越好。
短期目标，485 pre-registration, H4 EAD （1-3 months)
中期：民主党和DHS来个recapture, 全C (2-4 months)
长期：共和党出个STEM Green Card加上点non-legal捆绑，希望两党有共识，很难。 (
6-12months)
【在 b*******g 的大作中提到】
: 感觉民主党要抢先在共和党前面出台EA，应该是好事吧。
两党争着抢immigration reform的credit,对EB是很有利的。
希望越快越好。
短期目标，485 pre-registration, H4 EAD （1-3 months)
中期：民主党和DHS来个recapture, 全C (2-4 months)
长期：共和党出个STEM Green Card加上点non-legal捆绑，希望两党有共识，很难。 (
6-12months)
【在 b*******g 的大作中提到】
: 感觉民主党要抢先在共和党前面出台EA，应该是好事吧。
t*n
11 楼
托你吉言，等着交了485回国呢
(
【在 c******k 的大作中提到】
: 现在就看谁快了。
: 两党争着抢immigration reform的credit,对EB是很有利的。
: 希望越快越好。
: 短期目标，485 pre-registration, H4 EAD （1-3 months)
: 中期：民主党和DHS来个recapture, 全C (2-4 months)
: 长期：共和党出个STEM Green Card加上点non-legal捆绑，希望两党有共识，很难。 (
: 6-12months)
(
【在 c******k 的大作中提到】
: 现在就看谁快了。
: 两党争着抢immigration reform的credit,对EB是很有利的。
: 希望越快越好。
: 短期目标，485 pre-registration, H4 EAD （1-3 months)
: 中期：民主党和DHS来个recapture, 全C (2-4 months)
: 长期：共和党出个STEM Green Card加上点non-legal捆绑，希望两党有共识，很难。 (
: 6-12months)
b*g
12 楼
一样一样的。
【在 t********n 的大作中提到】
: 托你吉言，等着交了485回国呢
:
: (
【在 t********n 的大作中提到】
: 托你吉言，等着交了485回国呢
:
: (
y*3
13 楼
希望是真的。
(
★ 发自iPhone App: ChineseWeb 8.7
【在 c******k 的大作中提到】
: 现在就看谁快了。
: 两党争着抢immigration reform的credit,对EB是很有利的。
: 希望越快越好。
: 短期目标，485 pre-registration, H4 EAD （1-3 months)
: 中期：民主党和DHS来个recapture, 全C (2-4 months)
: 长期：共和党出个STEM Green Card加上点non-legal捆绑，希望两党有共识，很难。 (
: 6-12months)
(
★ 发自iPhone App: ChineseWeb 8.7
【在 c******k 的大作中提到】
: 现在就看谁快了。
: 两党争着抢immigration reform的credit,对EB是很有利的。
: 希望越快越好。
: 短期目标，485 pre-registration, H4 EAD （1-3 months)
: 中期：民主党和DHS来个recapture, 全C (2-4 months)
: 长期：共和党出个STEM Green Card加上点non-legal捆绑，希望两党有共识，很难。 (
: 6-12months)
p*i
14 楼
还以为会直接出proposed rule呢。。。
w*i
15 楼
NIU呢？能不能组织一下，代表中国的EBs发一下 comments? 稿件可以放上来大家
review一下。
【在 m****i 的大作中提到】
: https://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2014/12/30/2014-30641/immigration-
: policy-requests-for-information
: https://s3.amazonaws.com/public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2014-30641.
: pdf
: 尤其第15条和16条，只有时态上的区别，也就是说也在征集如何利用以前浪费的visa
: number
: 15. What are the most important policy and operational changes, if any,
: available within the existing statutory framework to ensure that
: administrative policies, practices, and systems fully and fairly allocate
: all of the immigrant visa numbers that Congress provides for and
review一下。
【在 m****i 的大作中提到】
: https://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2014/12/30/2014-30641/immigration-
: policy-requests-for-information
: https://s3.amazonaws.com/public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2014-30641.
: 尤其第15条和16条，只有时态上的区别，也就是说也在征集如何利用以前浪费的visa
: number
: 15. What are the most important policy and operational changes, if any,
: available within the existing statutory framework to ensure that
: administrative policies, practices, and systems fully and fairly allocate
: all of the immigrant visa numbers that Congress provides for and
F*r
16 楼
(
需要大家行动起来。
【在 c******k 的大作中提到】
: 现在就看谁快了。
: 两党争着抢immigration reform的credit,对EB是很有利的。
: 希望越快越好。
: 短期目标，485 pre-registration, H4 EAD （1-3 months)
: 中期：民主党和DHS来个recapture, 全C (2-4 months)
: 长期：共和党出个STEM Green Card加上点non-legal捆绑，希望两党有共识，很难。 (
: 6-12months)
s*a
17 楼
这是向genenal public征集意见？“。。。within the existing statutory
framework。。。”，gen pub懂个毛？
或者说就是需要走个public notice的过场？其实actions 包括"preferred" actions已
经defined?
framework。。。”，gen pub懂个毛？
或者说就是需要走个public notice的过场？其实actions 包括"preferred" actions已
经defined?
h*e
18 楼
提前交485混个EAD固然好，但最好的无疑是让大家真正的交485，真正拿到绿卡才是最
好的。
希望所有遗忘浪费的名额能按国别分给大家，让更多EB真的绿起来。
【在 d*******p 的大作中提到】
: 如果能够提前提交485，这个是对大家最好的，不管是fb还是eb,不管是哪个类别的
好的。
希望所有遗忘浪费的名额能按国别分给大家，让更多EB真的绿起来。
【在 d*******p 的大作中提到】
: 如果能够提前提交485，这个是对大家最好的，不管是fb还是eb,不管是哪个类别的
m*i
19 楼
征集文章中提到了fairly allocate，就看大家怎么解释fairly了。是按国别分配fair
还是按PD先后fair。
还是按PD先后fair。
w*i
20 楼
不管怎么分都是全 C
fair
【在 m****i 的大作中提到】
: 征集文章中提到了fairly allocate，就看大家怎么解释fairly了。是按国别分配fair
: 还是按PD先后fair。
fair
【在 m****i 的大作中提到】
: 征集文章中提到了fairly allocate，就看大家怎么解释fairly了。是按国别分配fair
: 还是按PD先后fair。
a*m
21 楼
按pd fair等于全给烙印呀，最不fair了。
fair
【在 m****i 的大作中提到】
: 征集文章中提到了fairly allocate，就看大家怎么解释fairly了。是按国别分配fair
: 还是按PD先后fair。
fair
【在 m****i 的大作中提到】
: 征集文章中提到了fairly allocate，就看大家怎么解释fairly了。是按国别分配fair
: 还是按PD先后fair。
p*i
22 楼
理论上就是走个过场
之前的action白宫都已经brief给aila，iv之类的组织了
想必dhs和dos在报请obama之前内部研究过
但问题是，这个过场也要走很久。。。
【在 s****a 的大作中提到】
: 这是向genenal public征集意见？“。。。within the existing statutory
: framework。。。”，gen pub懂个毛？
: 或者说就是需要走个public notice的过场？其实actions 包括"preferred" actions已
: 经defined?
之前的action白宫都已经brief给aila，iv之类的组织了
想必dhs和dos在报请obama之前内部研究过
但问题是，这个过场也要走很久。。。
【在 s****a 的大作中提到】
: 这是向genenal public征集意见？“。。。within the existing statutory
: framework。。。”，gen pub懂个毛？
: 或者说就是需要走个public notice的过场？其实actions 包括"preferred" actions已
: 经defined?
s*a
23 楼
这个request for info只要求了30天，还凑合。希望这个period完了以后，不要再走
rule making process.
【在 p******i 的大作中提到】
: 理论上就是走个过场
: 之前的action白宫都已经brief给aila，iv之类的组织了
: 想必dhs和dos在报请obama之前内部研究过
: 但问题是，这个过场也要走很久。。。
rule making process.
【在 p******i 的大作中提到】
: 理论上就是走个过场
: 之前的action白宫都已经brief给aila，iv之类的组织了
: 想必dhs和dos在报请obama之前内部研究过
: 但问题是，这个过场也要走很久。。。
p*i
24 楼
老印的悲观估计：
1. Tomorrow comment period open (30 days)
2. Review all comments and produce bunch or rules (60 days review)
3. Propose Rules via regulatory process ( In April)
4. Will go through OMB Review process (90 Days standard time, it took 2 year
for H4 EAD rules)
5. After OMB approval USCIS will open for comments period ( 60 Days standard
)
6. USCIS will review all comments and produce final rule ( No time limit, H4
EAD took 6 month and still in review)
7. OMB will review final rule ( 90 Days standard time )
8. After OMB approval USCIS will publish Final rule on FR with effective
date ( 30 Days standard time for effective date after publish on FR)
This is what we learnt from existing painful regulatory process... no rush
at all...
1. Tomorrow comment period open (30 days)
2. Review all comments and produce bunch or rules (60 days review)
3. Propose Rules via regulatory process ( In April)
4. Will go through OMB Review process (90 Days standard time, it took 2 year
for H4 EAD rules)
5. After OMB approval USCIS will open for comments period ( 60 Days standard
)
6. USCIS will review all comments and produce final rule ( No time limit, H4
EAD took 6 month and still in review)
7. OMB will review final rule ( 90 Days standard time )
8. After OMB approval USCIS will publish Final rule on FR with effective
date ( 30 Days standard time for effective date after publish on FR)
This is what we learnt from existing painful regulatory process... no rush
at all...
p*i
25 楼
老印的乐观估计：
Here is an optimistic projection,
If the POTUS wants it, the Timeline could also be like:
1. Tomorrow comment period open (30 days)
2. OMB Review all comments and produce bunch or rules (30 days review)
3. Publish Propose Rules in Federal Register via regulatory process (In
March)
4. After OMB approval USCIS will open for comments period (30 Days)
5. USCIS will review all comments and produce final rule (30 Days)
6. OMB will review final rule ( 30 Days )
7. After OMB approval USCIS will publish Final rule on FR with effective
date ( 30 Days standard time for effective date after publish on FR)
Bingo - We have a July 2015 visa Bulletin where everyone is Current in EB
Category!!
Here is an optimistic projection,
If the POTUS wants it, the Timeline could also be like:
1. Tomorrow comment period open (30 days)
2. OMB Review all comments and produce bunch or rules (30 days review)
3. Publish Propose Rules in Federal Register via regulatory process (In
March)
4. After OMB approval USCIS will open for comments period (30 Days)
5. USCIS will review all comments and produce final rule (30 Days)
6. OMB will review final rule ( 30 Days )
7. After OMB approval USCIS will publish Final rule on FR with effective
date ( 30 Days standard time for effective date after publish on FR)
Bingo - We have a July 2015 visa Bulletin where everyone is Current in EB
Category!!
b*g
26 楼
原来需要这么久，过六个月再来看EA。
d*p
27 楼
全按PD，彻底消除国家限额，那么大家全部洗了睡，2年后再看visa bulletin吧
H*i
28 楼
我觉得可以建议奥本每月发布绿卡应发数量和实发数量，这样可以方便我们监督名额使
用情况，增加透明度，减少黑箱操作。
这个数据必须是按国别和按照category的，不一定要具体到蒙古、冰岛等小国，至少是
按照中印菲墨ROW五大国别EB12345等类别来统计数字的。
用情况，增加透明度，减少黑箱操作。
这个数据必须是按国别和按照category的，不一定要具体到蒙古、冰岛等小国，至少是
按照中印菲墨ROW五大国别EB12345等类别来统计数字的。
m*i
29 楼
这个应该不难实现，需要大家都提吗？
【在 H******i 的大作中提到】
: 我觉得可以建议奥本每月发布绿卡应发数量和实发数量，这样可以方便我们监督名额使
: 用情况，增加透明度，减少黑箱操作。
: 这个数据必须是按国别和按照category的，不一定要具体到蒙古、冰岛等小国，至少是
: 按照中印菲墨ROW五大国别EB12345等类别来统计数字的。
【在 H******i 的大作中提到】
: 我觉得可以建议奥本每月发布绿卡应发数量和实发数量，这样可以方便我们监督名额使
: 用情况，增加透明度，减少黑箱操作。
: 这个数据必须是按国别和按照category的，不一定要具体到蒙古、冰岛等小国，至少是
: 按照中印菲墨ROW五大国别EB12345等类别来统计数字的。
l*p
30 楼
所以最理想情况h4 ead还要4个月？
不如等放水了
year
standard
【在 p******i 的大作中提到】
: 老印的悲观估计：
: 1. Tomorrow comment period open (30 days)
: 2. Review all comments and produce bunch or rules (60 days review)
: 3. Propose Rules via regulatory process ( In April)
: 4. Will go through OMB Review process (90 Days standard time, it took 2 year
: for H4 EAD rules)
: 5. After OMB approval USCIS will open for comments period ( 60 Days standard
: )
: 6. USCIS will review all comments and produce final rule ( No time limit, H4
: EAD took 6 month and still in review)
不如等放水了
year
standard
【在 p******i 的大作中提到】
: 老印的悲观估计：
: 1. Tomorrow comment period open (30 days)
: 2. Review all comments and produce bunch or rules (60 days review)
: 3. Propose Rules via regulatory process ( In April)
: 4. Will go through OMB Review process (90 Days standard time, it took 2 year
: for H4 EAD rules)
: 5. After OMB approval USCIS will open for comments period ( 60 Days standard
: )
: 6. USCIS will review all comments and produce final rule ( No time limit, H4
: EAD took 6 month and still in review)
相关阅读
485的RD究竟是Received Date还是Notice Date?排期排到2011年4月，我发光所有包子。。。SRC 140 处理进度的分析报告 (2/29）Breaking news about 3012RFE 2周以后，老pd终于绿了 (NSC)Got REF today. Ask for the blessNSC, EAD/AP approved请问绿卡收到时,人在国内怎么办?EB2拿到485至少再呆半年么？三月交485的有受到receipt的吗？谢谢版主刚才主持公道，封了yuxuxin。坑爹啊，TSC 2/3 RD. 网站上还是找不到请教EB2初级问题485那一步申查报税？大家的AP/EAD卡是寄给律师的， 还是自己？有的人真的是什么都骂副申请人的结婚公证书要几分？ (转载)住在康洲的，485该寄往哪个处理中心有间隔两个星期收到两份fp的吗?一直不明白一个问题