Legal Immigration Modernization Report from White House# EB23 - 劳工卡
w*l
1 楼
d*l
2 楼
我尽然扫完了这48页。。。。。
w*l
3 楼
Page 29:
Later this year, State, in consolation with DHS, will revise the monthly
Visa Bulletin to better estimate immigrant visa availability for prospective
applicants, providing needed predictability to nonimmigrant workers seeking
permanent residency. The revisions will help ensure that the maximum number
of available visas is issue every year, while also MINIMIZING the potential
for visa retrogression.
Later this year, State, in consolation with DHS, will revise the monthly
Visa Bulletin to better estimate immigrant visa availability for prospective
applicants, providing needed predictability to nonimmigrant workers seeking
permanent residency. The revisions will help ensure that the maximum number
of available visas is issue every year, while also MINIMIZING the potential
for visa retrogression.
r*y
4 楼
这个是IV之前一直宣称要announce的吗？
c*3
5 楼
如果这个能通过倒是好事，以后可以容易换工作，待遇也不会被压榨的太狠
p*d
6 楼
Employment-based visa issuance
• Update monthly visa bulletin
• Refine monthly allocation of visas
• Improve numerically controlled immigrant visa appointments
• Clarify and expand protections for employment-based immigrants and
nonimmigrants
modernization
【在 w*l 的大作中提到】
: https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/docs/final_visa_modernization
: _report1.pdf
• Update monthly visa bulletin
• Refine monthly allocation of visas
• Improve numerically controlled immigrant visa appointments
• Clarify and expand protections for employment-based immigrants and
nonimmigrants
modernization
【在 w*l 的大作中提到】
: https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/docs/final_visa_modernization
: _report1.pdf
G*D
7 楼
有啥干货
m*i
8 楼
亮点是这条吗？
Further increase job flexibility by enabling individuals whose employment-
sponsored
immigrant visa petitions have been approved for more than one year to retain
eligibility
for LPR status despite the petitioning employer closing its business or
seeking to withdraw
the approved petition;
modernization
【在 w*l 的大作中提到】
: https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/docs/final_visa_modernization
: _report1.pdf
Further increase job flexibility by enabling individuals whose employment-
sponsored
immigrant visa petitions have been approved for more than one year to retain
eligibility
for LPR status despite the petitioning employer closing its business or
seeking to withdraw
the approved petition;
modernization
【在 w*l 的大作中提到】
: https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/docs/final_visa_modernization
: _report1.pdf
F*u
9 楼
那是不是放水也少了
prospective
seeking
number
potential
【在 w*l 的大作中提到】
: Page 29:
: Later this year, State, in consolation with DHS, will revise the monthly
: Visa Bulletin to better estimate immigrant visa availability for prospective
: applicants, providing needed predictability to nonimmigrant workers seeking
: permanent residency. The revisions will help ensure that the maximum number
: of available visas is issue every year, while also MINIMIZING the potential
: for visa retrogression.
prospective
seeking
number
potential
【在 w*l 的大作中提到】
: Page 29:
: Later this year, State, in consolation with DHS, will revise the monthly
: Visa Bulletin to better estimate immigrant visa availability for prospective
: applicants, providing needed predictability to nonimmigrant workers seeking
: permanent residency. The revisions will help ensure that the maximum number
: of available visas is issue every year, while also MINIMIZING the potential
: for visa retrogression.
c*3
10 楼
能平稳推进，大家都能预期拿卡时间，比偶尔防水、忽前忽后的靠谱多了
【在 F*********u 的大作中提到】
: 那是不是放水也少了
:
: prospective
: seeking
: number
: potential
【在 F*********u 的大作中提到】
: 那是不是放水也少了
:
: prospective
: seeking
: number
: potential
r*y
11 楼
感觉还比较模糊，好像没有很具体的条例？要多久能生效啊？
x*8
12 楼
和我们相关的要点：page 30
Recommendation 4: Clarify and expand protections for employment-based
immigrants and nonimmigrants. DHS intends to publish a regulation clarifying
and expanding on the protections afforded employment-based immigrants and
nonimmigrants under the American Competitiveness in the Twenty-First Century
Act of 2000 (“AC-21”), which was meant to increase job flexibility for
individuals who were coming to the United States to perform specialty
occupation services (H-1B) and those on the pathway to permanent residency.
This regulation will:
• Increase the ability of workers waiting for a green card to change
jobs or receive promotions by clarifying when individuals may change jobs or
employers because such employment is “same or similar” to the job that
was the original basis for permanent residency;
• Further increase job flexibility by enabling individuals whose
employment-sponsored immigrant visa petitions have been approved for more
than one year to retain eligibility for LPR status despite the petitioning
employer closing its business or seeking to withdraw the approved petition;
• Provide increased guidance on job flexibility provisions for H-1B
workers seeking other H-1B employment, including changing jobs or employers;
• Extend grace periods for certain nonimmigrant workers whose period
of authorized stay has expired, including because their jobs have been
terminated, to better allow them to obtain other employment without losing
their nonimmigrant status;
• Clarify when H-1B nonimmigrants may begin working without required
licensure;
• Provide increased guidance on the maximum period of admission for H-
1B nonimmigrants, including for those who are on the path to LPR status, and
enable H-1B nonimmigrants to recapture time spent outside of the United
States;
• Clarify which H-1B nonimmigrants are exempt from the statutory cap
to ensure that those nonimmigrants who are contributing to U.S. research and
the education of Americans may remain in the United States; and
• Protect H-1B nonimmigrants who suffered retaliatory actions because
they reported labor violations committed by their employer.
modernization
【在 w*l 的大作中提到】
: https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/docs/final_visa_modernization
: _report1.pdf
Recommendation 4: Clarify and expand protections for employment-based
immigrants and nonimmigrants. DHS intends to publish a regulation clarifying
and expanding on the protections afforded employment-based immigrants and
nonimmigrants under the American Competitiveness in the Twenty-First Century
Act of 2000 (“AC-21”), which was meant to increase job flexibility for
individuals who were coming to the United States to perform specialty
occupation services (H-1B) and those on the pathway to permanent residency.
This regulation will:
• Increase the ability of workers waiting for a green card to change
jobs or receive promotions by clarifying when individuals may change jobs or
employers because such employment is “same or similar” to the job that
was the original basis for permanent residency;
• Further increase job flexibility by enabling individuals whose
employment-sponsored immigrant visa petitions have been approved for more
than one year to retain eligibility for LPR status despite the petitioning
employer closing its business or seeking to withdraw the approved petition;
• Provide increased guidance on job flexibility provisions for H-1B
workers seeking other H-1B employment, including changing jobs or employers;
• Extend grace periods for certain nonimmigrant workers whose period
of authorized stay has expired, including because their jobs have been
terminated, to better allow them to obtain other employment without losing
their nonimmigrant status;
• Clarify when H-1B nonimmigrants may begin working without required
licensure;
• Provide increased guidance on the maximum period of admission for H-
1B nonimmigrants, including for those who are on the path to LPR status, and
enable H-1B nonimmigrants to recapture time spent outside of the United
States;
• Clarify which H-1B nonimmigrants are exempt from the statutory cap
to ensure that those nonimmigrants who are contributing to U.S. research and
the education of Americans may remain in the United States; and
• Protect H-1B nonimmigrants who suffered retaliatory actions because
they reported labor violations committed by their employer.
modernization
【在 w*l 的大作中提到】
: https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/docs/final_visa_modernization
: _report1.pdf
c*y
13 楼
以现在老中的perm数量，只要不少发，把所有该给老中的发全了，排期就很短了，不需
要放水了。
另外如果要更准确统计未来需求量，就必须提前放水，数清楚，这是唯一的办法
【在 F*********u 的大作中提到】
: 那是不是放水也少了
:
: prospective
: seeking
: number
: potential
要放水了。
另外如果要更准确统计未来需求量，就必须提前放水，数清楚，这是唯一的办法
【在 F*********u 的大作中提到】
: 那是不是放水也少了
:
: prospective
: seeking
: number
: potential
t*r
14 楼
AC21是针对485交了之后吧? 以下这条难不成讲的是140? 岂不是违反AC21? 求解读.
Further increase job flexibility by enabling individuals whose employment-
sponsored immigrant visa petitions have been approved for more than one year
to retain eligibility for LPR status despite the petitioning employer
closing its business or seeking to withdraw the approved petition;
Further increase job flexibility by enabling individuals whose employment-
sponsored immigrant visa petitions have been approved for more than one year
to retain eligibility for LPR status despite the petitioning employer
closing its business or seeking to withdraw the approved petition;
z*d
15 楼
个人总结的干货就是
1. VISA 数量可能会增加 反正排期尽可能的不倒退
2. 以后有一种类似EAD的东西但是似乎比EAD更方便，没有AP。
1. VISA 数量可能会增加 反正排期尽可能的不倒退
2. 以后有一种类似EAD的东西但是似乎比EAD更方便，没有AP。
x*8
16 楼
这个好像是说140 approve 一年之后给LPR status，然后就可以换工作了，雇主撤销也
没用，
LPR啥缩写？PR好像是 Permenant Resident? L是啥？
year
【在 t*******r 的大作中提到】
: AC21是针对485交了之后吧? 以下这条难不成讲的是140? 岂不是违反AC21? 求解读.
: Further increase job flexibility by enabling individuals whose employment-
: sponsored immigrant visa petitions have been approved for more than one year
: to retain eligibility for LPR status despite the petitioning employer
: closing its business or seeking to withdraw the approved petition;
没用，
LPR啥缩写？PR好像是 Permenant Resident? L是啥？
year
【在 t*******r 的大作中提到】
: AC21是针对485交了之后吧? 以下这条难不成讲的是140? 岂不是违反AC21? 求解读.
: Further increase job flexibility by enabling individuals whose employment-
: sponsored immigrant visa petitions have been approved for more than one year
: to retain eligibility for LPR status despite the petitioning employer
: closing its business or seeking to withdraw the approved petition;
g*n
17 楼
VISA数量不可能增加，已经很清楚的说了这个需要立法才能改。现在他们能做的只是避
免浪费名额，增加换工作的自由度。
【在 z****d 的大作中提到】
: 个人总结的干货就是
: 1. VISA 数量可能会增加 反正排期尽可能的不倒退
: 2. 以后有一种类似EAD的东西但是似乎比EAD更方便，没有AP。
免浪费名额，增加换工作的自由度。
【在 z****d 的大作中提到】
: 个人总结的干货就是
: 1. VISA 数量可能会增加 反正排期尽可能的不倒退
: 2. 以后有一种类似EAD的东西但是似乎比EAD更方便，没有AP。
o*c
18 楼
Lawful Permanent Resident (LPR)
【在 x**8 的大作中提到】
: 这个好像是说140 approve 一年之后给LPR status，然后就可以换工作了，雇主撤销也
: 没用，
: LPR啥缩写？PR好像是 Permenant Resident? L是啥？
:
: year
【在 x**8 的大作中提到】
: 这个好像是说140 approve 一年之后给LPR status，然后就可以换工作了，雇主撤销也
: 没用，
: LPR啥缩写？PR好像是 Permenant Resident? L是啥？
:
: year
t*r
19 楼
Lawful Permenant Residient.
【在 x**8 的大作中提到】
: 这个好像是说140 approve 一年之后给LPR status，然后就可以换工作了，雇主撤销也
: 没用，
: LPR啥缩写？PR好像是 Permenant Resident? L是啥？
:
: year
【在 x**8 的大作中提到】
: 这个好像是说140 approve 一年之后给LPR status，然后就可以换工作了，雇主撤销也
: 没用，
: LPR啥缩写？PR好像是 Permenant Resident? L是啥？
:
: year
z*d
20 楼
L是合法的意思吧
【在 x**8 的大作中提到】
: 这个好像是说140 approve 一年之后给LPR status，然后就可以换工作了，雇主撤销也
: 没用，
: LPR啥缩写？PR好像是 Permenant Resident? L是啥？
:
: year
【在 x**8 的大作中提到】
: 这个好像是说140 approve 一年之后给LPR status，然后就可以换工作了，雇主撤销也
: 没用，
: LPR啥缩写？PR好像是 Permenant Resident? L是啥？
:
: year
z*y
21 楼
Legal?
【在 x**8 的大作中提到】
: 这个好像是说140 approve 一年之后给LPR status，然后就可以换工作了，雇主撤销也
: 没用，
: LPR啥缩写？PR好像是 Permenant Resident? L是啥？
:
: year
【在 x**8 的大作中提到】
: 这个好像是说140 approve 一年之后给LPR status，然后就可以换工作了，雇主撤销也
: 没用，
: LPR啥缩写？PR好像是 Permenant Resident? L是啥？
:
: year
X*J
22 楼
没有看到140 EAD ,很伤心！！！
下文一年指的是perm 批了一年还是149 批了一年啊？
• Further increase job flexibility by enabling individuals whose
employment-sponsored immigrant visa petitions have been approved for more
than one year to retain eligibility for LPR status despite the petitioning
employer closing its business or seeking to withdraw the approved petition;
下文一年指的是perm 批了一年还是149 批了一年啊？
• Further increase job flexibility by enabling individuals whose
employment-sponsored immigrant visa petitions have been approved for more
than one year to retain eligibility for LPR status despite the petitioning
employer closing its business or seeking to withdraw the approved petition;
x*8
23 楼
好像主要是以下几点：
1. 140一年之后给就永久生效，不怕雇主撤销，
2. H1-B 给Grace period,而不是丢工作马上就out of status
3. 增加h1-b的最长期限，？？这个不懂啥意思
总之就是换工作会容易，具体不是很懂到底要说啥，好几个bullet point都说job
flexibility，但是不知道彼此有啥不同，
clarifying
Century
.
【在 x**8 的大作中提到】
: 和我们相关的要点：page 30
: Recommendation 4: Clarify and expand protections for employment-based
: immigrants and nonimmigrants. DHS intends to publish a regulation clarifying
: and expanding on the protections afforded employment-based immigrants and
: nonimmigrants under the American Competitiveness in the Twenty-First Century
: Act of 2000 (“AC-21”), which was meant to increase job flexibility for
: individuals who were coming to the United States to perform specialty
: occupation services (H-1B) and those on the pathway to permanent residency.
: This regulation will:
: • Increase the ability of workers waiting for a green card to change
1. 140一年之后给就永久生效，不怕雇主撤销，
2. H1-B 给Grace period,而不是丢工作马上就out of status
3. 增加h1-b的最长期限，？？这个不懂啥意思
总之就是换工作会容易，具体不是很懂到底要说啥，好几个bullet point都说job
flexibility，但是不知道彼此有啥不同，
clarifying
Century
.
【在 x**8 的大作中提到】
: 和我们相关的要点：page 30
: Recommendation 4: Clarify and expand protections for employment-based
: immigrants and nonimmigrants. DHS intends to publish a regulation clarifying
: and expanding on the protections afforded employment-based immigrants and
: nonimmigrants under the American Competitiveness in the Twenty-First Century
: Act of 2000 (“AC-21”), which was meant to increase job flexibility for
: individuals who were coming to the United States to perform specialty
: occupation services (H-1B) and those on the pathway to permanent residency.
: This regulation will:
: • Increase the ability of workers waiting for a green card to change
o*0
24 楼
O8对待合法的态度比较认真，这是很好很好滴！
X*J
25 楼
140 approved 的date是140上面的receive date 吗？ 还是notice date
dhs不是说10月份把140 EAD放在议题上面吗？ 居然白皮书里面没有写timeline.
5555
【在 z******y 的大作中提到】
: Legal?
dhs不是说10月份把140 EAD放在议题上面吗？ 居然白皮书里面没有写timeline.
5555
【在 z******y 的大作中提到】
: Legal?
z*d
26 楼
这只是recommendation而已，细则还不知道什么时候出呢。他们用增加H1B的工作自由
度去替代了140 EAD，这样可能让他们的工作更简化。
度去替代了140 EAD，这样可能让他们的工作更简化。
p*i
27 楼
那什么时候生效？
x*8
28 楼
LPR status以前提过么？
我是第一次见到，
如果L表示Lawful/Legal的话，那这个LPR跟绿卡差别好像也不大了吧？
【在 z****d 的大作中提到】
: 这只是recommendation而已，细则还不知道什么时候出呢。他们用增加H1B的工作自由
: 度去替代了140 EAD，这样可能让他们的工作更简化。
我是第一次见到，
如果L表示Lawful/Legal的话，那这个LPR跟绿卡差别好像也不大了吧？
【在 z****d 的大作中提到】
: 这只是recommendation而已，细则还不知道什么时候出呢。他们用增加H1B的工作自由
: 度去替代了140 EAD，这样可能让他们的工作更简化。
o*0
29 楼
前段时间不是说8月出台走程序明年初实施吗？
X*J
30 楼
不知道非法那块怎么样，至少没有忘记合法那块，值得顶。
h4 EAD 放在achievement第一条，快点通过h1b EAD 那块 ,Value 无限扩大。
【在 o********0 的大作中提到】
: O8对待合法的态度比较认真，这是很好很好滴！
h4 EAD 放在achievement第一条，快点通过h1b EAD 那块 ,Value 无限扩大。
【在 o********0 的大作中提到】
: O8对待合法的态度比较认真，这是很好很好滴！
x*8
31 楼
嗯，看来是Lawful或者是Legal，都靠谱，
【在 z******y 的大作中提到】
: Legal?
【在 z******y 的大作中提到】
: Legal?
w*i
32 楼
空谈误国，赶紧实施。先叫奥本学习下，赶紧放vb,不要顶风退排期！
z*d
33 楼
“retain eligibility for LPR status”，并不是说你立刻就拥有了LPR的状态了。
【在 x**8 的大作中提到】
: LPR status以前提过么？
: 我是第一次见到，
: 如果L表示Lawful/Legal的话，那这个LPR跟绿卡差别好像也不大了吧？
【在 x**8 的大作中提到】
: LPR status以前提过么？
: 我是第一次见到，
: 如果L表示Lawful/Legal的话，那这个LPR跟绿卡差别好像也不大了吧？
x*8
34 楼
http://www.uscis.gov/tools/glossary/lawful-permanent-resident-l
Any person not a citizen of the United States who is residing the in the U.S
. under legally recognized and lawfully recorded permanent residence as an
immigrant. Also known as "Permanent Resident Alien," "Resident Alien Permit
Holder," and "Green Card Holder."
这个如果140一年之后就lawful Permanent Resident, 有点儿too good to be true吧？
【在 o****c 的大作中提到】
: Lawful Permanent Resident (LPR)
Any person not a citizen of the United States who is residing the in the U.S
. under legally recognized and lawfully recorded permanent residence as an
immigrant. Also known as "Permanent Resident Alien," "Resident Alien Permit
Holder," and "Green Card Holder."
这个如果140一年之后就lawful Permanent Resident, 有点儿too good to be true吧？
【在 o****c 的大作中提到】
: Lawful Permanent Resident (LPR)
D*u
35 楼
LPR 应该就是Green Card， 只是说拿到140一年后不会因为换工作的原因失去拿绿卡的
资格，"to retain eligibility for LPR status"。
资格，"to retain eligibility for LPR status"。
z*d
36 楼
哈哈，其实就是中央的指示精神已经下了，就看地方的执行力度了
【在 w********i 的大作中提到】
: 空谈误国，赶紧实施。先叫奥本学习下，赶紧放vb,不要顶风退排期！
【在 w********i 的大作中提到】
: 空谈误国，赶紧实施。先叫奥本学习下，赶紧放vb,不要顶风退排期！
x*8
37 楼
是的，我老读差了，
【在 z****d 的大作中提到】
: “retain eligibility for LPR status”，并不是说你立刻就拥有了LPR的状态了。
【在 z****d 的大作中提到】
: “retain eligibility for LPR status”，并不是说你立刻就拥有了LPR的状态了。
x*8
38 楼
哦，我理解还是对的，就是140一年后可以随便换工作的意思，雇主撤销140也不怕了，
【在 D**u 的大作中提到】
: LPR 应该就是Green Card， 只是说拿到140一年后不会因为换工作的原因失去拿绿卡的
: 资格，"to retain eligibility for LPR status"。
【在 D**u 的大作中提到】
: LPR 应该就是Green Card， 只是说拿到140一年后不会因为换工作的原因失去拿绿卡的
: 资格，"to retain eligibility for LPR status"。
x*8
39 楼
应该是140一年后，换工作不用重走perm，排期等着，到了就交485，
嗯，
【在 x**8 的大作中提到】
: 哦，我理解还是对的，就是140一年后可以随便换工作的意思，雇主撤销140也不怕了，
嗯，
【在 x**8 的大作中提到】
: 哦，我理解还是对的，就是140一年后可以随便换工作的意思，雇主撤销140也不怕了，
B*n
40 楼
lawful
【在 x**8 的大作中提到】
: 这个好像是说140 approve 一年之后给LPR status，然后就可以换工作了，雇主撤销也
: 没用，
: LPR啥缩写？PR好像是 Permenant Resident? L是啥？
:
: year
【在 x**8 的大作中提到】
: 这个好像是说140 approve 一年之后给LPR status，然后就可以换工作了，雇主撤销也
: 没用，
: LPR啥缩写？PR好像是 Permenant Resident? L是啥？
:
: year
B*n
41 楼
提到过
H4 EAD当时就用了LPR pending配偶blabla的说法
【在 x**8 的大作中提到】
: LPR status以前提过么？
: 我是第一次见到，
: 如果L表示Lawful/Legal的话，那这个LPR跟绿卡差别好像也不大了吧？
H4 EAD当时就用了LPR pending配偶blabla的说法
【在 x**8 的大作中提到】
: LPR status以前提过么？
: 我是第一次见到，
: 如果L表示Lawful/Legal的话，那这个LPR跟绿卡差别好像也不大了吧？
x*8
42 楼
看起来是好事情，就看什么时候生效了，
【在 B********n 的大作中提到】
: lawful
【在 B********n 的大作中提到】
: lawful
t*r
43 楼
不敢相信阿...too good to be true.
【在 x**8 的大作中提到】
: 应该是140一年后，换工作不用重走perm，排期等着，到了就交485，
: 嗯，
【在 x**8 的大作中提到】
: 应该是140一年后，换工作不用重走perm，排期等着，到了就交485，
: 嗯，
B*n
44 楼
不用不相信
上一次，3月的时候不是有个电话会议么
当时一堆三哥就打电话进去说了
140希望可以不撤销，如果觉得要等，既然485 approve后半年可以换工作
140就应该也可以6个月or1年可以换工作
话说，明天也有个会议，大家到时候可以打进去听听
【在 t*******r 的大作中提到】
: 不敢相信阿...too good to be true.
上一次，3月的时候不是有个电话会议么
当时一堆三哥就打电话进去说了
140希望可以不撤销，如果觉得要等，既然485 approve后半年可以换工作
140就应该也可以6个月or1年可以换工作
话说，明天也有个会议，大家到时候可以打进去听听
【在 t*******r 的大作中提到】
: 不敢相信阿...too good to be true.
t*n
45 楼
哈哈
【在 w********i 的大作中提到】
: 空谈误国，赶紧实施。先叫奥本学习下，赶紧放vb,不要顶风退排期！
【在 w********i 的大作中提到】
: 空谈误国，赶紧实施。先叫奥本学习下，赶紧放vb,不要顶风退排期！
l*0
46 楼
仁兄， 140那个什么时候实施呀？
【在 B********n 的大作中提到】
: 不用不相信
: 上一次，3月的时候不是有个电话会议么
: 当时一堆三哥就打电话进去说了
: 140希望可以不撤销，如果觉得要等，既然485 approve后半年可以换工作
: 140就应该也可以6个月or1年可以换工作
: 话说，明天也有个会议，大家到时候可以打进去听听
【在 B********n 的大作中提到】
: 不用不相信
: 上一次，3月的时候不是有个电话会议么
: 当时一堆三哥就打电话进去说了
: 140希望可以不撤销，如果觉得要等，既然485 approve后半年可以换工作
: 140就应该也可以6个月or1年可以换工作
: 话说，明天也有个会议，大家到时候可以打进去听听
B*n
47 楼
第一我不是男人，也不打算T
第二看report，里面没具体日期所以我也不知道
【在 l*********0 的大作中提到】
: 仁兄， 140那个什么时候实施呀？
第二看report，里面没具体日期所以我也不知道
【在 l*********0 的大作中提到】
: 仁兄， 140那个什么时候实施呀？
a*g
48 楼
上面写的都是recommandation， 意思就是还没通过吗？
【在 B********n 的大作中提到】
: 第一我不是男人，也不打算T
: 第二看report，里面没具体日期所以我也不知道
【在 B********n 的大作中提到】
: 第一我不是男人，也不打算T
: 第二看report，里面没具体日期所以我也不知道
B*n
49 楼
对，但是这些都是他们可以做的，能绕开两会不需要他们投票的，上了奥巴马桌子签字
就能过的
【在 a*********g 的大作中提到】
: 上面写的都是recommandation， 意思就是还没通过吗？
就能过的
【在 a*********g 的大作中提到】
: 上面写的都是recommandation， 意思就是还没通过吗？
x*8
50 楼
这个算是rule making process吧？
【在 a*********g 的大作中提到】
: 上面写的都是recommandation， 意思就是还没通过吗？
【在 a*********g 的大作中提到】
: 上面写的都是recommandation， 意思就是还没通过吗？
a*g
51 楼
下面就看O8的啦
【在 B********n 的大作中提到】
: 对，但是这些都是他们可以做的，能绕开两会不需要他们投票的，上了奥巴马桌子签字
: 就能过的
【在 B********n 的大作中提到】
: 对，但是这些都是他们可以做的，能绕开两会不需要他们投票的，上了奥巴马桌子签字
: 就能过的
h*y
52 楼
140是移民petition，485是adjustment of status
140批了一年后，就算丢或换工作还继续保持eligibility for lpr status 排期到了可
以直接aos
不知道这么理解对不对
不过按照目前的速度 加上尽量排期不倒退的精神 140批了一年之后eb23c差不多也能交
485了 这东西看来还是只对烙印帮助大
140批了一年后，就算丢或换工作还继续保持eligibility for lpr status 排期到了可
以直接aos
不知道这么理解对不对
不过按照目前的速度 加上尽量排期不倒退的精神 140批了一年之后eb23c差不多也能交
485了 这东西看来还是只对烙印帮助大
c*3
53 楼
EB23交不了吧，目前EB3最少排期都在4年以上，能有个缓冲，不重办PERM还是好的，至
少一年后就自由了
【在 h*y 的大作中提到】
: 140是移民petition，485是adjustment of status
: 140批了一年后，就算丢或换工作还继续保持eligibility for lpr status 排期到了可
: 以直接aos
: 不知道这么理解对不对
: 不过按照目前的速度 加上尽量排期不倒退的精神 140批了一年之后eb23c差不多也能交
: 485了 这东西看来还是只对烙印帮助大
少一年后就自由了
【在 h*y 的大作中提到】
: 140是移民petition，485是adjustment of status
: 140批了一年后，就算丢或换工作还继续保持eligibility for lpr status 排期到了可
: 以直接aos
: 不知道这么理解对不对
: 不过按照目前的速度 加上尽量排期不倒退的精神 140批了一年之后eb23c差不多也能交
: 485了 这东西看来还是只对烙印帮助大
a*g
54 楼
目前看140批了后早的也是2年左右交485的，所以1年后永久有效还是有意思的
【在 h*y 的大作中提到】
: 140是移民petition，485是adjustment of status
: 140批了一年后，就算丢或换工作还继续保持eligibility for lpr status 排期到了可
: 以直接aos
: 不知道这么理解对不对
: 不过按照目前的速度 加上尽量排期不倒退的精神 140批了一年之后eb23c差不多也能交
: 485了 这东西看来还是只对烙印帮助大
【在 h*y 的大作中提到】
: 140是移民petition，485是adjustment of status
: 140批了一年后，就算丢或换工作还继续保持eligibility for lpr status 排期到了可
: 以直接aos
: 不知道这么理解对不对
: 不过按照目前的速度 加上尽量排期不倒退的精神 140批了一年之后eb23c差不多也能交
: 485了 这东西看来还是只对烙印帮助大
B*n
55 楼
140通过approve后1年是告诉大家
坚决要求用PP，不行就自己出PP钱
【在 a*********g 的大作中提到】
: 目前看140批了后早的也是2年左右交485的，所以1年后永久有效还是有意思的
坚决要求用PP，不行就自己出PP钱
【在 a*********g 的大作中提到】
: 目前看140批了后早的也是2年左右交485的，所以1年后永久有效还是有意思的
h*y
56 楼
现在eb2排期是1年半多一点，去年大批降级的时候eb3也是一年半
【在 c******3 的大作中提到】
: EB23交不了吧，目前EB3最少排期都在4年以上，能有个缓冲，不重办PERM还是好的，至
: 少一年后就自由了
【在 c******3 的大作中提到】
: EB23交不了吧，目前EB3最少排期都在4年以上，能有个缓冲，不重办PERM还是好的，至
: 少一年后就自由了
l*t
57 楼
唉，没有140 ead
B*n
58 楼
2011 2012还有很多没绿的好么。。
【在 h*y 的大作中提到】
: 现在eb2排期是1年半多一点，去年大批降级的时候eb3也是一年半
【在 h*y 的大作中提到】
: 现在eb2排期是1年半多一点，去年大批降级的时候eb3也是一年半
F*r
59 楼
O8连DACA和DAPA都敢过了。
这些针对合法移民还外加那么多限制的政策对他来说算个屁，随便过。
【在 a*********g 的大作中提到】
: 下面就看O8的啦
这些针对合法移民还外加那么多限制的政策对他来说算个屁，随便过。
【在 a*********g 的大作中提到】
: 下面就看O8的啦
v*a
60 楼
观海同志什么时候签?
【在 B********n 的大作中提到】
: 对，但是这些都是他们可以做的，能绕开两会不需要他们投票的，上了奥巴马桌子签字
: 就能过的
【在 B********n 的大作中提到】
: 对，但是这些都是他们可以做的，能绕开两会不需要他们投票的，上了奥巴马桌子签字
: 就能过的
b*e
61 楼
那140以后1年可以辞职回国，然后就等PD到了交485？这理解对吗？
那倒是挺不错的，可以回国探索一下国内机会，不爽还可以交485的时候回来。
那倒是挺不错的，可以回国探索一下国内机会，不爽还可以交485的时候回来。
j*g
62 楼
这个应该不行吧，至少交485的时候得有工作，可能还会要求类似的工作。
【在 b****e 的大作中提到】
: 那140以后1年可以辞职回国，然后就等PD到了交485？这理解对吗？
: 那倒是挺不错的，可以回国探索一下国内机会，不爽还可以交485的时候回来。
【在 b****e 的大作中提到】
: 那140以后1年可以辞职回国，然后就等PD到了交485？这理解对吗？
: 那倒是挺不错的，可以回国探索一下国内机会，不爽还可以交485的时候回来。
h*y
63 楼
这是现在的龟腚 以后不一定了
不过我觉得回国了再回来交485不太靠谱
【在 j******g 的大作中提到】
: 这个应该不行吧，至少交485的时候得有工作，可能还会要求类似的工作。
不过我觉得回国了再回来交485不太靠谱
【在 j******g 的大作中提到】
: 这个应该不行吧，至少交485的时候得有工作，可能还会要求类似的工作。
h*y
64 楼
但都已经交了485不是吗？
交了485，今天宣布的东西也就没太大意义了
【在 B********n 的大作中提到】
: 2011 2012还有很多没绿的好么。。
交了485，今天宣布的东西也就没太大意义了
【在 B********n 的大作中提到】
: 2011 2012还有很多没绿的好么。。
W*o
65 楼
这个EB2C一年半的排期太乐观了，也就是说2014年12月的PD可以在2016年7月这个时候
current 吗？
【在 h*y 的大作中提到】
: 现在eb2排期是1年半多一点，去年大批降级的时候eb3也是一年半
current 吗？
【在 h*y 的大作中提到】
: 现在eb2排期是1年半多一点，去年大批降级的时候eb3也是一年半
F*u
66 楼
运气好的1年半 差的3年半
不过总体趋势是在缩短
【在 W***o 的大作中提到】
: 这个EB2C一年半的排期太乐观了，也就是说2014年12月的PD可以在2016年7月这个时候
: current 吗？
不过总体趋势是在缩短
【在 W***o 的大作中提到】
: 这个EB2C一年半的排期太乐观了，也就是说2014年12月的PD可以在2016年7月这个时候
: current 吗？
X*J
67 楼
Hope this interpretation from immigration voice is reliable
JULY 15, 2015 UPDATE & CLARIFICATIONS. PLEASE LIKE AND SHARE THIS SO THAT
ALL CONFUSION CAN BE CLEAR ABOUT THE REPORT ON THE FORUMS.
Please continue to visit immigration voice.org and immigration voice
Facebook page to more information and action items in the days to come.
Question: IV asked us to have "Papers Ready". If this is just a report I don
't understand why you asked us to have papers ready.
IMMIGRATION VOICE Answer: We have said this before, but some folks keep
asking the same question again.
The original plan was to make VB current for the month of July. That is why
we provides heads up to folks to get papers ready.
Subsequently, because of the EAD for H4 lawsuit, Administration was
concerned about a possible lawsuit for making Vb current. dropped the plan
for making VB current. So there was change of plan.
In retrospect we did the right thing for sharing what was going on then. If
you got papers ready, that will not hurt anyone, you will need them at some
point. Many folks will soon be able to use the documents in October.
======
Question: The report looks like a joke! No EAD for approved 140, no
recapture..?
IMMIGRATION VOICE Answer: Recapture?? Did anyone ever said that there will
be recapture in this report?
====
Question: Although most points were already shared by IV, it's good that it'
s on official paper. Cheers!
2) It also appears that the employee will be free after 1 year of I-140
approval, which contradicts with what we asked for (no wait time). Please
confirm.
IS there a way the community/we can help speed up the rule making?
IMMIGRATION VOICE Answer: Yes, we asked for it. But some idiots kept on "
tweeting" that they wanted to wait 1 year "ONLY". We kept on asking not to
tweet the wrong message, but some people just don't learn, don't they?
=====
Question: Why this report doesn't contain EAD for I-140?
IMMIGRATION VOICE Answer: This report is about new fixes. The goal is to
make public the new fixes that the Administration plans to implement. Again,
these are "NEW" fixes, in addition to the existing fixes were announced
earlier, including EAD for I-140.
Why this report is important?
Every one is so focused on EAD for I-140. But what good is EAD for I140 if
you cannot change employers or jobs. Or if your employer revokes your I140,
invalidating your I140, and thus EAD. What is the point of having an EAD,
but having to start your green card process all over again if you change
your employer or jobs. And what jobs can one change into using EAD for I140.
This report is an announcement for the fixes that will provide all these
answers.
1.) Your employer will be unable to revoke your approved I140 after 1 year.
2.) You can change employer using EAD without having to start your green
card process all over again.
3.) Using EAD for I140, you will now be able to change jobs as defined by
Same or Similar
In essence, the fixes announced in this report are nuanced, but they will
allow you to live with freedoms while on EAD, these freedoms you will
otherwise get after getting green card.
Without these fixes, you are throw your EAD for I140 in the dustbin. That is
the relevance of this report. Most people waiting in green cards is unable
to complete understand the relevance of this report yet. But in time they
will understand the relevance. That is why these are very very important
fixes. EVERYONE in backlogs will be affected by this report.
Because of Visa Modernization, VB dates are expected to move significantly.
That will allow a lot more folks to file for AOS. So if you have prepared
your documents, then that is good because a lot of folks are expected to be
able to to use them starting October.
Hope this clarifies the significance.
====
Question: It seems the purpose of today's report publication was more for
rationalization of executive action. It doesn't do anything more than to
provide justification for rules changes and relief being proposed by the
administration. The target audience are the skeptics who are against any
immigration changes.
I am guessing major movements towards actual implementation would be around
the elections next year. Same goes for HR 213 which is waiting for the 2016
elections so the parties can influence voters.
But on the positive side, this is good for building momentum and there is
nothing negative to suggest administration is going back on anything
promised.
IMMIGRATION VOICE Answer: Lets put things in perspective and weigh things
accordingly. This has nothing to do with the election or election outcome.
We don't expect anyone to will win or lose elections because pending green
card petition applicants will be able to change jobs, or, because H.R.213
will pass. So this has nothing to do with election. Amplifying or over-
blowing this is not helpful. But it is also important to see things in the
right prespective because this report makes nuanced but significant changes
to the system on the group allowing job mobility to people.
=====
Question: Lastly and more worrisome: Right now, a worker's priority date is
his/her to keep the minute after I-140 approval. Is the intent of the point
in the report that it will now only be available 1 year after I-140 approval?
IMMIGRATION VOICE Answer: No, it means that after 1 year, you will not have
to restart your green card process even if you change employer. You will be
able to change employer and still continue with the same green card petition
. And yes, you will still retain your priority date.
===
Question: Repeating my question from before . Actually, I'm really bothered
that there's nothing in this report that hints about job mobility and
improved handling of job changes, nothing that ties back to the proposed
rule making by DSH (EAD + AP after I-140).
IMMIGRATION VOICE Answer: To the contrary, all the fixes in the report are
designed to create an environment of job mobility for applicants with
approved I-140. All these fixes are necessary in order to allow job mobility
using EAD after I140.
The purpose of all these changes is to provide job mobility to applicants
with approved I-140. You can even work for the current employer on EAD
immediately after the approval of I-140. Infact, you will be able to change
jobs using EAD from I-140, but your employer will have the ability to revoke
your I-140 until 1 year. This means. if you have an understanding with the
petitioning employer that they will not withdraw your I-140, then, after the
implementation of these fixes, you will be able to change employer or jobs
immediately after I-140 approval on EAD.
===
Question: How will these fixes help me. When will I get my Green Card”
IMMIGRATION VOICE Answer: Most people probably dont understand the meaning
of these fixes. That is why it doesnt sound appealing.
EAD for I140 is useless if you cant change job, or get promotion, or if your
employer withdraws I140. These fixes make your EAD for I140 meaningful.
Without these fixes, you can pretty much throw your EAD in the dustbin. With
these fixes, you will be able to live on EAD nearly close to how you live
with a green card. Hope this make sense and clarifies the reason for these
fixes.
We understand that most immigrants are simple minded folks. Most of us think
that if we have EAD, then that is good enough. But what if employer
withdraws your 140, invalidating your EAD. What good is EAD if you cannot
change employer without having to start your green card all over again. What
good is EAD if you cannot use it to change job or employer, or take a
promotion.
And this report ensures you have those rights that one otherwise would get
with green card. There is no law that says you will get these freedoms with
Green cards only. And theae fixes will ensure you are mostly free. Hope this
explains why there is a gift of freedom in the box, but you are unable to
see it.
======
Question: I do not know whether I should say "Good job IV"...I can't
convince myself as to what in the world is called a "technical glitch" (back
in May) when it is a simple report release....it is not as if all the
things mentioned in the report are already implemented....
Are we saying that there is a technical glitch in White House to upload a
simple report and that took 2.5 months to fix?
IMMIGRATION VOICE Answer: Why dont you call the WH and ask yourself? We are
only telling the truth as we are told. And with that, we have no incentive
to convice you or anyone else with the cause for the delay. It may seem
simple to you, maybe you dont understand the complexity of the process or
the change, who knows, but please do let us know the nature of technical
glitch when you get that from WH.
Look, at the end of the day, WH or DHS or USCIS owes you nothing, nada, zero
. You might as well rot in hell, and no body is responsible for you. The
fact that someone listened and did something that will help improve the
condition of your life, even if you cant see it now, in time you will. Srini
Tata, there is nothing wrong in showing some appreciation once in while,
specifically when someone does something for you. Funny how things work,
because you are worried about 2.5 months delay (in the past) without caring
much about how these fixes will effect your next 10 years.
And if you think you paying taxes entitles you for anything then why are you
looking for answers here? Did you pay taxes to us?
===
Question: how long would it take to implement these fixes.. 1 / 2 / 3../ n
years ?
IMMIGRATION VOICE Answer: You dont trust the government, you want timeline,
you dont like the fixes, they are not enough!
Is there something else? If you dont want to step up and do your share,
other than posting when something comes out, then how do you expect to have
any influence over the changes? Try to make your own commitment, and not ask
others for things for which you havent worked for.
As for the timeline - some fixes will be done through Memo, and could be
implemented in 2-3 months, some will need to go through regulatory process,
it could take up to an year’
=====
Question: Any update on "Pre-register" after 1-140 ? Is that completely DEAD?
IMMIGRATION VOICE Answer: Please STOP calling it preregister and EAD For
I140. You and others dont know, but using these terms abd repeatedly asking
the same question over and over again has severely affect your chance of
filing AOS
These are new fixes, in addition to EAD for I140. EAD for I140 is no good
without these fixes.
===
JULY 15, 2015 UPDATE & CLARIFICATIONS. PLEASE LIKE AND SHARE THIS SO THAT
ALL CONFUSION CAN BE CLEAR ABOUT THE REPORT ON THE FORUMS.
Please continue to visit immigration voice.org and immigration voice
Facebook page to more information and action items in the days to come.
Question: IV asked us to have "Papers Ready". If this is just a report I don
't understand why you asked us to have papers ready.
IMMIGRATION VOICE Answer: We have said this before, but some folks keep
asking the same question again.
The original plan was to make VB current for the month of July. That is why
we provides heads up to folks to get papers ready.
Subsequently, because of the EAD for H4 lawsuit, Administration was
concerned about a possible lawsuit for making Vb current. dropped the plan
for making VB current. So there was change of plan.
In retrospect we did the right thing for sharing what was going on then. If
you got papers ready, that will not hurt anyone, you will need them at some
point. Many folks will soon be able to use the documents in October.
======
Question: The report looks like a joke! No EAD for approved 140, no
recapture..?
IMMIGRATION VOICE Answer: Recapture?? Did anyone ever said that there will
be recapture in this report?
====
Question: Although most points were already shared by IV, it's good that it'
s on official paper. Cheers!
2) It also appears that the employee will be free after 1 year of I-140
approval, which contradicts with what we asked for (no wait time). Please
confirm.
IS there a way the community/we can help speed up the rule making?
IMMIGRATION VOICE Answer: Yes, we asked for it. But some idiots kept on "
tweeting" that they wanted to wait 1 year "ONLY". We kept on asking not to
tweet the wrong message, but some people just don't learn, don't they?
=====
Question: Why this report doesn't contain EAD for I-140?
IMMIGRATION VOICE Answer: This report is about new fixes. The goal is to
make public the new fixes that the Administration plans to implement. Again,
these are "NEW" fixes, in addition to the existing fixes were announced
earlier, including EAD for I-140.
Why this report is important?
Every one is so focused on EAD for I-140. But what good is EAD for I140 if
you cannot change employers or jobs. Or if your employer revokes your I140,
invalidating your I140, and thus EAD. What is the point of having an EAD,
but having to start your green card process all over again if you change
your employer or jobs. And what jobs can one change into using EAD for I140.
This report is an announcement for the fixes that will provide all these
answers.
1.) Your employer will be unable to revoke your approved I140 after 1 year.
2.) You can change employer using EAD without having to start your green
card process all over again.
3.) Using EAD for I140, you will now be able to change jobs as defined by
Same or Similar
In essence, the fixes announced in this report are nuanced, but they will
allow you to live with freedoms while on EAD, these freedoms you will
otherwise get after getting green card.
Without these fixes, you are throw your EAD for I140 in the dustbin. That is
the relevance of this report. Most people waiting in green cards is unable
to complete understand the relevance of this report yet. But in time they
will understand the relevance. That is why these are very very important
fixes. EVERYONE in backlogs will be affected by this report.
Because of Visa Modernization, VB dates are expected to move significantly.
That will allow a lot more folks to file for AOS. So if you have prepared
your documents, then that is good because a lot of folks are expected to be
able to to use them starting October.
Hope this clarifies the significance.
====
Question: It seems the purpose of today's report publication was more for
rationalization of executive action. It doesn't do anything more than to
provide justification for rules changes and relief being proposed by the
administration. The target audience are the skeptics who are against any
immigration changes.
I am guessing major movements towards actual implementation would be around
the elections next year. Same goes for HR 213 which is waiting for the 2016
elections so the parties can influence voters.
But on the positive side, this is good for building momentum and there is
nothing negative to suggest administration is going back on anything
promised.
IMMIGRATION VOICE Answer: Lets put things in perspective and weigh things
accordingly. This has nothing to do with the election or election outcome.
We don't expect anyone to will win or lose elections because pending green
card petition applicants will be able to change jobs, or, because H.R.213
will pass. So this has nothing to do with election. Amplifying or over-
blowing this is not helpful. But it is also important to see things in the
right prespective because this report makes nuanced but significant changes
to the system on the group allowing job mobility to people.
=====
Question: Lastly and more worrisome: Right now, a worker's priority date is
his/her to keep the minute after I-140 approval. Is the intent of the point
in the report that it will now only be available 1 year after I-140 approval?
IMMIGRATION VOICE Answer: No, it means that after 1 year, you will not have
to restart your green card process even if you change employer. You will be
able to change employer and still continue with the same green card petition
. And yes, you will still retain your priority date.
===
Question: Repeating my question from before . Actually, I'm really bothered
that there's nothing in this report that hints about job mobility and
improved handling of job changes, nothing that ties back to the proposed
rule making by DSH (EAD + AP after I-140).
IMMIGRATION VOICE Answer: To the contrary, all the fixes in the report are
designed to create an environment of job mobility for applicants with
approved I-140. All these fixes are necessary in order to allow job mobility
using EAD after I140.
The purpose of all these changes is to provide job mobility to applicants
with approved I-140. You can even work for the current employer on EAD
immediately after the approval of I-140. Infact, you will be able to change
jobs using EAD from I-140, but your employer will have the ability to revoke
your I-140 until 1 year. This means. if you have an understanding with the
petitioning employer that they will not withdraw your I-140, then, after the
implementation of these fixes, you will be able to change employer or jobs
immediately after I-140 approval on EAD.
===
Question: How will these fixes help me. When will I get my Green Card”
IMMIGRATION VOICE Answer: Most people probably dont understand the meaning
of these fixes. That is why it doesnt sound appealing.
EAD for I140 is useless if you cant change job, or get promotion, or if your
employer withdraws I140. These fixes make your EAD for I140 meaningful.
Without these fixes, you can pretty much throw your EAD in the dustbin. With
these fixes, you will be able to live on EAD nearly close to how you live
with a green card. Hope this make sense and clarifies the reason for these
fixes.
We understand that most immigrants are simple minded folks. Most of us think
that if we have EAD, then that is good enough. But what if employer
withdraws your 140, invalidating your EAD. What good is EAD if you cannot
change employer without having to start your green card all over again. What
good is EAD if you cannot use it to change job or employer, or take a
promotion.
And this report ensures you have those rights that one otherwise would get
with green card. There is no law that says you will get these freedoms with
Green cards only. And theae fixes will ensure you are mostly free. Hope this
explains why there is a gift of freedom in the box, but you are unable to
see it.
======
Question: I do not know whether I should say "Good job IV"...I can't
convince myself as to what in the world is called a "technical glitch" (back
in May) when it is a simple report release....it is not as if all the
things mentioned in the report are already implemented....
Are we saying that there is a technical glitch in White House to upload a
simple report and that took 2.5 months to fix?
IMMIGRATION VOICE Answer: Why dont you call the WH and ask yourself? We are
only telling the truth as we are told. And with that, we have no incentive
to convice you or anyone else with the cause for the delay. It may seem
simple to you, maybe you dont understand the complexity of the process or
the change, who knows, but please do let us know the nature of technical
glitch when you get that from WH.
Look, at the end of the day, WH or DHS or USCIS owes you nothing, nada, zero
. You might as well rot in hell, and no body is responsible for you. The
fact that someone listened and did something that will help improve the
condition of your life, even if you cant see it now, in time you will. Srini
Tata, there is nothing wrong in showing some appreciation once in while,
specifically when someone does something for you. Funny how things work,
because you are worried about 2.5 months delay (in the past) without caring
much about how these fixes will effect your next 10 years.
And if you think you paying taxes entitles you for anything then why are you
looking for answers here? Did you pay taxes to us?
===
Question: how long would it take to implement these fixes.. 1 / 2 / 3../ n
years ?
IMMIGRATION VOICE Answer: You dont trust the government, you want timeline,
you dont like the fixes, they are not enough!
Is there something else? If you dont want to step up and do your share,
other than posting when something comes out, then how do you expect to have
any influence over the changes? Try to make your own commitment, and not ask
others for things for which you havent worked for.
As for the timeline - some fixes will be done through Memo, and could be
implemented in 2-3 months, some will need to go through regulatory process,
it could take up to an year’
=====
Question: Any update on "Pre-register" after 1-140 ? Is that completely DEAD?
IMMIGRATION VOICE Answer: Please STOP calling it preregister and EAD For
I140. You and others dont know, but using these terms abd repeatedly asking
the same question over and over again has severely affect your chance of
filing AOS
These are new fixes, in addition to EAD for I140. EAD for I140 is no good
without these fixes.
===
a*r
68 楼
公开听证这些程序还得走，2016能批准就不错了。比照H4 EAD的Timeline，有些可能到
奥巴马下台都实施不了。
【在 B********n 的大作中提到】
: 对，但是这些都是他们可以做的，能绕开两会不需要他们投票的，上了奥巴马桌子签字
: 就能过的
奥巴马下台都实施不了。
【在 B********n 的大作中提到】
: 对，但是这些都是他们可以做的，能绕开两会不需要他们投票的，上了奥巴马桌子签字
: 就能过的
B*n
69 楼
看下面人什么时候把具体计划放他桌上
收到了就签了呗
【在 v***a 的大作中提到】
: 观海同志什么时候签?
收到了就签了呗
【在 v***a 的大作中提到】
: 观海同志什么时候签?
B*n
70 楼
有些不需要听证啊
还有些已经做完的事情
你们扫一扫全文行不行，还有附录
【在 a****r 的大作中提到】
: 公开听证这些程序还得走，2016能批准就不错了。比照H4 EAD的Timeline，有些可能到
: 奥巴马下台都实施不了。
还有些已经做完的事情
你们扫一扫全文行不行，还有附录
【在 a****r 的大作中提到】
: 公开听证这些程序还得走，2016能批准就不错了。比照H4 EAD的Timeline，有些可能到
: 奥巴马下台都实施不了。
W*o
71 楼
"most immigrants are simple minded folks"
These IV people sound like pretty straight talkers!!
don
why
【在 X**J 的大作中提到】
: Hope this interpretation from immigration voice is reliable
: JULY 15, 2015 UPDATE & CLARIFICATIONS. PLEASE LIKE AND SHARE THIS SO THAT
: ALL CONFUSION CAN BE CLEAR ABOUT THE REPORT ON THE FORUMS.
: Please continue to visit immigration voice.org and immigration voice
: Facebook page to more information and action items in the days to come.
: Question: IV asked us to have "Papers Ready". If this is just a report I don
: 't understand why you asked us to have papers ready.
: IMMIGRATION VOICE Answer: We have said this before, but some folks keep
: asking the same question again.
: The original plan was to make VB current for the month of July. That is why
These IV people sound like pretty straight talkers!!
don
why
【在 X**J 的大作中提到】
: Hope this interpretation from immigration voice is reliable
: JULY 15, 2015 UPDATE & CLARIFICATIONS. PLEASE LIKE AND SHARE THIS SO THAT
: ALL CONFUSION CAN BE CLEAR ABOUT THE REPORT ON THE FORUMS.
: Please continue to visit immigration voice.org and immigration voice
: Facebook page to more information and action items in the days to come.
: Question: IV asked us to have "Papers Ready". If this is just a report I don
: 't understand why you asked us to have papers ready.
: IMMIGRATION VOICE Answer: We have said this before, but some folks keep
: asking the same question again.
: The original plan was to make VB current for the month of July. That is why
相关阅读
DS160表格两天了，都没人报绿？奇怪的RFE，倒霉透了RD的具体时间h4 RFE一周都没收到，寄丢了？只能SR?还有别的办法吗？tcs在training收到议员的回复，这是确认relink上了吧？TSC如果不用处理485了的话，是不是会专注点发EAD卡了Visa number runing out出生问题.................应当真的是U了娱乐一下，看看这个预测请教各位关于EB3升级EB2的问题NSC一般网上什么时候有update有收到welcome notice然后又收到RFE的么？更新个TSC EAD卡寄出时间请问可以取消给USCIS 的支票么？谢谢！485提交了9份G-1145表，只收到4份通知EB3明年C的可能性有多大！能不能报个收到绿卡的时间