zuyeye 老大,多谢好文分享!
我现在正在写一个Referee Report on a revised manuscript. Should my
recommendation for acceptance/revision/rejection be completely based on how
the authors have responded to MY comments on the initial submission? I ask
this question because the authors have done a good job in dealing with my
concerns (so if this is the only thing I should care, I would recommend
acceptance) but their handling of the editor's and the other referee's
questions do not sound good to me (so I think more revision is needed). In
this case, should I recommend acceptance or revision? Should I talk about
how well I think the authors have dealt with the other comments?
Also if I don't agree with some of comments by the referee and the Editor, i
.e., I side with the authors, should I mention this to the Editor as well?
Many thanks.