可以理解他的决定 但他这个官司确实影响很不好 我挺同意这个评论的 This is so sad. Without justifying her actions, I think this mom was only thinking about the implications for her family and her daughter financially, and not the bigger picture of what a lawsuit might mean for others. While I read this letter, I kept thinking of the book "Handle with Care" by Jody Picoult, in which a mother of a child with osteogenisis imperfecta (brittle bone syndrome),launches a lawsuit against her OB GYN for "wrongful birth" stating that had she been offered available prenatal testing, she would have terminated the pregnancy. She loved her daughter, but wanted to ensure that she was getting her child the best care possible to meet her complex needs. I hope that this was the case in this real life example... http://bloom-parentingkidswithdisabilities.blogspot.com/2011/05
【在 d**********6 的大作中提到】 : 可以理解他的决定 但他这个官司确实影响很不好 : 我挺同意这个评论的 : This is so sad. Without justifying her actions, I think this mom was only : thinking about the implications for her family and her daughter financially, : and not the bigger picture of what a lawsuit might mean for others. While I : read this letter, I kept thinking of the book "Handle with Care" by Jody : Picoult, in which a mother of a child with osteogenisis imperfecta (brittle : bone syndrome),launches a lawsuit against her OB GYN for "wrongful birth" : stating that had she been offered available prenatal testing, she would have : terminated the pregnancy. She loved her daughter, but wanted to ensure that
【在 d**********6 的大作中提到】 : 可以理解他的决定 但他这个官司确实影响很不好 : 我挺同意这个评论的 : This is so sad. Without justifying her actions, I think this mom was only : thinking about the implications for her family and her daughter financially, : and not the bigger picture of what a lawsuit might mean for others. While I : read this letter, I kept thinking of the book "Handle with Care" by Jody : Picoult, in which a mother of a child with osteogenisis imperfecta (brittle : bone syndrome),launches a lawsuit against her OB GYN for "wrongful birth" : stating that had she been offered available prenatal testing, she would have : terminated the pregnancy. She loved her daughter, but wanted to ensure that
l*l
14 楼
严重同意
【在 C***O 的大作中提到】 : 这事放在谁身上,也不会因为影响而放弃给孩子争取一个保障 : : financially, : I : brittle : have : that
【在 d**********6 的大作中提到】 : 可以理解他的决定 但他这个官司确实影响很不好 : 我挺同意这个评论的 : This is so sad. Without justifying her actions, I think this mom was only : thinking about the implications for her family and her daughter financially, : and not the bigger picture of what a lawsuit might mean for others. While I : read this letter, I kept thinking of the book "Handle with Care" by Jody : Picoult, in which a mother of a child with osteogenisis imperfecta (brittle : bone syndrome),launches a lawsuit against her OB GYN for "wrongful birth" : stating that had she been offered available prenatal testing, she would have : terminated the pregnancy. She loved her daughter, but wanted to ensure that
you are right he didn't say that EXPLICITLY. (And if he ever dares to say that explicitly, i could imagine how you would comment on him now.) BUT still to me, whether he makes an explicit statement or not doesn't mean it's a controversial topic on who is the PRIMARY care giver of their daughter. And of course, this is just my understanding and everyone's reading comprehension is different, hehe. But, i didn't see posts arguing on who is the PRIMARY care giver either. As i said, if you even think this is controversial, then we simply lose the common base to discuss anything about them.
【在 c*******s 的大作中提到】 : 有争议, even 八年哥 didn't say that, how do you know this?
c*s
66 楼
then tell me, who was taking care of the girl when he was in work? Who spent more time with the girl? In another post, people said he went back to home to check his wife, which mean his wife was doing most the baby sitting during the day, right? When I read, I never blindly believe the story.
would mean on is about
【在 o******y 的大作中提到】 : you are right he didn't say that EXPLICITLY. : (And if he ever dares to say that explicitly, i could imagine how you would : comment on him now.) : BUT still to me, whether he makes an explicit statement or not doesn't mean : it's a controversial topic on who is the PRIMARY care giver of their : daughter. And of course, this is just my understanding and everyone's : reading comprehension is different, hehe. But, i didn't see posts arguing on : who is the PRIMARY care giver either. As i said, if you even think this is : controversial, then we simply lose the common base to discuss anything about : them.