[推荐] CCFL backlight technolgy 的电脑显示器# Hardware - 计算机硬件
c*n
1 楼
【 以下文字转载自 USANews 讨论区 】
发信人: calman (两年之后), 信区: USANews
标 题: 著名华裔数学家陶哲轩证明了：Trump unfit to be president！
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Sun Jun 5 19:10:16 2016, 美东)
http://terrytao.wordpress.com/2016/06/04/it-ought-to-be-common-knowledge-that-donald-trump-is-not-fit-for-the-presidency-of-the-united-states-of-america/
Proposition 1. The presumptive nominee of the Republican Party, Donald
Trump, is not even remotely qualified to carry out the duties of the
presidency of the United States of America.
Proof. I believe there are multiple proofs of Proposition 1. Clinton’s
argument, based primarily on foreign policy expertise and temperament, is my
favourite, but the other two arguments I linked to, of Mitt Romney and of
John Oliver, I think would also suffice; in addition to foreign policy and
temperament, Romney also discusses Trump’s lack of economic expertise, and
Oliver brings up Trump’s lack of regard for facts and their bearing on
policy (e.g. on Trump’s famous “border wall” proposal). One could also
demonstrate Proposition 1 by other means, for instance using his lack of
prior experience in any sort of public office or service, or his
demonstrated lack of regard for basic constitutional principles such as
freedom of the press and an independent judiciary. This is probably not an
exhaustive list of possible approaches to prove Proposition 1.
发信人: calman (两年之后), 信区: USANews
标 题: 著名华裔数学家陶哲轩证明了：Trump unfit to be president！
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Sun Jun 5 19:10:16 2016, 美东)
http://terrytao.wordpress.com/2016/06/04/it-ought-to-be-common-knowledge-that-donald-trump-is-not-fit-for-the-presidency-of-the-united-states-of-america/
Proposition 1. The presumptive nominee of the Republican Party, Donald
Trump, is not even remotely qualified to carry out the duties of the
presidency of the United States of America.
Proof. I believe there are multiple proofs of Proposition 1. Clinton’s
argument, based primarily on foreign policy expertise and temperament, is my
favourite, but the other two arguments I linked to, of Mitt Romney and of
John Oliver, I think would also suffice; in addition to foreign policy and
temperament, Romney also discusses Trump’s lack of economic expertise, and
Oliver brings up Trump’s lack of regard for facts and their bearing on
policy (e.g. on Trump’s famous “border wall” proposal). One could also
demonstrate Proposition 1 by other means, for instance using his lack of
prior experience in any sort of public office or service, or his
demonstrated lack of regard for basic constitutional principles such as
freedom of the press and an independent judiciary. This is probably not an
exhaustive list of possible approaches to prove Proposition 1.
