硬盘已经失去了原本的意义 - 未名空间MITBBS历史存档

m*12016-05-09 07:05

1 楼

Sad, need to work on this again.
Just got the RFE.
Original claimed: Original contribution, publication
In my original contribution part, put additional evidence such as review (
only 1) for a journal, and written by others...
Criteria met: Publication, review, written by others.
However, original contribution is not met, because of international
recognition. The IO critiqued on my recommendation letters!
Help!

b*d2016-05-09 07:05

2 楼

近来听到这个词“硬盘中的女神”，你知道是什么意思么？其实就是指包括苍井空在内的影响力巨大日本Av女优。瞬间我对硬盘这个概念有了兴趣，因为原本和色情没有半毛钱关系的储存器和色情发生了关联。我之前买过硬盘，在里面也存过Av。我的同学居然无一例外地在硬盘里储存Av片。有的甚至储藏了好几百部好几千部，甚至专门买储存器来存储A片，因为储存在电脑上不太方便，我们电脑老师甚至教我们怎么发现孩子们在电脑上隐藏的色情片，所以只好储存在硬盘里。而且，近些年我经常在网上遇到一些人，他们碰上我便问道“你要硬盘吗”。我刚开始的时候还纳闷，以为他在推销优盘之类的东西，可是后来发现他们推销的都是Av色情片还有据说自慰的视频。我很惊讶地发现，硬盘已经不是本来的硬盘，而是关于色情的硬盘。硬盘原本是用来储存各类文件的，可是现在却发生了功能的变异，主要储存色情片，所以有的人才直言不讳地说“硬盘里的女神”。硬盘已经开始约等于色情片。你要硬盘吗，这意思相当于，你需要色情片吗。

e*c2016-05-09 07:05

3 楼

bless

【在 m*******1 的大作中提到】

: Sad, need to work on this again.
: Just got the RFE.
: Original claimed: Original contribution, publication
: In my original contribution part, put additional evidence such as review (
: only 1) for a journal, and written by others...
: Criteria met: Publication, review, written by others.
: However, original contribution is not met, because of international
: recognition. The IO critiqued on my recommendation letters!
: Help!

e*i2016-05-09 07:05

4 楼

we need robot

内的影响力巨大日本Av女优。瞬间我对硬盘这个概念有了兴趣，因为原本和色情没有半
毛钱关系的储存器和色情发生了关联。我之前买过硬盘，在里面也存过Av。我的同学居
然无一例外地在硬盘里储存

【在 b********d 的大作中提到】

: 近来听到这个词“硬盘中的女神”，你知道是什么意思么？其实就是指包括苍井空在内的影响力巨大日本Av女优。瞬间我对硬盘这个概念有了兴趣，因为原本和色情没有半毛钱关系的储存器和色情发生了关联。我之前买过硬盘，在里面也存过Av。我的同学居然无一例外地在硬盘里储存Av片。有的甚至储藏了好几百部好几千部，甚至专门买储存器来存储A片，因为储存在电脑上不太方便，我们电脑老师甚至教我们怎么发现孩子们在电脑上隐藏的色情片，所以只好储存在硬盘里。而且，近些年我经常在网上遇到一些人，他们碰上我便问道“你要硬盘吗”。我刚开始的时候还纳闷，以为他在推销优盘之类的东西，可是后来发现他们推销的都是Av色情片还有据说自慰的视频。我很惊讶地发现，硬盘已经不是本来的硬盘，而是关于色情的硬盘。硬盘原本是用来储存各类文件的，可是现在却发生了功能的变异，主要储存色情片，所以有的人才直言不讳地说“硬盘里的女神”。硬盘已经开始约等于色情片。你要硬盘吗，这意思相当于，你需要色情片吗。

p*32016-05-09 07:05

5 楼

Bless

j*r2016-05-09 07:05

6 楼

机器人也需要硬盘看毛片？用砂纸撸么？

内的影响力巨大日本Av女优。瞬间我对硬盘这个概念有了兴趣，因为原本和色情没有半
毛钱关系的储存器和色情发生了关联。我之前买过硬盘，在里面也存过Av。我的同学居
然无一例外地在硬盘里储存Av片。有的甚至储藏了好几百部好几千部，甚至专门买储存
器来存储A片，因为储存在电脑上不太方便，我们电脑老师甚至教我们怎么发现孩子们
在电脑上隐藏的色情片，所以只好储存在硬盘里。而且，近些年我经常在网上遇到一些
人，他们碰上我便问道“你要硬盘吗”。我刚开始的: 时候还纳闷，以为他在推销优盘
之类的东西，可是后来发现他们推销的都是Av色情片还有据说自慰的视频。我很惊讶地
发现，硬盘已经不是本来的硬盘，而是关于色情的硬盘。硬盘原本是用来储存各类文件
的，可是现在却发生了功能的变异，主要储存色情片，所以有的人才直言不讳地说“硬
盘里的女神”。硬盘已经开始约等于色情片。你要硬盘吗，这意思相当于，你需要色情
片吗。

【在 b********d 的大作中提到】

: 近来听到这个词“硬盘中的女神”，你知道是什么意思么？其实就是指包括苍井空在内的影响力巨大日本Av女优。瞬间我对硬盘这个概念有了兴趣，因为原本和色情没有半毛钱关系的储存器和色情发生了关联。我之前买过硬盘，在里面也存过Av。我的同学居然无一例外地在硬盘里储存Av片。有的甚至储藏了好几百部好几千部，甚至专门买储存器来存储A片，因为储存在电脑上不太方便，我们电脑老师甚至教我们怎么发现孩子们在电脑上隐藏的色情片，所以只好储存在硬盘里。而且，近些年我经常在网上遇到一些人，他们碰上我便问道“你要硬盘吗”。我刚开始的时候还纳闷，以为他在推销优盘之类的东西，可是后来发现他们推销的都是Av色情片还有据说自慰的视频。我很惊讶地发现，硬盘已经不是本来的硬盘，而是关于色情的硬盘。硬盘原本是用来储存各类文件的，可是现在却发生了功能的变异，主要储存色情片，所以有的人才直言不讳地说“硬盘里的女神”。硬盘已经开始约等于色情片。你要硬盘吗，这意思相当于，你需要色情片吗。

Y*Z2016-05-09 07:05

7 楼

blessing

d*y2016-05-09 07:05

8 楼

毛片存储在电脑里固然不好，存储在硬盘中也不便，不如存储在键盘中，存储在鼠标中
更佳。

j*82016-05-09 07:05

9 楼

bless

d*y2016-05-09 07:05

10 楼

毛片存储在电脑里固然不好，存储在硬盘中也不便，不如存储在键盘中，存储在鼠标中
更佳。

w*s2016-05-09 07:05

11 楼

最近好像都这样。。。

【在 m*******1 的大作中提到】

: Sad, need to work on this again.
: Just got the RFE.
: Original claimed: Original contribution, publication
: In my original contribution part, put additional evidence such as review (
: only 1) for a journal, and written by others...
: Criteria met: Publication, review, written by others.
: However, original contribution is not met, because of international
: recognition. The IO critiqued on my recommendation letters!
: Help!

c*a2016-05-09 07:05

12 楼

最近tsc该政策了。痛苦啊

r*d2016-05-09 07:05

13 楼

什么意思？
说你original contribution 不符合？
但是符合其他3条？
有2条就可以过了，还要求什么？

c*a2016-05-09 07:05

14 楼

他只claim了二条啊，只过了publication啊。

r*d2016-05-09 07:05

15 楼

lz的title说even 3 criteria met.
我不明白他说的这3条是什么。

M*h2016-05-09 07:05

16 楼

Bless~~~~~~~~~

【在 m*******1 的大作中提到】

: Sad, need to work on this again.
: Just got the RFE.
: Original claimed: Original contribution, publication
: In my original contribution part, put additional evidence such as review (
: only 1) for a journal, and written by others...
: Criteria met: Publication, review, written by others.
: However, original contribution is not met, because of international
: recognition. The IO critiqued on my recommendation letters!
: Help!

j*i2016-05-09 07:05

17 楼

是不是和我情况一样，没有claim的也被认可了？

【在 r***d 的大作中提到】

: lz的title说even 3 criteria met.
: 我不明白他说的这3条是什么。

r*d2016-05-09 07:05

18 楼

那被认可，算通过了吗？

【在 j******i 的大作中提到】

: 是不是和我情况一样，没有claim的也被认可了？

w*s2016-05-09 07:05

19 楼

3条都met
但是totality不行

【在 r***d 的大作中提到】

: lz的title说even 3 criteria met.
: 我不明白他说的这3条是什么。

i*u2016-05-09 07:05

20 楼

bless!

l*t2016-05-09 07:05

21 楼

bless! In your recommendation letters, did you stress on the international
recognition?

发信人: mitbbsll1 (banana), 信区: Immigration
标题: Sad...EB1B RFE even 3 criteria met
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Mon Mar 21 16:58:00 2011, 美东)
Sad, need to work on this again.
Just got the RFE.
Original claimed: Original contribution, publication
In my original contribution part, put additional evidence such as review (
only 1) for a journal, and written by others...
Criteria met: Publication, review, written by others.
However, original contribution is not met, because of international
recognition. The IO critiqued on my recommendation letters!
Help!

【在 m*******1 的大作中提到】

: Sad, need to work on this again.
: Just got the RFE.
: Original claimed: Original contribution, publication
: In my original contribution part, put additional evidence such as review (
: only 1) for a journal, and written by others...
: Criteria met: Publication, review, written by others.
: However, original contribution is not met, because of international
: recognition. The IO critiqued on my recommendation letters!
: Help!

m*12016-05-09 07:05

22 楼

Sorry can't type in Chinese here and for the confusion in my original post.
In my petition letter, I only claimed original contribution and publication,
using judge of others and media report as supporting evidence for
contribution.
However, the IO agreed on media report, judge, and publication, but not on
contribution.
S/he thinks that the recommendation letters are vague.
"these letter are vague, and their comments are not supported by the
evidence. For example, Dr. xx states, "Cell Metabolism ranks 2nd out of 105
leading journals in the field of endocrinology and metabolism and only
publishes work of exceptional significance. Publication in Cell Metabolism
convincingly supports Dr. Me's significant contribution to his field." Yet,
the information about this publication, which was submitted with the
petition, does not define "exceptional significance," nor does it state that
it only publishes work of this caliber.
To assist in determining whether the beneficiary's contributions are
original, the petitioner may submit:
Objective documentary evidence of the beneficiary's contribution to their
academic field.
Documentary evidence that people throughout the field currently consider the
beneficiary's work original.
Testimony and/or support letters from experts which discuss the beneficiary'
s original scientific or scholarly research contributions to their academic
field. (must provide as much detail as possible about the beneficiary's
contribution and must explain, in detail, how the contribution was "original
" (not merely replicating the work of others). General statements regarding
the importance of the endeavors are insufficient.)
Evidence that the beneficiary's original contribution has provoked
widespread public commentary in the field or has been widely cited.
Evidence of the beneficiary's work being implemented by others..."
Background: articles 13 (IF 5-19), meeting presentations 12.
Citation: >130 in ISI, >170 in Google scholar
Research Associate
In my petition letter, I did analysis of citation such as country
distribution, map. Seems the IO ignored this.
In my recommendation letters (7, 4 independent, 1 from UK, 1 from Austria),
they did mention my work is the first one..., international recognition.
Any suggestion is appreciated.

l*t2016-05-09 07:05

23 楼

It seems that the IO gave you very nice instructions on what kinds of
evidence he wants to see. You might have to dig deep into your materials
especially your citations and media reports since they are documentary
evidence, and re-organize them to show "international" and "outstanding".
Letters from people who cited your paper should also be helpful.

发信人: mitbbsll1 (banana), 信区: Immigration
标题: Re: Sad...EB1B RFE even 3 criteria met
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Tue Mar 22 10:09:09 2011, 美东)
Sorry can't type in Chinese here and for the confusion in my original post.
In my petition letter, I only claimed original contribution and publication,
using judge of others and media report as supporting evidence for
contribution.
However, the IO agreed on media report, judge, and publication, but not on
contribution.
S/he thinks that the recommendation letters are vague.
"these letter are vague, and their comments are not supported by the
evidence. For example, Dr. xx states, "Cell Metabolism ranks 2nd out of 105
leading journals in the field of endocrinology and metabolism and only
publishes work of exceptional significance. Publication in Cell Metabolism
convincingly supports Dr. Me's significant contribution to his field." Yet,
the information about this publication, which was submitted with the
petition, does not define "exceptional significance," nor does it state that
it only publishes work of this caliber.
To assist in determining whether the beneficiary's contributions are
original, the petitioner may submit:
Objective documentary evidence of the beneficiary's contribution to their
academic field.
Documentary evidence that people throughout the field currently consider the
beneficiary's work original.
Testimony and/or support letters from experts which discuss the beneficiary'
s original scientific or scholarly research contributions to their academic
field. (must provide as much detail as possible about the beneficiary's
contribution and must explain, in detail, how the contribution was "original
" (not merely replicating the work of others). General statements regarding
the importance of the endeavors are insufficient.)
Evidence that the beneficiary's original contribution has provoked
widespread public commentary in the field or has been widely cited.
Evidence of the beneficiary's work being implemented by others..."
Background: articles 13 (IF 5-19), meeting presentations 12.
Citation: >130 in ISI, >170 in Google scholar
Research Associate
In my petition letter, I did analysis of citation such as country
distribution, map. Seems the IO ignored this.
In my recommendation letters (7, 4 independent, 1 from UK, 1 from Austria),
they did mention my work is the first one..., international recognition.
Any suggestion is appreciated.

【在 m*******1 的大作中提到】

: Sorry can't type in Chinese here and for the confusion in my original post.
: In my petition letter, I only claimed original contribution and publication,
: using judge of others and media report as supporting evidence for
: contribution.
: However, the IO agreed on media report, judge, and publication, but not on
: contribution.
: S/he thinks that the recommendation letters are vague.
: "these letter are vague, and their comments are not supported by the
: evidence. For example, Dr. xx states, "Cell Metabolism ranks 2nd out of 105
: leading journals in the field of endocrinology and metabolism and only

d*i2016-05-09 07:05

24 楼

这IO脑子进水了，楼主运气比较差，好好再准备一下RFE，应该能过。

z*u2016-05-09 07:05

25 楼

bless