TSC Eb1a weak case gets RFE, looking for help# Immigration - 落地生根
B*i
1 楼
抱着机会注意态度来蒙了一下,被RFE了, 不该pp的
PhD in 2009, now in national lab, major: fundamental physical chemistry
Paper: only 8, general level journals (very slow in our field, takes very
long to write paper) conference abstracts: 12
Review: 35 for 11 journals
Claim contribution, publication and review.
Admit publication and review, and also admit media report although I don't
claim. So step1 admit I meet three criteria
Q1: In response, for the step 1, do I still need to prove the contribution
part?
For step 2, ask me to prove I am top in the filed and with sustained
national/international acclaims
IO questioned several points:
1.Ask me to explain how my research publications has significantly
influenced the field. Like:
Publications has been cited significantly by others in the field at a
national or international level.
这个要命啊,本人少于60个引用.基础研究引用少啊
做了油灯图之类的,IO完全没看,数目也错了
2.说我是promising young researcher, 但是eb1a要求很高, 要满足 you are at apex
of your specialization.
3.说我发文章了,但是老板才是主要贡献,我是小弟而已:
这个晕倒,我好多文章只有我和老板是作者,还是被鄙视,怎么回复?
4.审过文章,但是要我证明是因为sustained national acclaim才选我当reviewer的.
这个不难,有几封主编的信,也审过好的稿子
然后建议了一些证据:
1.大奖候选人; no
2.editorial board;no
3. 审过大量的稿子; yes
4.发文章在好杂志; 这个只能靠吹了 (没有好文章,只有cover 和 review 可以吹, 唉)
5. 被牛人大量引用. 唉
IO是277,没怎么见过,谁有跟他打过交道,分享一下经验
感觉IO第二步很严,小弟非常感谢大家的建议
PhD in 2009, now in national lab, major: fundamental physical chemistry
Paper: only 8, general level journals (very slow in our field, takes very
long to write paper) conference abstracts: 12
Review: 35 for 11 journals
Claim contribution, publication and review.
Admit publication and review, and also admit media report although I don't
claim. So step1 admit I meet three criteria
Q1: In response, for the step 1, do I still need to prove the contribution
part?
For step 2, ask me to prove I am top in the filed and with sustained
national/international acclaims
IO questioned several points:
1.Ask me to explain how my research publications has significantly
influenced the field. Like:
Publications has been cited significantly by others in the field at a
national or international level.
这个要命啊,本人少于60个引用.基础研究引用少啊
做了油灯图之类的,IO完全没看,数目也错了
2.说我是promising young researcher, 但是eb1a要求很高, 要满足 you are at apex
of your specialization.
3.说我发文章了,但是老板才是主要贡献,我是小弟而已:
这个晕倒,我好多文章只有我和老板是作者,还是被鄙视,怎么回复?
4.审过文章,但是要我证明是因为sustained national acclaim才选我当reviewer的.
这个不难,有几封主编的信,也审过好的稿子
然后建议了一些证据:
1.大奖候选人; no
2.editorial board;no
3. 审过大量的稿子; yes
4.发文章在好杂志; 这个只能靠吹了 (没有好文章,只有cover 和 review 可以吹, 唉)
5. 被牛人大量引用. 唉
IO是277,没怎么见过,谁有跟他打过交道,分享一下经验
感觉IO第二步很严,小弟非常感谢大家的建议
