t*t
2 楼
Background:
2008 US PhD from 3rd tier U. Now Research faculty in a 4th tier U.
Papers (2008-present): 9 (2 reviews, 5 1st author, 3 corresponding author),
1 submitted, 1 coauthor under review. All top journals in my field.
Only 24 citations (mostly self-citation; most citations are within US)
Oral presentations: 2
Abstracts: 11
Review: 3 journals (top in my field), 21 times; committee member of a Ph.D.
student.
PI of a small grant. However, half of the awardees are from outside the U.S.
Also, one Nobel Laureate was an awardee and is now on their committee.
1. Shall I claim two or three criteria (publication, review , contribution) ?
2. If claim two, which is better, Publication+Review or Contribution+Review?
If claim contribution, my citation record is too weak but the grant awardee
distribution and that Nobel Laureate are bonus.
Any input will be appreciated!
2008 US PhD from 3rd tier U. Now Research faculty in a 4th tier U.
Papers (2008-present): 9 (2 reviews, 5 1st author, 3 corresponding author),
1 submitted, 1 coauthor under review. All top journals in my field.
Only 24 citations (mostly self-citation; most citations are within US)
Oral presentations: 2
Abstracts: 11
Review: 3 journals (top in my field), 21 times; committee member of a Ph.D.
student.
PI of a small grant. However, half of the awardees are from outside the U.S.
Also, one Nobel Laureate was an awardee and is now on their committee.
1. Shall I claim two or three criteria (publication, review , contribution) ?
2. If claim two, which is better, Publication+Review or Contribution+Review?
If claim contribution, my citation record is too weak but the grant awardee
distribution and that Nobel Laureate are bonus.
Any input will be appreciated!
f*9
3 楼
It looks good.
C*y
4 楼
Claim 3
Contribution is a must
,
.
S.
【在 t****t 的大作中提到】
: Background:
: 2008 US PhD from 3rd tier U. Now Research faculty in a 4th tier U.
: Papers (2008-present): 9 (2 reviews, 5 1st author, 3 corresponding author),
: 1 submitted, 1 coauthor under review. All top journals in my field.
: Only 24 citations (mostly self-citation; most citations are within US)
: Oral presentations: 2
: Abstracts: 11
: Review: 3 journals (top in my field), 21 times; committee member of a Ph.D.
: student.
: PI of a small grant. However, half of the awardees are from outside the U.S.
Contribution is a must
,
.
S.
【在 t****t 的大作中提到】
: Background:
: 2008 US PhD from 3rd tier U. Now Research faculty in a 4th tier U.
: Papers (2008-present): 9 (2 reviews, 5 1st author, 3 corresponding author),
: 1 submitted, 1 coauthor under review. All top journals in my field.
: Only 24 citations (mostly self-citation; most citations are within US)
: Oral presentations: 2
: Abstracts: 11
: Review: 3 journals (top in my field), 21 times; committee member of a Ph.D.
: student.
: PI of a small grant. However, half of the awardees are from outside the U.S.
f*i
5 楼
you may try applying by phone call. that's how I got mine
【在 j***a 的大作中提到】
: apply in branch only, anybody have this card?
【在 j***a 的大作中提到】
: apply in branch only, anybody have this card?
t*t
6 楼
Why contribution is a must? Thanks!
【在 C*****y 的大作中提到】
: Claim 3
: Contribution is a must
:
: ,
: .
: S.
【在 C*****y 的大作中提到】
: Claim 3
: Contribution is a must
:
: ,
: .
: S.
c*d
7 楼
我有这张卡。我个人认为不咋样，只不过是第一张卡就一直没关
T*y
8 楼
Because contribution is almost as totality.
Now the IOs check the individual claims on face value first, and then
evaluate the totality. You may pass all the individual claims, but the
totality is still not satisfied.
Totality is like the overall impression whether your work is internationally
influential.
【在 t****t 的大作中提到】
: Why contribution is a must? Thanks!
Now the IOs check the individual claims on face value first, and then
evaluate the totality. You may pass all the individual claims, but the
totality is still not satisfied.
Totality is like the overall impression whether your work is internationally
influential.
【在 t****t 的大作中提到】
: Why contribution is a must? Thanks!
n*e
9 楼
have it for 9 month already
C*y
10 楼
Contribution is the key for EB1 category. You must satisfy it if you pass
it.
【在 t****t 的大作中提到】
: Why contribution is a must? Thanks!
it.
【在 t****t 的大作中提到】
: Why contribution is a must? Thanks!
s*g
11 楼
无数人有这张卡吧
这张卡当时还是很神的
现在缩水了 但也还行吧
主要的问题是如果自己信用资料不够强 还是别乱试
不少人被降级批卡 拿了鸡肋卡不知道怎么办
这张卡当时还是很神的
现在缩水了 但也还行吧
主要的问题是如果自己信用资料不够强 还是别乱试
不少人被降级批卡 拿了鸡肋卡不知道怎么办
a*n
12 楼
正解
internationally
【在 T*******y 的大作中提到】
: Because contribution is almost as totality.
: Now the IOs check the individual claims on face value first, and then
: evaluate the totality. You may pass all the individual claims, but the
: totality is still not satisfied.
: Totality is like the overall impression whether your work is internationally
: influential.
internationally
【在 T*******y 的大作中提到】
: Because contribution is almost as totality.
: Now the IOs check the individual claims on face value first, and then
: evaluate the totality. You may pass all the individual claims, but the
: totality is still not satisfied.
: Totality is like the overall impression whether your work is internationally
: influential.
B*y
13 楼
一般有开卡Bonus么？
【在 s**********g 的大作中提到】
: 无数人有这张卡吧
: 这张卡当时还是很神的
: 现在缩水了 但也还行吧
: 主要的问题是如果自己信用资料不够强 还是别乱试
: 不少人被降级批卡 拿了鸡肋卡不知道怎么办
【在 s**********g 的大作中提到】
: 无数人有这张卡吧
: 这张卡当时还是很神的
: 现在缩水了 但也还行吧
: 主要的问题是如果自己信用资料不够强 还是别乱试
: 不少人被降级批卡 拿了鸡肋卡不知道怎么办
相关阅读
出生证明必须用原件吗？ 还是复印件，扫描的然后再打印都可以？侏儒婊子邢慧强半婊子中国海洋大学半婊子保研黑幕 2003年大连理工大学电子系考研失利的青岛二中学生侏儒婊子邢慧强被中国海洋大学电子系破格录取为中国海洋大学电子系的硕士，如果给半婊子中国海洋大学加上一个想办父母过来TSC 10/25 RD, 昨天绿了审稿推荐人几个合适？请问RFE的84或者87天要求非常严格吗绿了！NSC请问版上有自己出钱并DIY EB1B 的吗?What is Form I-767CEB1B 推荐信问题Nature China的Research Highlights算媒体报道么h1b 延期 -鸡毛信求建议！出生公证一问TB检测阳性，血检也是阳性，但是CXR showed no evidence of ac485 RFE 求解律师一般对推荐信做什么修改Question about I-130绿卡体检诊所求推荐 Palo Alto附近真诚请求paper review (viriology, vaccinology, microbology)