Redian新闻
>
请教一个EB1B推荐信的问题,请有经验的人指点
avatar
请教一个EB1B推荐信的问题,请有经验的人指点# Immigration - 落地生根
e*e
1
The idea is to explore all the combinations of weights array by masking and
bit shifting.
i.e. v1=5 w1=3, v2=3 w2=2, v3=4 w3=1, we form the two arrays as follows:
values[5, 3, 4], weights[3, 2, 1], W = 5.
for weights array[3, 2, 1], we want the all subsets of the elements.
such as:
[](no element)
[1]
[2]
[3]
[1 2]
[1 3]
[2 3]
[1 2 3]
We can get this subsets by masking bit by bit if we think of the array
bitwise.
[3 2 1]
0 0 0 -> (no element)
0 0 1 -> [1]
0 1 0 -> [2]
1 0 0 -> [3]
1 0 1 -> [1 3]
... ..
The code is simple. Here it is. Any suggestion is welcome.
public int knapsack01BruteForce(int[] values, int[] weights, int W) {
int numOfCombinations = (int) Math.pow( 2, weights.length );

int maxValueSum = Integer.MIN_VALUE;
for ( int i = 0; i < numOfCombinations; i++ ) {
int mask = i;
int weightSum = 0;
int valueSum = 0;

for ( int j = 0; j < weights.length; j++ ) {
int isIncluded = mask & 1; // isInclude is 0 or 1.
weightSum += weights[j] * isIncluded;
valueSum += values[j] * isIncluded;
mask >>= 1;
}

if ( weightSum <= W && valueSum > maxValueSum)
maxValueSum = valueSum;
}

return maxValueSum;
}
avatar
l*o
2
Could anyone recommend English videos to teach toddler social skills? Like "
QiaoHu" in Chinese.
Key contents would be:
-Reporting problems to teacher, like pain/being hurt/not feeling well/
conflicts with peers
-Greeting properly
-Making friends
...Thanks!
avatar
K*g
3
公司律师说我刚毕业不久(1年半),必须证明我读phd期间三年的research经验。所以
就说RL from my PhD advisor is required.并且在一封独立人的推荐信里,特地在第
一段话中突出我的outstanding contributions 是“during his graduate study at
University of xxx." 请问这样子好吗?我总感觉这样子会weaken这个testimonial的
作用
另外一个就是在正文中提到我的paper的时候,还特别强调了”In his study, Dr. xx
and his PhD research supervisor, Dr. xxx, developed ...". 我觉得这样子就更加
weaken我的case了。
不管怎样,我还是会follow律师的意见,但是我很想知道其他有经验的人的看法。多谢
了。
avatar
a*t
4
toddler?太早了吧。再说这些幼儿园基本都会教的。
avatar
f*e
5
我觉得你的律师说的很有道理啊.
你要证明你有三年的工作经验. 如果你要算上GA的经验的话,你要证明你在读书其间的
研究也是OUTSTANDING的, 并且你还拿到了你的DEGREE.
更恰当的做法是单独写个SECTION说明有三年的工作经验.
avatar
l*o
6
Our daycare here seems not working on it.
I bring it up because the teacher told me "XX never cry even if he hurt
himself or is sick, he's quiet." The teacher is happy with that, and
believes that's his personality, but I know it's not true. He cries for help
at home all the time, for every tiny bitty thing. I think he needs to learn
how to express his emotions and needs to teacher when necessary.
avatar
T*y
7
Your lawyer's right, you need to include your Ph.D. experience as your
outstanding research experience.
The first sentence seems fine.
In the second sentence, it's specified that you and your advisor did the
work, and it sounds a bit unnecessary. You can just say that "Dr. xx's
research in yyy has influenced zzz", and it can be mentioned elsewhere that
the research in yyy is your Ph.D. work, but the fact that this work was done
during your Ph.D. needs not to be specified clearly everywhere.

以就说RL from my PhD advisor is required.并且在一封独立人的推荐信里,特地在
第一段话中突出我的outstanding contributions 是“during his graduate study at
University of xxx." 请问这样子好吗?我总感觉这样子会weaken这个testimonial的
作用
xx and his PhD research supervisor, Dr. xxx, developed ...". 我觉得这样子就
更加weaken我的case了。
谢了。

【在 K******g 的大作中提到】
: 公司律师说我刚毕业不久(1年半),必须证明我读phd期间三年的research经验。所以
: 就说RL from my PhD advisor is required.并且在一封独立人的推荐信里,特地在第
: 一段话中突出我的outstanding contributions 是“during his graduate study at
: University of xxx." 请问这样子好吗?我总感觉这样子会weaken这个testimonial的
: 作用
: 另外一个就是在正文中提到我的paper的时候,还特别强调了”In his study, Dr. xx
: and his PhD research supervisor, Dr. xxx, developed ...". 我觉得这样子就更加
: weaken我的case了。
: 不管怎样,我还是会follow律师的意见,但是我很想知道其他有经验的人的看法。多谢
: 了。

avatar
a*t
8
你孩子上幼儿园多久了?看起来还不太信任老师。也许时间长了,跟老师熟了会好些。
要不就换幼儿园吧。小孩子通常不会掩饰自己,表现太异常的话,很多时候就是幼儿园
/老师不够好。
avatar
c*e
9
我也觉得你律师的建议有道理。虽然第二个说法可以改进下。但是目的还是挺对的。我
当时没强调PhD的工作,也没用之前老板的推荐信。就被RFE了三年研究经历。后来要了
PhD老板的推荐信来证明了下。

xx

【在 K******g 的大作中提到】
: 公司律师说我刚毕业不久(1年半),必须证明我读phd期间三年的research经验。所以
: 就说RL from my PhD advisor is required.并且在一封独立人的推荐信里,特地在第
: 一段话中突出我的outstanding contributions 是“during his graduate study at
: University of xxx." 请问这样子好吗?我总感觉这样子会weaken这个testimonial的
: 作用
: 另外一个就是在正文中提到我的paper的时候,还特别强调了”In his study, Dr. xx
: and his PhD research supervisor, Dr. xxx, developed ...". 我觉得这样子就更加
: weaken我的case了。
: 不管怎样,我还是会follow律师的意见,但是我很想知道其他有经验的人的看法。多谢
: 了。

avatar
l*o
10
Exactly, there's no trust or bonding built.
He has been in this daycare for 4 months, he has been asking me to take him
to previous family care for the first month. But I thought he might just
need more time to adapt.
From the teacher's view, "he is always happy." I know my child, that's not
true. He is used to whine at home, but hold his emotion at school. I think
he needs to learn to express feelings to teacher, maybe some videos could
help?
avatar
e*r
11
完全同意,尤其第二条

that
done
at

【在 T*******y 的大作中提到】
: Your lawyer's right, you need to include your Ph.D. experience as your
: outstanding research experience.
: The first sentence seems fine.
: In the second sentence, it's specified that you and your advisor did the
: work, and it sounds a bit unnecessary. You can just say that "Dr. xx's
: research in yyy has influenced zzz", and it can be mentioned elsewhere that
: the research in yyy is your Ph.D. work, but the fact that this work was done
: during your Ph.D. needs not to be specified clearly everywhere.
:
: 以就说RL from my PhD advisor is required.并且在一封独立人的推荐信里,特地在

avatar
a*t
12
其实不是技巧的问题啊,如果他在家都能表达,没道理到了学校就不会了。还是跟老师
bonding不够。小小孩很看重这个,我们家的曾经因升班,找不到喜欢的老师了,就拒
绝去幼儿园,后来换了个幼儿园,有他喜欢的新老师,一下就好了。
avatar
K*g
13
不会觉得把我的advisor带上会觉得weaken我的case吗?尤其是那篇文章是我的advisor
的第一作者,我是第二作者。

【在 e******r 的大作中提到】
: 完全同意,尤其第二条
:
: that
: done
: at

avatar
K*g
14
那是一篇文章,老板是第一作者我是第二作者,但是我觉得提到我老板会很大的weaken
我的case。

that
done
at

【在 T*******y 的大作中提到】
: Your lawyer's right, you need to include your Ph.D. experience as your
: outstanding research experience.
: The first sentence seems fine.
: In the second sentence, it's specified that you and your advisor did the
: work, and it sounds a bit unnecessary. You can just say that "Dr. xx's
: research in yyy has influenced zzz", and it can be mentioned elsewhere that
: the research in yyy is your Ph.D. work, but the fact that this work was done
: during your Ph.D. needs not to be specified clearly everywhere.
:
: 以就说RL from my PhD advisor is required.并且在一封独立人的推荐信里,特地在

avatar
T*y
15
二作 is good to use, and you don't need to specify this all the time. Just
say your paper xxx or your work in yyy has this or that usage.
"我觉得提到我老板会很大的weaken我的case" yes, if this is mentioned
everywhere, it didn't sound good to me. But you should still mention your
research experience during Ph.D. in ONE or TWO places, as you do need to
show that you have at least 3 years of OUTSTANDING research experience. And
then use "Dr. KingMing's work" in other places.

weaken我的case。

【在 K******g 的大作中提到】
: 那是一篇文章,老板是第一作者我是第二作者,但是我觉得提到我老板会很大的weaken
: 我的case。
:
: that
: done
: at

相关阅读
logo
联系我们隐私协议©2024 redian.news
Redian新闻
Redian.news刊载任何文章,不代表同意其说法或描述,仅为提供更多信息,也不构成任何建议。文章信息的合法性及真实性由其作者负责,与Redian.news及其运营公司无关。欢迎投稿,如发现稿件侵权,或作者不愿在本网发表文章,请版权拥有者通知本网处理。