c*r
2 楼
没意义吧?
f*n
3 楼
也想同问这个问题。从皮匠的博客上看,这两个同时申请好像不好。但是也没看到别的
地方有说。不知道到底是不是这么回事。
http://blog.wenxuecity.com/myblog/14332/200801/6775.html
如果你同时申请 EB-1a 和 EB-1b,那没有什么关系,没有任何的冲突。
倘若你申请 NIW 之后又申请 PERM (EB-2/3),那么移民局拒了你的 NIW,似乎是顺理
成章的。为什么?既然你能够、而且在申请 PERM,那么就说明你不是一定需要 NIW 的
。
【在 r****m 的大作中提到】
![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: 一直有印象NIW 和PERM 好像不能同时申请,但是昨天有律师说不是这样,确实是弄糊
: 涂了,有人知道到底咋回事吗?
k*e
4 楼
个人认为是有冲突的,因为申请NIW的时候,你要解释为什么给你申请劳工卡(也就是这
里所说的PERM)会损害国家利益。
里所说的PERM)会损害国家利益。
f*D
8 楼
This info is the leading info from this board and pijiang.
If you do some research, you will figure out soon.
Please stop misleading people!
If you do some research, you will figure out soon.
Please stop misleading people!
k*e
10 楼
here comes the research:
"Aliens seeking a national interest waiver are requesting that the Labor Certification be waived because it is in the interest of the United States. " quoted from USCIS website below.I hope the one who requests others to do research do his/her own research first!!!!
Source: http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.eb1d4c2a3e5b9ac89243c6a7543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=816a83453d4a3210VgnVCM100000b92ca60aRCRD&vgnextchannel=816a83453d4a3210VgnVCM100000b92ca60aRCRD
Below is another research result.This is still from USCIS website http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=93da6b814ba81310VgnVCM100000082ca60aRCRD&vgnextchannel=6abe6d26d17df110VgnVCM1000004718190aRCRD. please pay attention to the third point.
Q15. What are the three prongs laid out in the NYSDOT decision?
A15.
1. The waiver applicant must seek employment in an area that has substantial intrinsic merit.
2. The waiver applicant must demonstrate that the proposed benefit to be provided will be national in scope.
3. The waiver applicant must demonstrate that it would be contrary to the national interest to potentially deprive the prospective employer of the services of the waiver applicant by making available to U.S. workers the position sought by the waiver applicant.
Stated another way, the petitioner, whether the U.S. employer or the NIW applicant, must establish that the entrepreneur will serve the national interest to a substantially greater degree than would an available U.S. worker having the same minimum qualifications.
"Aliens seeking a national interest waiver are requesting that the Labor Certification be waived because it is in the interest of the United States. " quoted from USCIS website below.I hope the one who requests others to do research do his/her own research first!!!!
Source: http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.eb1d4c2a3e5b9ac89243c6a7543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=816a83453d4a3210VgnVCM100000b92ca60aRCRD&vgnextchannel=816a83453d4a3210VgnVCM100000b92ca60aRCRD
Below is another research result.This is still from USCIS website http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=93da6b814ba81310VgnVCM100000082ca60aRCRD&vgnextchannel=6abe6d26d17df110VgnVCM1000004718190aRCRD. please pay attention to the third point.
Q15. What are the three prongs laid out in the NYSDOT decision?
A15.
1. The waiver applicant must seek employment in an area that has substantial intrinsic merit.
2. The waiver applicant must demonstrate that the proposed benefit to be provided will be national in scope.
3. The waiver applicant must demonstrate that it would be contrary to the national interest to potentially deprive the prospective employer of the services of the waiver applicant by making available to U.S. workers the position sought by the waiver applicant.
Stated another way, the petitioner, whether the U.S. employer or the NIW applicant, must establish that the entrepreneur will serve the national interest to a substantially greater degree than would an available U.S. worker having the same minimum qualifications.
b*e
11 楼
//pat pat, calm calm :)
Certification be waived because it is in the interest of the United States.
" quoted from USCIS website below.I hope the one who requests other to do
research do his/her own res
【在 k******e 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: here comes the research:
: "Aliens seeking a national interest waiver are requesting that the Labor Certification be waived because it is in the interest of the United States. " quoted from USCIS website below.I hope the one who requests others to do research do his/her own research first!!!!
: Source: http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.eb1d4c2a3e5b9ac89243c6a7543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=816a83453d4a3210VgnVCM100000b92ca60aRCRD&vgnextchannel=816a83453d4a3210VgnVCM100000b92ca60aRCRD
: Below is another research result.This is still from USCIS website http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=93da6b814ba81310VgnVCM100000082ca60aRCRD&vgnextchannel=6abe6d26d17df110VgnVCM1000004718190aRCRD. please pay attention to the third point.
: Q15. What are the three prongs laid out in the NYSDOT decision?
: A15.
: 1. The waiver applicant must seek employment in an area that has substantial intrinsic merit.
: 2. The waiver applicant must demonstrate that the proposed benefit to be provided will be national in scope.
: 3. The waiver applicant must demonstrate that it would be contrary to the national interest to potentially deprive the prospective employer of the services of the waiver applicant by making available to U.S. workers the position sought by the waiver applicant.
: Stated another way, the petitioner, whether the U.S. employer or the NIW applicant, must establish that the entrepreneur will serve the national interest to a substantially greater degree than would an available U.S. worker having the same minimum qualifications.
Certification be waived because it is in the interest of the United States.
" quoted from USCIS website below.I hope the one who requests other to do
research do his/her own res
【在 k******e 的大作中提到】
![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: here comes the research:
: "Aliens seeking a national interest waiver are requesting that the Labor Certification be waived because it is in the interest of the United States. " quoted from USCIS website below.I hope the one who requests others to do research do his/her own research first!!!!
: Source: http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.eb1d4c2a3e5b9ac89243c6a7543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=816a83453d4a3210VgnVCM100000b92ca60aRCRD&vgnextchannel=816a83453d4a3210VgnVCM100000b92ca60aRCRD
: Below is another research result.This is still from USCIS website http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=93da6b814ba81310VgnVCM100000082ca60aRCRD&vgnextchannel=6abe6d26d17df110VgnVCM1000004718190aRCRD. please pay attention to the third point.
: Q15. What are the three prongs laid out in the NYSDOT decision?
: A15.
: 1. The waiver applicant must seek employment in an area that has substantial intrinsic merit.
: 2. The waiver applicant must demonstrate that the proposed benefit to be provided will be national in scope.
: 3. The waiver applicant must demonstrate that it would be contrary to the national interest to potentially deprive the prospective employer of the services of the waiver applicant by making available to U.S. workers the position sought by the waiver applicant.
: Stated another way, the petitioner, whether the U.S. employer or the NIW applicant, must establish that the entrepreneur will serve the national interest to a substantially greater degree than would an available U.S. worker having the same minimum qualifications.
k*e
15 楼
no matter which one is file first, how can you proof that the third point in
my research above? perm and niw is sure contradictory to each other.
someone might be lucky does not mean it can be applied to others. for
example, someone may still get his or her gc approved after he/she use an F1
visa to come back to US while his/her 485 is pending. but we know that
should not be encouraged and doing so will jeopardize one's gc application
in theory.
【在 b*******e 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: 应该这么理解,如果PERM在前,NIW在后,我觉得没啥大不了的。移民局多收点钱,不
: 会太在意。如果NIW在前,PERM在后,这可能就有个逻辑问题在里面,呵呵。
my research above? perm and niw is sure contradictory to each other.
someone might be lucky does not mean it can be applied to others. for
example, someone may still get his or her gc approved after he/she use an F1
visa to come back to US while his/her 485 is pending. but we know that
should not be encouraged and doing so will jeopardize one's gc application
in theory.
【在 b*******e 的大作中提到】
![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: 应该这么理解,如果PERM在前,NIW在后,我觉得没啥大不了的。移民局多收点钱,不
: 会太在意。如果NIW在前,PERM在后,这可能就有个逻辑问题在里面,呵呵。
b*e
16 楼
恩,不应该做这种事情,呵呵
最好得办法就是走Schedule A .
in
F1
【在 k******e 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: no matter which one is file first, how can you proof that the third point in
: my research above? perm and niw is sure contradictory to each other.
: someone might be lucky does not mean it can be applied to others. for
: example, someone may still get his or her gc approved after he/she use an F1
: visa to come back to US while his/her 485 is pending. but we know that
: should not be encouraged and doing so will jeopardize one's gc application
: in theory.
最好得办法就是走Schedule A .
in
F1
【在 k******e 的大作中提到】
![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: no matter which one is file first, how can you proof that the third point in
: my research above? perm and niw is sure contradictory to each other.
: someone might be lucky does not mean it can be applied to others. for
: example, someone may still get his or her gc approved after he/she use an F1
: visa to come back to US while his/her 485 is pending. but we know that
: should not be encouraged and doing so will jeopardize one's gc application
: in theory.
f*D
19 楼
u r wrong.
That's it.
in
F1
【在 k******e 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: no matter which one is file first, how can you proof that the third point in
: my research above? perm and niw is sure contradictory to each other.
: someone might be lucky does not mean it can be applied to others. for
: example, someone may still get his or her gc approved after he/she use an F1
: visa to come back to US while his/her 485 is pending. but we know that
: should not be encouraged and doing so will jeopardize one's gc application
: in theory.
That's it.
in
F1
【在 k******e 的大作中提到】
![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: no matter which one is file first, how can you proof that the third point in
: my research above? perm and niw is sure contradictory to each other.
: someone might be lucky does not mean it can be applied to others. for
: example, someone may still get his or her gc approved after he/she use an F1
: visa to come back to US while his/her 485 is pending. but we know that
: should not be encouraged and doing so will jeopardize one's gc application
: in theory.
f*D
26 楼
sorry.
I didn't mean it is your fault. The misleading info doesn't start from
you.
I am guessing it is started from pijiang, even he corrected his words
later,
but still didn't admit his fault.
Sorry again.
Hope you can stop spreading the wrong info.
anyway, who cares~~
None of my business~~
【在 k******e 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: stop telling me what to do!
: who cares about what you love?
I didn't mean it is your fault. The misleading info doesn't start from
you.
I am guessing it is started from pijiang, even he corrected his words
later,
but still didn't admit his fault.
Sorry again.
Hope you can stop spreading the wrong info.
anyway, who cares~~
None of my business~~
【在 k******e 的大作中提到】
![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: stop telling me what to do!
: who cares about what you love?
k*e
27 楼
u don't need to say sorry. i believe everyone has his/her own judgement
whether this info is correct or not after his/her research, just like
elsevier mentioned above.
【在 f****D 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: sorry.
: I didn't mean it is your fault. The misleading info doesn't start from
: you.
: I am guessing it is started from pijiang, even he corrected his words
: later,
: but still didn't admit his fault.
: Sorry again.
: Hope you can stop spreading the wrong info.
: anyway, who cares~~
: None of my business~~
whether this info is correct or not after his/her research, just like
elsevier mentioned above.
【在 f****D 的大作中提到】
![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: sorry.
: I didn't mean it is your fault. The misleading info doesn't start from
: you.
: I am guessing it is started from pijiang, even he corrected his words
: later,
: but still didn't admit his fault.
: Sorry again.
: Hope you can stop spreading the wrong info.
: anyway, who cares~~
: None of my business~~
l*t
28 楼
fishid 不要着急
谢谢你的澄清
大伙儿办绿卡心里都比较不稳当,多担待
【在 f****D 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: sorry.
: I didn't mean it is your fault. The misleading info doesn't start from
: you.
: I am guessing it is started from pijiang, even he corrected his words
: later,
: but still didn't admit his fault.
: Sorry again.
: Hope you can stop spreading the wrong info.
: anyway, who cares~~
: None of my business~~
谢谢你的澄清
大伙儿办绿卡心里都比较不稳当,多担待
【在 f****D 的大作中提到】
![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: sorry.
: I didn't mean it is your fault. The misleading info doesn't start from
: you.
: I am guessing it is started from pijiang, even he corrected his words
: later,
: but still didn't admit his fault.
: Sorry again.
: Hope you can stop spreading the wrong info.
: anyway, who cares~~
: None of my business~~
相关阅读
急问: I-140申请属于哪个辖区?请教EB1a的几个问题conc filing好像确实是要快一点没有impact factor 的 review能claim吗?去年11月的485还有没批的吗,对TSC无语了file 140后换工作导致center变化要紧吗?报告一个tsc485的进度h1b即将过期,请大家支招——要J1还是自己上弱eb1a。请问递交了1-140换身份成F2会受影响吗?保留中国护照问题紧急求助:485问题140被RFE了,IO咬住我的citation不放审稿机会 代谢方面 有人要吗入职前可以申请EB1B吗?呆在国内H1B问题 (转载)报绿 485 TSC RD 1/31 after RFE 附TimelineEB1A TSC PP Approved with TimelineEAD 和FP 有关系吗?EB1A今天file了,诚心求祝福求购:EB1A或NIW 环境或生态方向的推荐信