收到第一封主编推荐信，不是很爽。不知道能不能用# Immigration - 落地生根
a*t
1 楼
不错的杂志，为其审了１２篇稿。两周前联系主编要推荐信，说明了推荐信要 ＇to
recommend the high quality and world influence of the journal, to explain
the selection of reviewers, and the significance and contribution of my
reviewing works＇。 同时表明可以提供DRAFT。
没有回信.
今天突然来了正式的推荐信，看了后很是不清楚, 推荐的语气实在是太弱了。请大家看
看能不能用，如果不能用，就再厚脸皮要求他再改改或者自己改了再要求他从新签字。
多谢
Dear Sir,
As editor-in-chief for the XXX journal, I verify that Dr. YYY has served as
an Expert Reviewer of original manuscripts submitted by other scientists for
publication in this journal. Dr. YYY is an expert in the field of xxx, and
particularly in zzz, such as sss and jjj. His scientific opinions have
assisted associate editor 1, associate editor 2, and me with decisions
regarding the suitability of 12 manuscripts for publication in XXX journal
since 2009.
Published by the ACS, the XXX journal is a peer-reviewed international
research journal and publishes high-quality, cutting edge original research
representing complete studies and research advances deal with the chemistry
and biochemistry. XXX also encourages papers with chemistry and/or
biochemistry as a major component combined with biological/sensor/
nutritional/toxicological evaluation related to xxx and sss fields. The
journal began in1953 and currently publishes 51 issues annually. According
the 2011 Thomson Reuters, out of 57 journals in xxx category, the XXX
journal is the most cited journal with 33333 total citations, and most
articles published with 1111 articles. The XXX journal is also ranked #1 in
total citations in the so-and-so categories.
Reviewers for XXX journal include experts from across the globe. We select
reviewers from a database of authors and reviewers who have specific
expertise in the areas covered by our journal. We also invite reviewers
according to their scientific expertise as illustrated by their peer
reviewed publications, citation of their work by the manuscript author, or
at the suggestion of a scientist who knows them to be a reputable colleague
able to render and expert opinion. Reviewing requires state-of-the-art
expertise in the specific scientific area of the manuscript, and an in-depth
knowledge of past work in the field.
I appreciate Dr. YYY’s considerable contribution of time and expertise to
the review process, and will call upon him to review manuscripts again in
the future.
recommend the high quality and world influence of the journal, to explain
the selection of reviewers, and the significance and contribution of my
reviewing works＇。 同时表明可以提供DRAFT。
没有回信.
今天突然来了正式的推荐信，看了后很是不清楚, 推荐的语气实在是太弱了。请大家看
看能不能用，如果不能用，就再厚脸皮要求他再改改或者自己改了再要求他从新签字。
多谢
Dear Sir,
As editor-in-chief for the XXX journal, I verify that Dr. YYY has served as
an Expert Reviewer of original manuscripts submitted by other scientists for
publication in this journal. Dr. YYY is an expert in the field of xxx, and
particularly in zzz, such as sss and jjj. His scientific opinions have
assisted associate editor 1, associate editor 2, and me with decisions
regarding the suitability of 12 manuscripts for publication in XXX journal
since 2009.
Published by the ACS, the XXX journal is a peer-reviewed international
research journal and publishes high-quality, cutting edge original research
representing complete studies and research advances deal with the chemistry
and biochemistry. XXX also encourages papers with chemistry and/or
biochemistry as a major component combined with biological/sensor/
nutritional/toxicological evaluation related to xxx and sss fields. The
journal began in1953 and currently publishes 51 issues annually. According
the 2011 Thomson Reuters, out of 57 journals in xxx category, the XXX
journal is the most cited journal with 33333 total citations, and most
articles published with 1111 articles. The XXX journal is also ranked #1 in
total citations in the so-and-so categories.
Reviewers for XXX journal include experts from across the globe. We select
reviewers from a database of authors and reviewers who have specific
expertise in the areas covered by our journal. We also invite reviewers
according to their scientific expertise as illustrated by their peer
reviewed publications, citation of their work by the manuscript author, or
at the suggestion of a scientist who knows them to be a reputable colleague
able to render and expert opinion. Reviewing requires state-of-the-art
expertise in the specific scientific area of the manuscript, and an in-depth
knowledge of past work in the field.
I appreciate Dr. YYY’s considerable contribution of time and expertise to
the review process, and will call upon him to review manuscripts again in
the future.
