TSC---EB1a PP 来RFE了，求助！！！（附详细背景）# Immigration - 落地生根
z*i
1 楼
TSC
背景比较平淡，没有突出可以震住IO的，
美国化工博士（０５－０９），化学博士后（１０－ｎｏｗ），偏材料。7月初递交
I140，7月27 日收到pp，8月9日收到
RFE
推荐信5封：2封来自2个老板，3封来自独立：一个美国（报道我年初发表的文章写
perspective的教授人很nice还给我发模版）一个土耳其，还有个中国现在德国访问）
paper：12 篇：7篇英文一作（其中2片IF9.0以上， 包括JACS，另一片被同期
perspective报道； 其他2片4.0 以上，以及2-4之间的， 都发表于０８年以后），2
片中文一作，3篇英文
coauthor（一片JACS,一片chem Comm，还有2点多的小杂志）
citation: 106 times （不理想，第一作的最好的是08年发的有28次）中文文章有１０
多个，没算
Review: 38 次加8次revision 12个journals（IF2-10之间都有，IF〉2 （10次），IF
〉9 （4次）， IF〉5 （7次），IF〉3 （7次）
递交140并pp（一个月后）
又有一片IF10以上文章发表，并参加一个conference，
review次数加到46次（加11次revision）
citation:增加3次 其中有篇nature报道引用，评论一小段，还不错。
USCIS 认可了authorship. 对review有疑问：主要是editor发邀请的时候用了我的
nickname（注册的时候随手填的，后悔）后来一直用nickname邀请。IO对此有疑问。这
个问题不是太大。可以讲杂志上profile打出来，如果可能的话请主编写的推荐信。
比较大头的问题是不承认国际或全国影响力：
USCIS has carefully reviewed the letters of support submitted on your behalf
and clearly your research has helped the field. However, much of your
research as described by your letters support indicate your research has led
to incremental breakthroughs, but it has not lead to a major significant
discovery. This criterion has not been met because the evidence submitted
does not show that your contributions are considered to be of major
significance to the field of endeavor. Many of the letters of support were
from individuals who already knew you, and the letters of support were
general in nature, and did not establish your accomplishments are any
greater than your peers.USCIS recognizes your original research discoveries;
however, USCIS does not find the totality of your work has risen to a major
significance within your field. Given your low publication rate, and
moderate citation record it has not been established your work has made a
major significant impact within your field. USCIS does recognize the patent
that you have received; however aside from this discovery your work as a
whole does rise to a major significant impact. Conducting research and
discovering incremental breakthroughs is inherent to the position in which
your serve in, and based on the evidence your work has not made a major
significant impact. To assist in determining whether of your contributions
are original and of major significance, you may submit:
Objective documentary evidence of the significance of your contribution to
the field;
Evidence of your work being implemented by others. Possible evidence may
include but is not limited to:
Contracts with companies using of your products;
Licensed technology being used by others;
Any other relevant evidence.
关键是PL中没有突出的top percentage。律师就列了发的杂志是top。
还说low publication rate.这个怎么办？ 还有moderate citation record？
恳请大牛，小牛，所有有经验的好心人出出主意。谢谢！！！
背景比较平淡，没有突出可以震住IO的，
美国化工博士（０５－０９），化学博士后（１０－ｎｏｗ），偏材料。7月初递交
I140，7月27 日收到pp，8月9日收到
RFE
推荐信5封：2封来自2个老板，3封来自独立：一个美国（报道我年初发表的文章写
perspective的教授人很nice还给我发模版）一个土耳其，还有个中国现在德国访问）
paper：12 篇：7篇英文一作（其中2片IF9.0以上， 包括JACS，另一片被同期
perspective报道； 其他2片4.0 以上，以及2-4之间的， 都发表于０８年以后），2
片中文一作，3篇英文
coauthor（一片JACS,一片chem Comm，还有2点多的小杂志）
citation: 106 times （不理想，第一作的最好的是08年发的有28次）中文文章有１０
多个，没算
Review: 38 次加8次revision 12个journals（IF2-10之间都有，IF〉2 （10次），IF
〉9 （4次）， IF〉5 （7次），IF〉3 （7次）
递交140并pp（一个月后）
又有一片IF10以上文章发表，并参加一个conference，
review次数加到46次（加11次revision）
citation:增加3次 其中有篇nature报道引用，评论一小段，还不错。
USCIS 认可了authorship. 对review有疑问：主要是editor发邀请的时候用了我的
nickname（注册的时候随手填的，后悔）后来一直用nickname邀请。IO对此有疑问。这
个问题不是太大。可以讲杂志上profile打出来，如果可能的话请主编写的推荐信。
比较大头的问题是不承认国际或全国影响力：
USCIS has carefully reviewed the letters of support submitted on your behalf
and clearly your research has helped the field. However, much of your
research as described by your letters support indicate your research has led
to incremental breakthroughs, but it has not lead to a major significant
discovery. This criterion has not been met because the evidence submitted
does not show that your contributions are considered to be of major
significance to the field of endeavor. Many of the letters of support were
from individuals who already knew you, and the letters of support were
general in nature, and did not establish your accomplishments are any
greater than your peers.USCIS recognizes your original research discoveries;
however, USCIS does not find the totality of your work has risen to a major
significance within your field. Given your low publication rate, and
moderate citation record it has not been established your work has made a
major significant impact within your field. USCIS does recognize the patent
that you have received; however aside from this discovery your work as a
whole does rise to a major significant impact. Conducting research and
discovering incremental breakthroughs is inherent to the position in which
your serve in, and based on the evidence your work has not made a major
significant impact. To assist in determining whether of your contributions
are original and of major significance, you may submit:
Objective documentary evidence of the significance of your contribution to
the field;
Evidence of your work being implemented by others. Possible evidence may
include but is not limited to:
Contracts with companies using of your products;
Licensed technology being used by others;
Any other relevant evidence.
关键是PL中没有突出的top percentage。律师就列了发的杂志是top。
还说low publication rate.这个怎么办？ 还有moderate citation record？
恳请大牛，小牛，所有有经验的好心人出出主意。谢谢！！！
