My strategy to response the RFE. Please comments!# Immigration - 落地生根
D*Y
1 楼
The IO admitted authority and review. Here is my plan to response the RFE
for contribution. Thanks for the information provided by MITBBS. I hope my
post could help the others too.
Suggestions and comments are appreciated.
1. lack geographic information for citations and letters didn't address how
my work affect the specific authors.
response:
1. the map of authors' distribution
2. tables about the top 20 countries and institutions that have cited my
work.
3. highlight the comments from the recommendation letters about how my work
influenced their study. (I requested for two extra recommendation letters
from original references)
4. list of top 20 authors who cited my work and list the comments
I also provided extra citations from goole scholar
summary
2. My work should attract national or international attention
response:
1. re-emphasize response to question1
2. detail my most recent published paper with referee report along with
editor letter
3. detail my paper published as rapid communication with the introduction of
rapid communication
4. detail my two papers highlighted as editor's suggestion along with an
estimation about how difficult to be selected as editor's suggestion and
cite a recommendation letters' statement, in which the professor said he had
only one editor's suggestion in his career while I had 2 in 18 months
5. list the papers and journal I reviewed and list the citations of the
papers I reviewed.
6. list the comments from references
summary
3. small percentage
response:
1.re-emphasize responses to questions 1 and 2
2. publications and citations compared to top school faculty statistics
3. citations compared to filed average
4. citations compared to the top percentage
5. show the authors who cited my work and the comments on my work to
demonstrate my work's quality
6.the recommendation letter comments
summary
4. sustained acclaim
response;
1. re-emphasize the responses to questions 1, 2 and 3
2. show the chart for publications across years
3. show the chart for citations across years
4. recommendation letters
Summary
for contribution. Thanks for the information provided by MITBBS. I hope my
post could help the others too.
Suggestions and comments are appreciated.
1. lack geographic information for citations and letters didn't address how
my work affect the specific authors.
response:
1. the map of authors' distribution
2. tables about the top 20 countries and institutions that have cited my
work.
3. highlight the comments from the recommendation letters about how my work
influenced their study. (I requested for two extra recommendation letters
from original references)
4. list of top 20 authors who cited my work and list the comments
I also provided extra citations from goole scholar
summary
2. My work should attract national or international attention
response:
1. re-emphasize response to question1
2. detail my most recent published paper with referee report along with
editor letter
3. detail my paper published as rapid communication with the introduction of
rapid communication
4. detail my two papers highlighted as editor's suggestion along with an
estimation about how difficult to be selected as editor's suggestion and
cite a recommendation letters' statement, in which the professor said he had
only one editor's suggestion in his career while I had 2 in 18 months
5. list the papers and journal I reviewed and list the citations of the
papers I reviewed.
6. list the comments from references
summary
3. small percentage
response:
1.re-emphasize responses to questions 1 and 2
2. publications and citations compared to top school faculty statistics
3. citations compared to filed average
4. citations compared to the top percentage
5. show the authors who cited my work and the comments on my work to
demonstrate my work's quality
6.the recommendation letter comments
summary
4. sustained acclaim
response;
1. re-emphasize the responses to questions 1, 2 and 3
2. show the chart for publications across years
3. show the chart for citations across years
4. recommendation letters
Summary
