Redian新闻
>
Eb1A是不是非得跟这个表比比啊?谁能举个例子说说表中数字的意思啊!
avatar
Eb1A是不是非得跟这个表比比啊?谁能举个例子说说表中数字的意思啊!# Immigration - 落地生根
d*m
1
2002-2012不同领域文章被引用的百分比表格
https://docs.google.com/open?id=0Bx5hZSp3Il-2NWdhQ3l6bTd6Sm8
2002-2012不同领域文章平均引用率
https://docs.google.com/open?id=0Bx5hZSp3Il-2dDd4QldCR2hNTEU
2002-2012不同领域文章发表总数和被引用总数和平均引用次数
https://docs.google.com/open?id=0Bx5hZSp3Il-2bmlYNnF2UFpYRUk
看了这些表半天没看懂。
avatar
s*x
2
怎么传图啊?我有个图片可以说明
或者你自己点网站进去看吧
引用Top Percentiles Page 的阅读方法
http://essentialscience.com/help/h3pertab.htm
是单单每一篇文章的引用量
avatar
s*x
3
To read this table:
The Percentiles page is divided into sections for each individual scientific
field, with the "All Fields" section combining all data. Within each
section are rows for the four percentile breakdowns (0.01%, 0.1%, 1%, and 10
%). Data for the percentiles are given for the last 10 years, with the "All
Years" column using all data for those years.
See the picture above. In the Chemistry portion of the table, a value of 66,
for instance, in the 0.01% column for 1998 indicates that the top 0.01% of
papers in chemistry journals in that year have since been cited a minimum of
66 times.
avatar
d*m
4
明白了。
例如:
In the Chemistry portion of the table, a value of 66, for instance, in the 0
.01% column for 1998 indicates that the top 0.01% of papers in chemistry
journals in that year have since been cited a minimum of 66 times.
thanks!
avatar
s*u
5
不是必须的,只是模板里面大家都比较了
我也比了
PL没有固定格式的。
avatar
s*x
6
To read this table:
The Percentiles page is divided into sections for each individual scientific
field, with the "All Fields" section combining all data. Within each
section are rows for the four percentile breakdowns (0.01%, 0.1%, 1%, and 10
%). Data for the percentiles are given for the last 10 years, with the "All
Years" column using all data for those years.
See the picture above. In the Chemistry portion of the table, a value of 66,
for instance, in the 0.01% column for 1998 indicates that the top 0.01% of
papers in chemistry journals in that year have since been cited a minimum of
66 times.
avatar
d*m
7
我觉得比这玩意有潜在的危险,比如你一共20篇paper,并挑明其中的3篇<10%,这岂不
反证其它17篇引用很低>10%?大家认为如何?
avatar
f*s
8
10%就可以了吗?我怎么觉得版上都是1%,0.1%之类的

【在 d****m 的大作中提到】
: 我觉得比这玩意有潜在的危险,比如你一共20篇paper,并挑明其中的3篇<10%,这岂不
: 反证其它17篇引用很低>10%?大家认为如何?

avatar
g*n
9
没必要比吧?我看很多人都没有去跟这个表比,你可以好好考考古,看看别人是怎么把
自己的paper搞到top 1%的。
avatar
d*m
10
我看还是算了吧,牛人才用这种表。
avatar
W*i
11
这个表对一般的小牛都没有太大意义阿。
相关阅读
logo
联系我们隐私协议©2024 redian.news
Redian新闻
Redian.news刊载任何文章,不代表同意其说法或描述,仅为提供更多信息,也不构成任何建议。文章信息的合法性及真实性由其作者负责,与Redian.news及其运营公司无关。欢迎投稿,如发现稿件侵权,或作者不愿在本网发表文章,请版权拥有者通知本网处理。