Evidence does not Establish that the Original Scientific, Scholarly,
Artistic, Athletic, or Businessrelated Contributions are of Major
Significance
This criterion has not been met because the evidence submitted does not show
that the beneficiary’s
contributions are considered to be of major significance to the field of
endeavor. To assist in
determining whether the beneficiary’s contributions are original and of
major significance, you may
submit:
• Objective documentary evidence of the significance of the
beneficiary’s contribution
to the field.
• Documentary evidence that people throughout the field currently
consider the
beneficiary’s work important.
• Testimony and/or support letters from experts which discuss the
beneficiary’s
contributions of major significance.
• Evidence that the beneficiary’s major significant contribution(s)
has provoked
widespread public commentary in the field or has been widely cited.
• Evidence of the beneficiary’s work being implemented by others.
Possible evidence
may include but is not limited to:
o Contracts with companies using the beneficiary’s products;
o Licensed technology being used by others;
o Patents currently being utilized and shown to be significant to the field.
• The above are examples of evidence you may submit to support your
petition and are not
all inclusive. You may submit any other relevant evidence which demonstrates
you meet
the criterion.
Note: Letters and testimonies, if submitted, must provide as much detail as
possible about the
beneficiary’s contribution and must explain, in detail, how the
contribution was “original” (not
merely replicating the work of others) and how they were of “major”
significance. General
statements regarding the importance of the endeavors are insufficient.
这是ＵＳＣＩＳ官方ＲＦＥ的模板，注意最后一段话。光吹不行，一定要detail，具体
地再举事实，证明你的贡献是原创的，你是世界第一个做这的，开创了这个field（当
然要多用限定词，总能找到你是第一，至少是pioneering的）。然后，就要独立推荐人
举事实了，具体点，不要怕用专业词汇，适当用点可能更能唬住ＩＯ。他们是怎么样从
你这得到启发的，怎么应用你的发现，并且有了怎么样的重大的结果。
不好意思，上面是我的理解，我本人也没有回复过ＲＦＥ。都是我在写我自己材料的时
候的感想。
ＢＬＥＳＳ
