用ResearcherID还是google作油灯图 - 未名空间MITBBS历史存档

国际科技财经博客移民网络热点娱乐民生时事公众号

Redian新闻

>未名空间

>Immigration - 落地生根

用ResearcherID还是google作油灯图

用ResearcherID还是google作油灯图# Immigration - 落地生根

S*y2013-03-07 08:03

1 楼

ResearcherID的引用漏的太多，只有150。google上却有200+。用google作油灯图太麻
烦，大伙看看ResearcherID的图够不够用？谢谢

t*m2013-03-07 08:03

2 楼

看起来挺好的。R是reprint吗？

k*g2013-03-07 08:03

3 楼

看起来很好！

S*n2013-03-07 08:03

4 楼

it's better to use objective evidence, not subjective.
acutally in many cases, you don't have to spend too much time on that. paper
and citiations and small percentage are the real thingings we should dig
gl

ResearcherID的引用漏的太多，只有150。google上却有200+。用google作油灯图太麻
烦，大伙看看ResearcherID的图够不够用？谢谢

【在 S********y 的大作中提到】

: ResearcherID的引用漏的太多，只有150。google上却有200+。用google作油灯图太麻
: 烦，大伙看看ResearcherID的图够不够用？谢谢

R*u2013-03-07 08:03

5 楼

Thanks

paper

【在 S*********n 的大作中提到】

: it's better to use objective evidence, not subjective.
: acutally in many cases, you don't have to spend too much time on that. paper
: and citiations and small percentage are the real thingings we should dig
: gl
:
: ResearcherID的引用漏的太多，只有150。google上却有200+。用google作油灯图太麻
: 烦，大伙看看ResearcherID的图够不够用？谢谢