Review过 的 journal 是不是越多越好？# Immigration - 落地生根
s*u
1 楼
不是文章，而是journal. 比如说同样REview30篇文章，是不是8个journal比4个
journal好？
而且是不是最好有美国以外的？
journal好？
而且是不是最好有美国以外的？
g*4
2 楼
当然越多越好。感觉4个journal 与8个journal 没有太大区别。Journal档次感觉更重
要。几个小journal，加上1-2个好的最好。
要。几个小journal，加上1-2个好的最好。
I*M
3 楼
恩，档次重要。没听说跟journal的数量有关。一封editor的信应该比较重要。
【在 g*******4 的大作中提到】
: 当然越多越好。感觉4个journal 与8个journal 没有太大区别。Journal档次感觉更重
: 要。几个小journal，加上1-2个好的最好。
【在 g*******4 的大作中提到】
: 当然越多越好。感觉4个journal 与8个journal 没有太大区别。Journal档次感觉更重
: 要。几个小journal，加上1-2个好的最好。
p*r
4 楼
感觉种类和国别多点更好
s*u
5 楼
看来大家跟我一样也没有答案。不过我也觉得有欧洲的journal会好一些。也不知道整
不正确？
【在 p********r 的大作中提到】
: 感觉种类和国别多点更好
不正确？
【在 p********r 的大作中提到】
: 感觉种类和国别多点更好
s*u
6 楼
"received independent requests from a substantial number of journals;"
所以，Journal 越多越好的。
From AAO about review “peer review is routine in the field; not every peer
reviewer enjoys international recognition. Without evidence that sets the
beneficiary apart from others in his field, such as evidence that he has
reviewed manuscripts for a journal that credits a small, elite group of
referees; reviewed an unusually large number of articles; received
independent requests from a substantial number of journals; or served in an
editorial position for a distinguished journal, we cannot conclude that the
beneficiary meets this criterion.”
“peer review is routine in the field; not every peer review is indicative
of or consistent with international recognition on the part of the referee.”
所以，Journal 越多越好的。
From AAO about review “peer review is routine in the field; not every peer
reviewer enjoys international recognition. Without evidence that sets the
beneficiary apart from others in his field, such as evidence that he has
reviewed manuscripts for a journal that credits a small, elite group of
referees; reviewed an unusually large number of articles; received
independent requests from a substantial number of journals; or served in an
editorial position for a distinguished journal, we cannot conclude that the
beneficiary meets this criterion.”
“peer review is routine in the field; not every peer review is indicative
of or consistent with international recognition on the part of the referee.”
p*r
7 楼
老早以前就很仔细的研读过这段了。
所以，种类和国别越多越好，呵呵。
所以，种类和国别越多越好，呵呵。
相关阅读
求助：搬家后EAD被寄到旧地址去了 (转载)审稿机会, DFT 计算EAD 递上去不到一个月可以加急吗？问个弱弱的问题H1b receipt notice现在需要多久过去五年所有EB visa数据总结 (转载)问一个有H1b并拿AP回美国的问题EB1A 485期间换工作一个F1 I-485副申请人即将毕业找工作的问题485主副申请人进度差异很大,正常吗?收到卡了请教打指纹的问题USCIS 是按照case的number顺序处理还是随机？关于conference presentation 的证明NSC Eb1b弱case NOID，求助从本版毕业了， 今天收到卡 EB1AUpdate: Approved! NSC EB1A 追加PP 求祝福SR回复EB1B求评估 和 公司律师的questionnaire的问题经验分享：TSC EB1A DIY 生物背景，7篇文章，120引用，直接PP