NSC EB1B-140 RD NOID by 0214# Immigration - 落地生根
w*w
1 楼
RD 09/19/2014
看信件的日期是4/19/2015，奇怪USCIS周日也上班
今天收到邮件，网站上还是显示状态没有变化，还是accepted.
case比较弱，没敢PP，耐心等了7个月。同样的材料同日申请的NIW 3月份批了。
EE PHD，大学薄厚第四年，老板支持，申请时7篇文章（5 Journal, 2 Conference)，
review 70+， 由于做的都是偏实际应用，引用比较低就在PL中没提，被0214重点指出
要有引用，推荐人的信才有价值。
3 Depend+3 Independent
看来不是pp的case 0214也负责
Criteria Analysis老三样过了
USCIS has determined that the petitioner has provided sufficient
documentation to establish the
beneficiary has met the following regulatory criteria:
• Evidence of the alien's participation, either individually or on a
panel, as the judge of the work of others in the same or an allied academic
field
• Evidence of the alien's original scientific or scholarly research
contributions to the academic field
• Evidence of the alien's authorship of scholarly books or articles (
in scholarly journals with international circulation) in the academic field
奇怪的是没有claim prize/award, 只是在PL中提到自己参与了DOE支持的项目，竟然被
要求提供证明。
USCIS has determined that the petitioner provided documentation, but failed
to establish eligibility for the following criteria.
*Documentation of the alien's receipt of major prizes or awards for
outstanding achievement in the academic field.
Final Merits Analysis
The records shows that the alien has served as reviwer in his academic field
and on a TPC, but the evidence does not prove the alien's participation in
the widespread peer-reviewer process(a routine process...). Such acclaim is
more commonly associated with selection for service... (有封独立推荐信是来自
一位主编的，已经说了reviewer的选取是高标准的）
....Alien's scientific or scholarly research contributions to the academic
field must be demonstrated by the preexisting, independent, and objective
evidence. USCIS is ultimately responsible for making the final determination
of the alien's eligibility.
....USCIS considers the number of independent citations an objective,
reliable measurement in determining the alien's original contributions to
the academic field. Publishing alone may serve as evidence of originality,
but it is difficult to determine the published work's importance or
influence if there is little or no evidence that other researchers have
relied on the alien's finding. (引用太低，这部分是最头大的）
And so, upon examining the alien's citation history. USICS has determined
that this body of work demonstrates little influence on the field as whole.
Therefore, without further evidence establishing that the alien's work has
contributed significantly to the academic field, USCIS cannot conclude that
the alien is recognized internationally as an outstanding researcher. (申请
时没有提供citation数据，难道USCIS自己在网上查？）
Although the evidence of record shows that the alien meets the plain
language of 3 regulatory critera, he is not strong in any; moreover, the
evidence does not establish that the alien's original research has
contributed significantly to the field as a whole. You have proven that the
alien is a promising and highly-regarded researcher, having earned the
respect of this collaborators and employer while securing some degree of
international exposure for his work; but the records stops short of
elevating the alien to the level of one who is recognized internationally as
outstanding in the academic field.
As dicussed, USCIS has evaluated the evidence and determined that the
evidence does not establish that the beneficiary is an outstanding professor
or researcher in accordance with 203(b)(1(B)(i) of the INA.
比申请时现在又多3篇文章（非一作，第三篇是通信作者刚接收还没正式出版)，3月份
升成IEEE Senior Member，review估计多个10多个，还没具体数，又多一个会议的TPC
要求在5月21日前回复，非常感谢大家的建议和祝福
看信件的日期是4/19/2015，奇怪USCIS周日也上班
今天收到邮件，网站上还是显示状态没有变化，还是accepted.
case比较弱，没敢PP，耐心等了7个月。同样的材料同日申请的NIW 3月份批了。
EE PHD，大学薄厚第四年，老板支持，申请时7篇文章（5 Journal, 2 Conference)，
review 70+， 由于做的都是偏实际应用，引用比较低就在PL中没提，被0214重点指出
要有引用，推荐人的信才有价值。
3 Depend+3 Independent
看来不是pp的case 0214也负责
Criteria Analysis老三样过了
USCIS has determined that the petitioner has provided sufficient
documentation to establish the
beneficiary has met the following regulatory criteria:
• Evidence of the alien's participation, either individually or on a
panel, as the judge of the work of others in the same or an allied academic
field
• Evidence of the alien's original scientific or scholarly research
contributions to the academic field
• Evidence of the alien's authorship of scholarly books or articles (
in scholarly journals with international circulation) in the academic field
奇怪的是没有claim prize/award, 只是在PL中提到自己参与了DOE支持的项目，竟然被
要求提供证明。
USCIS has determined that the petitioner provided documentation, but failed
to establish eligibility for the following criteria.
*Documentation of the alien's receipt of major prizes or awards for
outstanding achievement in the academic field.
Final Merits Analysis
The records shows that the alien has served as reviwer in his academic field
and on a TPC, but the evidence does not prove the alien's participation in
the widespread peer-reviewer process(a routine process...). Such acclaim is
more commonly associated with selection for service... (有封独立推荐信是来自
一位主编的，已经说了reviewer的选取是高标准的）
....Alien's scientific or scholarly research contributions to the academic
field must be demonstrated by the preexisting, independent, and objective
evidence. USCIS is ultimately responsible for making the final determination
of the alien's eligibility.
....USCIS considers the number of independent citations an objective,
reliable measurement in determining the alien's original contributions to
the academic field. Publishing alone may serve as evidence of originality,
but it is difficult to determine the published work's importance or
influence if there is little or no evidence that other researchers have
relied on the alien's finding. (引用太低，这部分是最头大的）
And so, upon examining the alien's citation history. USICS has determined
that this body of work demonstrates little influence on the field as whole.
Therefore, without further evidence establishing that the alien's work has
contributed significantly to the academic field, USCIS cannot conclude that
the alien is recognized internationally as an outstanding researcher. (申请
时没有提供citation数据，难道USCIS自己在网上查？）
Although the evidence of record shows that the alien meets the plain
language of 3 regulatory critera, he is not strong in any; moreover, the
evidence does not establish that the alien's original research has
contributed significantly to the field as a whole. You have proven that the
alien is a promising and highly-regarded researcher, having earned the
respect of this collaborators and employer while securing some degree of
international exposure for his work; but the records stops short of
elevating the alien to the level of one who is recognized internationally as
outstanding in the academic field.
As dicussed, USCIS has evaluated the evidence and determined that the
evidence does not establish that the beneficiary is an outstanding professor
or researcher in accordance with 203(b)(1(B)(i) of the INA.
比申请时现在又多3篇文章（非一作，第三篇是通信作者刚接收还没正式出版)，3月份
升成IEEE Senior Member，review估计多个10多个，还没具体数，又多一个会议的TPC
要求在5月21日前回复，非常感谢大家的建议和祝福
