EB1A 140 PP RFE 求助# Immigration - 落地生根
y*k
1 楼
背景：polymer chemistry
Journal publication: 12 ( 5 first-authored, IF: 4-20)
Citation: 275
Review: 22 (IF:1-5)
推荐信：
推荐信一共6封，全部独立。3美国、1法国、1英国、1中国。全部引用过我的文章。
claim，review, publication, contribution.
RFE肯定了publication和review, 质疑contribution.
Contribution: PL里提交了publication, journal rank, citation rank, 油灯图，引
用国家机构列表, citation from one Nobel Laureate and two National Academy of
Sciences, 推荐信里6人都引用了我的文章。Contribution里介绍了自己的研究成果，
结合citation rank 证明是top1% ，然后加上推荐信的大段内容证明contribution，同
时附上牛人的引用证明重要性。
RFE里基本质疑了contribution
“This criterion has not been met because the evidence submitted does not
show that the beneficiary's contributions are considered to be of major
significance in the field of endeavor. The petitioner has provided citations
listings and recommendation letters to meet this criterion. The provided
evidence shows that the beneficiary has contributed to the field of endeavor
. However, additional evidence is required to show that these contributions
are of major significance. To assist in determining whether the beneficiary'
s contributions are original and of major significance in the field, the
petitioner may submit: XXXXXXX”
补充材料，律师建议深挖引用亮点，我的工作如何被别人应用，为什么被别人引用，提
供大段正面评论。我的case很弱，只有重新找人写推荐信了，引用我能挖的已经差不多
了，只有再买几把锄头了。求大神们给点建议吧。
Journal publication: 12 ( 5 first-authored, IF: 4-20)
Citation: 275
Review: 22 (IF:1-5)
推荐信：
推荐信一共6封，全部独立。3美国、1法国、1英国、1中国。全部引用过我的文章。
claim，review, publication, contribution.
RFE肯定了publication和review, 质疑contribution.
Contribution: PL里提交了publication, journal rank, citation rank, 油灯图，引
用国家机构列表, citation from one Nobel Laureate and two National Academy of
Sciences, 推荐信里6人都引用了我的文章。Contribution里介绍了自己的研究成果，
结合citation rank 证明是top1% ，然后加上推荐信的大段内容证明contribution，同
时附上牛人的引用证明重要性。
RFE里基本质疑了contribution
“This criterion has not been met because the evidence submitted does not
show that the beneficiary's contributions are considered to be of major
significance in the field of endeavor. The petitioner has provided citations
listings and recommendation letters to meet this criterion. The provided
evidence shows that the beneficiary has contributed to the field of endeavor
. However, additional evidence is required to show that these contributions
are of major significance. To assist in determining whether the beneficiary'
s contributions are original and of major significance in the field, the
petitioner may submit: XXXXXXX”
补充材料，律师建议深挖引用亮点，我的工作如何被别人应用，为什么被别人引用，提
供大段正面评论。我的case很弱，只有重新找人写推荐信了，引用我能挖的已经差不多
了，只有再买几把锄头了。求大神们给点建议吧。
