EB1B NOID 0150 紧急求助， 有经验的过来支支招啊，不胜感激# Immigration - 落地生根
w*r
1 楼
背景 EE 工业界
1.Journal+confer 27 其中包括10项公司专利，正在产品中使用的3项
2.引用 30，这个是硬伤，行业领域的关系，技术比较成熟，大部分都有专利保护，高
校做相关研究的比较少
3.support letter 8 篇，美国相关公司director 2篇，一篇独立。 其余 美国1，德国
2，瑞典1，中国2的教授，其中4个独立
4.review只要1篇，律师也claim了，当初建议她去掉，她说保留
三月初EB1B file pp，八天被NOID，工号0150
公司的Frogman律师，公司不让找外面的律师
律师claim了5想，现在承认3项，分别是
1.judge of the work of others
2. authorship of scholarly books or articles
3.original contribution to the academic field.
但是not show strong in any of them.
确实引用和审稿都是硬伤
想到的证据
1.之前被韩国三星邀请去做报告，说对我的研究感兴趣正在学习，可否做个报告，有
Email证明。
2.去MIT做过访问学者，邀请信上肯定了我的工作。
3.LinkedIn 上有几个美国知名公司人事的职位邀请，和 中科大一个朋友问有没有兴趣
回国做教授， 还有很多猎头的职位邀请
这些可以作为证据吗，该列在哪一项下面呢，职位邀请也算吗？
请各位有经验的朋友不吝赐教，不胜感激啊！！现在只剩半个月了，律师等我写好后给
她改。另外现在是O1签证，去年五月申请的，有什么帮助吗？
谢谢，快来提点建议，整理的要吐血了，担心过不了了。
具体质疑的地方
1. 审稿 The record shows that the alien served as a reviewer in the academic
field, but the evidence does not prove that the alien’s participation in
the widespread process (a routine process in the field relying on many
scientists) exceeds that of other researchers or reflects international
recognition. 找了杂志的主编写了选择审稿人的要求
2.推荐信 Yet the alien’s scientific or scholarly research contributions to
the academic field must be demonstrated by preexisting, independent, and
objective evidence. 5个独立推荐，但是都没有引用过我的工作
3. 专利 Certainly a researcher is expected to develop and design
innovations for his employer, whose intellectual property is protected by
patents. The evidence simply shows that the beneficiary is a productive
member of his research team, but hardly establishes that his “Achievements
have been recognized in the field of expertise”. We must determine on a
case-by-case basis the contribution of the innovation to the academic field.
Therefore, you must submit preexisting, independent, and objective evidence
that the innovation is being widely utilized by scientists in the field,
beyond your employer, clients, or customers.不够广泛认知， 这个应该怎么回应
啊，找了自己专利用在产品中的图，涉及保密，好多东西不能写
4.引用 The record does not contain any evidence of the beneficiary’s work
being widely cited. Therefore, USCIS has concluded that though convincing
original research contributions, they do not establish that the alien is
recognized internationally as outstanding in the academic field. 引用也太低
了，他引才十几个，没什么亮点和好的期刊，有中国，美国，马来的引用。统计了下行
业类同期刊大致的引用率和自己对比，列了几个引用的文章，还有什么可以写吗，实在
找不出亮点，没什么好学校，有一篇浙大的引用，不知道怎么强调
1.Journal+confer 27 其中包括10项公司专利，正在产品中使用的3项
2.引用 30，这个是硬伤，行业领域的关系，技术比较成熟，大部分都有专利保护，高
校做相关研究的比较少
3.support letter 8 篇，美国相关公司director 2篇，一篇独立。 其余 美国1，德国
2，瑞典1，中国2的教授，其中4个独立
4.review只要1篇，律师也claim了，当初建议她去掉，她说保留
三月初EB1B file pp，八天被NOID，工号0150
公司的Frogman律师，公司不让找外面的律师
律师claim了5想，现在承认3项，分别是
1.judge of the work of others
2. authorship of scholarly books or articles
3.original contribution to the academic field.
但是not show strong in any of them.
确实引用和审稿都是硬伤
想到的证据
1.之前被韩国三星邀请去做报告，说对我的研究感兴趣正在学习，可否做个报告，有
Email证明。
2.去MIT做过访问学者，邀请信上肯定了我的工作。
3.LinkedIn 上有几个美国知名公司人事的职位邀请，和 中科大一个朋友问有没有兴趣
回国做教授， 还有很多猎头的职位邀请
这些可以作为证据吗，该列在哪一项下面呢，职位邀请也算吗？
请各位有经验的朋友不吝赐教，不胜感激啊！！现在只剩半个月了，律师等我写好后给
她改。另外现在是O1签证，去年五月申请的，有什么帮助吗？
谢谢，快来提点建议，整理的要吐血了，担心过不了了。
具体质疑的地方
1. 审稿 The record shows that the alien served as a reviewer in the academic
field, but the evidence does not prove that the alien’s participation in
the widespread process (a routine process in the field relying on many
scientists) exceeds that of other researchers or reflects international
recognition. 找了杂志的主编写了选择审稿人的要求
2.推荐信 Yet the alien’s scientific or scholarly research contributions to
the academic field must be demonstrated by preexisting, independent, and
objective evidence. 5个独立推荐，但是都没有引用过我的工作
3. 专利 Certainly a researcher is expected to develop and design
innovations for his employer, whose intellectual property is protected by
patents. The evidence simply shows that the beneficiary is a productive
member of his research team, but hardly establishes that his “Achievements
have been recognized in the field of expertise”. We must determine on a
case-by-case basis the contribution of the innovation to the academic field.
Therefore, you must submit preexisting, independent, and objective evidence
that the innovation is being widely utilized by scientists in the field,
beyond your employer, clients, or customers.不够广泛认知， 这个应该怎么回应
啊，找了自己专利用在产品中的图，涉及保密，好多东西不能写
4.引用 The record does not contain any evidence of the beneficiary’s work
being widely cited. Therefore, USCIS has concluded that though convincing
original research contributions, they do not establish that the alien is
recognized internationally as outstanding in the academic field. 引用也太低
了，他引才十几个，没什么亮点和好的期刊，有中国，美国，马来的引用。统计了下行
业类同期刊大致的引用率和自己对比，列了几个引用的文章，还有什么可以写吗，实在
找不出亮点，没什么好学校，有一篇浙大的引用，不知道怎么强调
