请问哪个J2EE MVC Framework最有前途 - 未名空间MITBBS历史存档

国际科技财经博客移民网络热点娱乐民生时事公众号

Redian新闻

>未名空间

>Java - 爪哇娇娃

请问哪个J2EE MVC Framework最有前途

请问哪个J2EE MVC Framework最有前途# Java - 爪哇娇娃

w*r2009-01-06 08:01

1 楼

最常见的有Struts 2, JSF, Spring Web Flow
想找J2EE的工作，该从哪个开始下手呢？
请哪位好心人赐教！
还有，Struts Classic(1.x) in maintanace stage == 等死?

g*g2009-01-06 08:01

2 楼

Personally, I think Wicket is the best framework to date.
It's a component framework, not MVC framework though.

【在 w**r 的大作中提到】

: 最常见的有Struts 2, JSF, Spring Web Flow
: 想找J2EE的工作，该从哪个开始下手呢？
: 请哪位好心人赐教！
: 还有，Struts Classic(1.x) in maintanace stage == 等死?

s*d2009-01-06 08:01

3 楼

最近看了看wicket, 感觉wicket 目前是不是定制好的构件比较少啊？比如color
picker, date
picker, process train, tree list还有复杂一点的表格支持好像都没有吧，而且不知
道目前大的IDE
vendors对wicket是什么态度,虽然说wicket对IDE的依赖比较小，但是复杂一点的网站
，几十个page，每
个page近百个components, 如果IDE能够智能地在java文件和HTML文件之间穿梭, 对两
边的模块能够建立
自动的映射（比如在HTML编辑窗口里右点击某个HTML component 就自动打开并定位到
相应java 文件里
的对应模块上），对提高工作效率还是会有不少帮组的。

【在 g*****g 的大作中提到】

: Personally, I think Wicket is the best framework to date.
: It's a component framework, not MVC framework though.

g*g2009-01-06 08:01

4 楼

There's wicket plugin for eclipse. And write a custom component
is simpler than most frameworks I know.
http://xhab.blogspot.com/2007/06/wicket-jquery-tab-component.html
check this blog entry to get a taste of it.
It doesn't require reading a 400 pages book to write an ajax component like
jsf does.

【在 s****d 的大作中提到】

: 最近看了看wicket, 感觉wicket 目前是不是定制好的构件比较少啊？比如color
: picker, date
: picker, process train, tree list还有复杂一点的表格支持好像都没有吧，而且不知
: 道目前大的IDE
: vendors对wicket是什么态度,虽然说wicket对IDE的依赖比较小，但是复杂一点的网站
: ，几十个page，每
: 个page近百个components, 如果IDE能够智能地在java文件和HTML文件之间穿梭, 对两
: 边的模块能够建立
: 自动的映射（比如在HTML编辑窗口里右点击某个HTML component 就自动打开并定位到
: 相应java 文件里

k*r2009-01-06 08:01

5 楼

看了一下没看懂。如果是用jquery+plugin，为什么叫做develop?
不过我也不懂wicket，也许需要adapt一下？

like

【在 g*****g 的大作中提到】

: There's wicket plugin for eclipse. And write a custom component
: is simpler than most frameworks I know.
: http://xhab.blogspot.com/2007/06/wicket-jquery-tab-component.html
: check this blog entry to get a taste of it.
: It doesn't require reading a 400 pages book to write an ajax component like
: jsf does.

z*a2009-01-06 08:01

6 楼

have you tried icefaces?
I heard it is very good.

D*a2009-01-06 08:01

7 楼

Try GWT and you can enjoy more if you are a pure Java programmer!!

b*y2009-01-06 08:01

8 楼

Yep, I like GWT, widely supported and open source.

k*r2009-01-06 08:01

9 楼

Seriously, what "more" do you get if you compare GWT with
the component frameworks?

【在 D*****a 的大作中提到】

: Try GWT and you can enjoy more if you are a pure Java programmer!!

g*g2009-01-06 08:01

10 楼

GWT is a pure client framework, it's fine at doing what it's doing.
But it may fall short when doing
1. When you need custom component
2. When integrate with traditional web design
Every framework has advantage and drawback, but there's no one fits all
approach. After evaluate many frameworks, I agree with this option.
Stripes is best action-based framework, Wicket is best component framework.

【在 k***r 的大作中提到】

: Seriously, what "more" do you get if you compare GWT with
: the component frameworks?

D*a2009-01-06 08:01

11 楼

The best part is that you could program/debug Javascript/Ajax code using
Java. And the front-end could communicate with the Server through pure
serialized Java objects, thus you could move large part of the logic from
Server to the Web client.

【在 k***r 的大作中提到】

: Seriously, what "more" do you get if you compare GWT with
: the component frameworks?

k*r2009-01-06 08:01

12 楼

With the component frameworks, most of the work is done in Java, too,
but in the back-end, so it goes the opposite of the JS-heavy frameworks.
I'm not sure if it's a good thing or bad thing. More load on the server,
lighter on the client and easier to go mobile. More load on the client,
easier on server load. I guess either approach has some advantages.

【在 D*****a 的大作中提到】

: The best part is that you could program/debug Javascript/Ajax code using
: Java. And the front-end could communicate with the Server through pure
: serialized Java objects, thus you could move large part of the logic from
: Server to the Web client.

F*n2009-01-06 08:01

13 楼

ZK is good. It's the C++ in this category (a bit messy but is flexible
enough to do almost everything). Moreover, there is a ZK plug-in in Eclipse
which offers drag-N-drop visual component editor.

【在 s****d 的大作中提到】

k*r2009-01-06 08:01

14 楼

Wicket and GWT compared with code
http://ptrthomas.wordpress.com/2008/09/04/wicket-and-gwt-compared-with-code/