关于分布式ESB的问题# Java - 爪哇娇娃
p*p
1 楼
我理解是不是ESB可以实体上分布在不同的机器，但是逻辑上属于一个Domain,ESB会自
动route message到目的地实体。请问是所有ESB都支持这样么。
动route message到目的地实体。请问是所有ESB都支持这样么。
t*e
2 楼
Theoretically, what you described is supported by all ESB servers via
remote JNDI look up.
remote JNDI look up.
m*t
3 楼
We are in the process of moving from an open source ESB implementation
to a commercial vendor, whose main selling point is "a completely
distributed
auto message-routing deployment structure which provides hot failover and
load balancing."
Personally I think it's all snake oil, but people do buy it apparently.
【在 t*******e 的大作中提到】
: Theoretically, what you described is supported by all ESB servers via
: remote JNDI look up.
o*1
4 楼
what open source esb were you using?
【在 m******t 的大作中提到】
:
: We are in the process of moving from an open source ESB implementation
: to a commercial vendor, whose main selling point is "a completely
: distributed
: auto message-routing deployment structure which provides hot failover and
: load balancing."
: Personally I think it's all snake oil, but people do buy it apparently.
【在 m******t 的大作中提到】
:
: We are in the process of moving from an open source ESB implementation
: to a commercial vendor, whose main selling point is "a completely
: distributed
: auto message-routing deployment structure which provides hot failover and
: load balancing."
: Personally I think it's all snake oil, but people do buy it apparently.
m*t
5 楼
Mule.
【在 o**1 的大作中提到】
: what open source esb were you using?
o*1
6 楼
I am starting to learn and use Mule. But the problem is: mule becomes the
single point of failure. If mule fails, everything fails. also if something
needs to be changed, mule has to be restarted, which makes the whole service
bus down.
【在 m******t 的大作中提到】
:
: Mule.
single point of failure. If mule fails, everything fails. also if something
needs to be changed, mule has to be restarted, which makes the whole service
bus down.
【在 m******t 的大作中提到】
:
: Mule.
t*e
7 楼
Without external dependencies, isolated applications are the most stable.
SOA improves service reusability by integrating remote services onto a
centralized ESB. The trade off is the increasing chance of application
failure. Each reusable service on ESB is a single point of failure. ESB
redundancy doesn't do any good, as service failure in most case is code/
database related, thus, when it happens, it happens across the board. In
summary, SOA has a more stringent requirement on application/servi
SOA improves service reusability by integrating remote services onto a
centralized ESB. The trade off is the increasing chance of application
failure. Each reusable service on ESB is a single point of failure. ESB
redundancy doesn't do any good, as service failure in most case is code/
database related, thus, when it happens, it happens across the board. In
summary, SOA has a more stringent requirement on application/servi
b*y
8 楼
good point
p*p
9 楼
谢谢各位的意见
相关阅读
[转载] blackdown-jdk 和 sun-jdk哪个好？土问题：一个文件路经的简单问题，帮帮忙question about repaint, update and painthehe, Neo (.NET Entity Objects)Re: how to dynamically load a tooltipJDBC vs Application Server[转载] java plugin problem under solarisHelp on compiling servlet with TomcatSun One Studio 中如何enable assertgetLocalHost() with multiple networkcardDOM 问题copy constructor都什么时候be called啊photosig.com问一个特别土的问题急救！如何用java在unix中调用netscape???大虾请指点solvedRe: how to change the input mode?interface可不可以有variable?two applet in one frame问个java里得到时间的问题