b*y
2 楼
What are the impacts? discuss 1 down ba...
g*g
3 楼
Java is fine, MySql is doomed.
【在 b******y 的大作中提到】
: What are the impacts? discuss 1 down ba...
【在 b******y 的大作中提到】
: What are the impacts? discuss 1 down ba...
b*y
4 楼
not necessarily ba, oracle db is for high end,
mysql is for small to mid business market,
competing with oracle express and sql server
【在 g*****g 的大作中提到】
: Java is fine, MySql is doomed.
mysql is for small to mid business market,
competing with oracle express and sql server
【在 g*****g 的大作中提到】
: Java is fine, MySql is doomed.
z*e
5 楼
the group of companies who support java is gonna split
IBM may develop their own java language, just like M$ did
【在 b******y 的大作中提到】
: What are the impacts? discuss 1 down ba...
IBM may develop their own java language, just like M$ did
【在 b******y 的大作中提到】
: What are the impacts? discuss 1 down ba...
s*n
6 楼
the next JDK will cost $1,028,842 - per CPU.
【在 b******y 的大作中提到】
: What are the impacts? discuss 1 down ba...
【在 b******y 的大作中提到】
: What are the impacts? discuss 1 down ba...
g*e
7 楼
It will be interesting to see if IBM will change its JAVA strategy...
【在 b******y 的大作中提到】
: What are the impacts? discuss 1 down ba...
【在 b******y 的大作中提到】
: What are the impacts? discuss 1 down ba...
b*y
8 楼
ibm is in an embarrassing position now..
they invested a lot on java,
it's not easy to just go away and reinvent new wheels
【在 z****e 的大作中提到】
: the group of companies who support java is gonna split
: IBM may develop their own java language, just like M$ did
they invested a lot on java,
it's not easy to just go away and reinvent new wheels
【在 z****e 的大作中提到】
: the group of companies who support java is gonna split
: IBM may develop their own java language, just like M$ did
g*g
9 楼
Oracle invested a lot on Java too, don't forget they own BEA.
But I don't like Oracle owing Java. It would be IBM's interests
to make Java more open, not neccesarily Oracle.
【在 b******y 的大作中提到】
: ibm is in an embarrassing position now..
: they invested a lot on java,
: it's not easy to just go away and reinvent new wheels
But I don't like Oracle owing Java. It would be IBM's interests
to make Java more open, not neccesarily Oracle.
【在 b******y 的大作中提到】
: ibm is in an embarrassing position now..
: they invested a lot on java,
: it's not easy to just go away and reinvent new wheels
g*g
10 楼
Kill MySQL, you have to go back and pay Oracle. How many alternatives
you have? I doubt Sun is earning money on MySQL at all. Or they may
start charging MySQL per CPU.
【在 b******y 的大作中提到】
: not necessarily ba, oracle db is for high end,
: mysql is for small to mid business market,
: competing with oracle express and sql server
you have? I doubt Sun is earning money on MySQL at all. Or they may
start charging MySQL per CPU.
【在 b******y 的大作中提到】
: not necessarily ba, oracle db is for high end,
: mysql is for small to mid business market,
: competing with oracle express and sql server
b*y
11 楼
after oracle bought bea, weblogic went up to $25k from $17k
oracle is becoming another evil.
【在 g*****g 的大作中提到】
: Oracle invested a lot on Java too, don't forget they own BEA.
: But I don't like Oracle owing Java. It would be IBM's interests
: to make Java more open, not neccesarily Oracle.
oracle is becoming another evil.
【在 g*****g 的大作中提到】
: Oracle invested a lot on Java too, don't forget they own BEA.
: But I don't like Oracle owing Java. It would be IBM's interests
: to make Java more open, not neccesarily Oracle.
b*y
12 楼
sun doesn't earn $ from mysql, doesn't mean oracle can't.
sun's management and sales suck.
【在 g*****g 的大作中提到】
: Kill MySQL, you have to go back and pay Oracle. How many alternatives
: you have? I doubt Sun is earning money on MySQL at all. Or they may
: start charging MySQL per CPU.
sun's management and sales suck.
【在 g*****g 的大作中提到】
: Kill MySQL, you have to go back and pay Oracle. How many alternatives
: you have? I doubt Sun is earning money on MySQL at all. Or they may
: start charging MySQL per CPU.
z*e
13 楼
not only IBM
but also many other companies, organizations and individuals
invested in java technology
mysql is a lost to open source lovers
that's why i hope redhat wont be merged by ORACLE
in that case, we will lost jboss which is my favor
anyway, although reinvent a wheel is heavily costly
i still believe IBM has that kind of 魄力
its time to give birth to another modern popular language
【在 b******y 的大作中提到】
: ibm is in an embarrassing position now..
: they invested a lot on java,
: it's not easy to just go away and reinvent new wheels
but also many other companies, organizations and individuals
invested in java technology
mysql is a lost to open source lovers
that's why i hope redhat wont be merged by ORACLE
in that case, we will lost jboss which is my favor
anyway, although reinvent a wheel is heavily costly
i still believe IBM has that kind of 魄力
its time to give birth to another modern popular language
【在 b******y 的大作中提到】
: ibm is in an embarrassing position now..
: they invested a lot on java,
: it's not easy to just go away and reinvent new wheels
A*o
14 楼
jrockit will no longer, i think.
m*t
15 楼
Well that shouldn't be too hard, given
the language explosion we are in.
【在 z****e 的大作中提到】
: not only IBM
: but also many other companies, organizations and individuals
: invested in java technology
: mysql is a lost to open source lovers
: that's why i hope redhat wont be merged by ORACLE
: in that case, we will lost jboss which is my favor
: anyway, although reinvent a wheel is heavily costly
: i still believe IBM has that kind of 魄力
: its time to give birth to another modern popular language
B*g
16 楼
oracle sales are so good, they call me every 2 weeks.
【在 b******y 的大作中提到】
: sun doesn't earn $ from mysql, doesn't mean oracle can't.
: sun's management and sales suck.
【在 b******y 的大作中提到】
: sun doesn't earn $ from mysql, doesn't mean oracle can't.
: sun's management and sales suck.
m*t
17 楼
That being true, I double at this point
Oracle can actually close up Java - most of the
jdk is gpl'ed.
And that's also saying that I don't actually
see how Oracle can succeed where Sun has failed,
i.e., make money from Java.
【在 g*****g 的大作中提到】
: Oracle invested a lot on Java too, don't forget they own BEA.
: But I don't like Oracle owing Java. It would be IBM's interests
: to make Java more open, not neccesarily Oracle.
s*d
18 楼
oracle does not need to make money off Java directly; it simply wants to
make sure Java does not die or become fragmented due to Sun fading away.
This is critical as 2/3 of Oracle's products are entirely relying on Java (
the Applications and Middleware business lines), the other 1/3 being the
database.
but really I think getting Java is just a by product; the bigger picture is
oracle can now revitalize Solaris and the high-end server hardware market so
it can sell bundled solution to large ente
【在 m******t 的大作中提到】
:
: That being true, I double at this point
: Oracle can actually close up Java - most of the
: jdk is gpl'ed.
: And that's also saying that I don't actually
: see how Oracle can succeed where Sun has failed,
: i.e., make money from Java.
make sure Java does not die or become fragmented due to Sun fading away.
This is critical as 2/3 of Oracle's products are entirely relying on Java (
the Applications and Middleware business lines), the other 1/3 being the
database.
but really I think getting Java is just a by product; the bigger picture is
oracle can now revitalize Solaris and the high-end server hardware market so
it can sell bundled solution to large ente
【在 m******t 的大作中提到】
:
: That being true, I double at this point
: Oracle can actually close up Java - most of the
: jdk is gpl'ed.
: And that's also saying that I don't actually
: see how Oracle can succeed where Sun has failed,
: i.e., make money from Java.
g*g
19 楼
Not quite, check Harmony for instance, they are unable to get TCK license
from Sun. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apache_Harmony
Since they now control Java implementation. Maybe they can optimize Java
to run with Solaris and Oracle and get an technical edge, one stop shop
Java.net is not a bad idea. Or if they play
evil, they may find some way to screw IBM. like
if(connnecting to DB2) {
System.exit(1)
}
One way or ther other, IBM is in an awkward position and Oracle is the
winner.
【在 m******t 的大作中提到】
:
: That being true, I double at this point
: Oracle can actually close up Java - most of the
: jdk is gpl'ed.
: And that's also saying that I don't actually
: see how Oracle can succeed where Sun has failed,
: i.e., make money from Java.
B*g
20 楼
zan.
【在 g*****g 的大作中提到】
:
: Not quite, check Harmony for instance, they are unable to get TCK license
: from Sun. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apache_Harmony
: Since they now control Java implementation. Maybe they can optimize Java
: to run with Solaris and Oracle and get an technical edge, one stop shop
: Java.net is not a bad idea. Or if they play
: evil, they may find some way to screw IBM. like
: if(connnecting to DB2) {
: System.exit(1)
: }
【在 g*****g 的大作中提到】
:
: Not quite, check Harmony for instance, they are unable to get TCK license
: from Sun. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apache_Harmony
: Since they now control Java implementation. Maybe they can optimize Java
: to run with Solaris and Oracle and get an technical edge, one stop shop
: Java.net is not a bad idea. Or if they play
: evil, they may find some way to screw IBM. like
: if(connnecting to DB2) {
: System.exit(1)
: }
m*t
21 楼
That's because Harmony wants to be APL. A GPL implementation
would not have the problem.
But they don't. And they can't.
There are other languages providing the same quality and
suitable for enterprise system development as Java is.
It would not be in Oracle's best interest to buy Java only to smother
it to death.
【在 g*****g 的大作中提到】
:
: Not quite, check Harmony for instance, they are unable to get TCK license
: from Sun. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apache_Harmony
: Since they now control Java implementation. Maybe they can optimize Java
: to run with Solaris and Oracle and get an technical edge, one stop shop
: Java.net is not a bad idea. Or if they play
: evil, they may find some way to screw IBM. like
: if(connnecting to DB2) {
: System.exit(1)
: }
g*g
22 楼
It's not Oracle's best interest to kill Java, but they may
provide community version and enterprise version soon.
【在 m******t 的大作中提到】
:
: That's because Harmony wants to be APL. A GPL implementation
: would not have the problem.
: But they don't. And they can't.
: There are other languages providing the same quality and
: suitable for enterprise system development as Java is.
: It would not be in Oracle's best interest to buy Java only to smother
: it to death.
provide community version and enterprise version soon.
【在 m******t 的大作中提到】
:
: That's because Harmony wants to be APL. A GPL implementation
: would not have the problem.
: But they don't. And they can't.
: There are other languages providing the same quality and
: suitable for enterprise system development as Java is.
: It would not be in Oracle's best interest to buy Java only to smother
: it to death.
m*t
23 楼
Which would be fine. It's not like they are going to disable
GC in the "community version". 8-)
【在 g*****g 的大作中提到】
: It's not Oracle's best interest to kill Java, but they may
: provide community version and enterprise version soon.
w*d
24 楼
But you won't get certain performance enhancement or features in community
version, otherwise, who will pay for the enterprise version?
【在 m******t 的大作中提到】
:
: Which would be fine. It's not like they are going to disable
: GC in the "community version". 8-)
version, otherwise, who will pay for the enterprise version?
【在 m******t 的大作中提到】
:
: Which would be fine. It's not like they are going to disable
: GC in the "community version". 8-)
相关阅读
how to get time(ms) in Java?pdf -> txtmemory usage profiling?jbuilderx 注册问题Eclipse vs. Jbuilder X ?Java能帮我做这个project吗?这几天Oracle 92I经常出现ORA-00600的错误[转载] 怎样让鼠标指向文字的时候文字变化 ？java certification?[转载] 有人在用NetBeans IDE么？Pls help how to open a dialog or frame?我的几个小项目，和大家分享 Borland Crazy Again[转载] Urgent Help needed about Java Servlet?How to rename a file to Chinese?Re: help for running CPUautomated web article poster急问：装了JSDK2.0,servlet engine 不 运 行 ？JDBC用完了oracle的large pool (memory)，怎么办？SideStep Script?