Spring 2.5 vs. EJB3.0 - 未名空间MITBBS历史存档

国际科技财经博客移民网络热点娱乐民生时事公众号

Redian新闻

>未名空间

>Java - 爪哇娇娃

Spring 2.5 vs. EJB3.0

Spring 2.5 vs. EJB3.0# Java - 爪哇娇娃

g*g2009-04-20 07:04

1 楼

With new Spring 2.5 annotation. They now share about 90% of
functionalities and program paradigms. With Spring being more flexible,
powerful, but more verbose (still needs some XML and more configuration)
Spring is more friendly for test-driven approach as you don't need to run
the container for unit testing.
It's also said Spring may be a vendor for EJB3.1 and the gap would be
closed.
I am still disappointed at java web framework. We have more frameworks than
applications and we can't settle on

b*y2009-04-20 07:04

2 楼

does spring2.5 require a container that handles security, transaction etc?

than

【在 g*****g 的大作中提到】

: With new Spring 2.5 annotation. They now share about 90% of
: functionalities and program paradigms. With Spring being more flexible,
: powerful, but more verbose (still needs some XML and more configuration)
: Spring is more friendly for test-driven approach as you don't need to run
: the container for unit testing.
: It's also said Spring may be a vendor for EJB3.1 and the gap would be
: closed.
: I am still disappointed at java web framework. We have more frameworks than
: applications and we can't settle on

g*g2009-04-20 07:04

3 楼

Yes, but it can be done in an embedded way. Although EJB3 can be embedded
for some implementation like jboss.

【在 b******y 的大作中提到】

: does spring2.5 require a container that handles security, transaction etc?
:
: than

A*o2009-04-20 07:04

4 楼

Does spring handle persistence yet?

g*g2009-04-20 07:04

5 楼

No, you have to use hibernate or JTA or another ORM solution.

【在 A**o 的大作中提到】

: Does spring handle persistence yet?

m*t2009-04-20 07:04

6 楼

It seems that springsource is strategically focusing
on their own osgi-based app server.

than

【在 g*****g 的大作中提到】

g*g2009-04-20 07:04

7 楼

Selling books and seminars aren't quick enough to build a fortune.

【在 m******t 的大作中提到】

: It seems that springsource is strategically focusing
: on their own osgi-based app server.
:
: than

k*r2009-04-20 07:04

8 楼

I thought you were happy with wicket?

than
doens't

【在 g*****g 的大作中提到】

: Selling books and seminars aren't quick enough to build a fortune.

g*g2009-04-20 07:04

9 楼

I am, but until it's as popular as struts years ago,
you won't get enough developer familiar with it, you
don't have vendors developing components for it.

【在 k***r 的大作中提到】

: I thought you were happy with wicket?
:
: than
: doens't

k*r2009-04-20 07:04

10 楼

It's picking up some momentum, though. But it still lacks
the critical mass to make a substantial impact, unfortunately.
I suspect that there's still something that's not done entirely
right in wicket, which is preventing it from getting more
attention. With my very limited understanding, the component
concept still feels exotic to most people. Plus, ajax is not
built-in. It feels it's bolted on. It's not as simple as
switching a flag on and off to enable/disable ajax.

【在 g*****g 的大作中提到】

: I am, but until it's as popular as struts years ago,
: you won't get enough developer familiar with it, you
: don't have vendors developing components for it.