ok. what is the correct way? I think this is also a big question ...
【在 b****e 的大作中提到】 : Right, but we got to learn how to catch mouse rather than to predict how : many mice we can catch with certain method.
x*0
28 楼
感兴趣的赶紧联系我!!
K*D
29 楼
1) standardize measurement equipment. 2) do experiments and record measurements. 3) compare and track the results to decide the performance. 4) Propose new experiment methods on new projects based on past experiment results.
【在 f****t 的大作中提到】 : ok. what is the correct way? I think this is also a big question ...
z*0
30 楼
现在这个所以就没房子了吧
b*e
31 楼
I mean I am never very serious about future return rate, that's not important. It's something nobody can predict accurately. However, whether the investment strategy is sound is more important.
【在 f****t 的大作中提到】 : ok. what is the correct way? I think this is also a big question ...
x*0
32 楼
还有
b*e
33 楼
My 2 cents, the overall stock market shouldn't be far away from the GDP. But GDP is kind of total revenue, stock is kind of earning power.
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】 : borrow human gas to ask a question: : in the long run, should stock market track GDP?
f*t
34 楼
so when you are 100, you are still doing your experiment ...
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】 : 1) standardize measurement equipment. : 2) do experiments and record measurements. : 3) compare and track the results to decide the performance. : 4) Propose new experiment methods on new projects based on past : experiment results.
f*t
35 楼
do you think his method in the ChinaStock is sound?
【在 b****e 的大作中提到】 : I mean I am never very serious about future return rate, that's not : important. It's something nobody can predict accurately. However, whether : the investment strategy is sound is more important.
K*D
36 楼
That's exactly the spirit of a scientist, hehe.
【在 f****t 的大作中提到】 : do you think his method in the ChinaStock is sound?
f*t
37 楼
this is the old way. the new way, get a N prize at 40, and then retire ;)
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】 : That's exactly the spirit of a scientist, hehe.
K*D
38 楼
Although what he proposed is not too much different from a 1-year DCA which is OK, I frowned when I read "然后开始换 一种计算方法". I just hate sth like that, //sigh... Again, standardize your measurement equipment before doing experiments.
【在 f****t 的大作中提到】 : do you think his method in the ChinaStock is sound?
K*D
39 楼
You mean now scientists also start to gamble? @[email protected] Like proposing some very aggressive experiment plan, with only 1% chance of success, but if succeeded, that'll be a N-Prize level blast.
【在 f****t 的大作中提到】 : this is the old way. : the new way, get a N prize at 40, and then retire ;)
b*e
40 楼
It doesn't sound bad to try to chip in gradually when market is low. But, I won't buy something without even looking at the price.
【在 f****t 的大作中提到】 : do you think his method in the ChinaStock is sound?
K*D
41 楼
Then there is no way China can sustain 16% GDP in the next 20-30 years.
【在 b****e 的大作中提到】 : My 2 cents, the overall stock market shouldn't be far away from the GDP. : But GDP is kind of total revenue, stock is kind of earning power.
f*t
42 楼
any one on the earth can do that?
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】 : Then there is no way China can sustain 16% GDP in the next 20-30 : years.
K*D
43 楼
Wait, there seems to be inflation too. So GDP doesn't need to be 16%. But again, I still don't think there is any way China can sustain 10% GDP for 20-30 years.
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】 : Then there is no way China can sustain 16% GDP in the next 20-30 : years.
b*e
44 楼
At 1800 point, I think Chinese stocks are just fair priced rather than bargain priced. So, at that level I won't put everything in it.
I
【在 b****e 的大作中提到】 : It doesn't sound bad to try to chip in gradually when market is low. But, I : won't buy something without even looking at the price.
f*t
45 楼
currently us market is also low, but who knows what will happen in the next 20-30 years, china market is better, or us market is better. sigh...
I
【在 b****e 的大作中提到】 : It doesn't sound bad to try to chip in gradually when market is low. But, I : won't buy something without even looking at the price.
b*e
46 楼
Right, it's really hard to say. My personal evaluation is that US market is cheaper than Chinese market. But, most US companies are in their senior ages and most Chinese companies are relatively young. When you get an old company, chances are it has a lot of problems because of its age. And, most Chinese manufacturers are low cost producers, which I like very much. But, whether these things can offset the price difference, it's hard to say. I personally prefer cheap things.
next
【在 f****t 的大作中提到】 : currently us market is also low, but who knows what will happen in the next : 20-30 years, china market is better, or us market is better. sigh... : : I
【在 g*****g 的大作中提到】 : That's 16% annual increase, not impossible on good stock.
d*d
49 楼
Stock market is nominal growth, GDP is real growth. Nominal rate=real rate+inflation rate 16% of nominal growth/year is very possible in the next 20 years just 10% real growth and 6% inflation each year. China's gdp per capita is like $2000-3000/year, I think it will be over $20000/year in 20 years.
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】 : Wait, there seems to be inflation too. So GDP doesn't need : to be 16%. : But again, I still don't think there is any way China can sustain : 10% GDP for 20-30 years.
s*n
50 楼
My 2 cents, Stock return = capital gain + dividend SP500 Captical growth should match US GDP growth if the weight of SP500 companies in US economy is stable.
【在 b****e 的大作中提到】 : My 2 cents, the overall stock market shouldn't be far away from the GDP. : But GDP is kind of total revenue, stock is kind of earning power.