H*i
2 楼
OMG!
b*r
3 楼
no
r*e
4 楼
对付阿根廷人都要这样
【在 H**********i 的大作中提到】
: OMG!
【在 H**********i 的大作中提到】
: OMG!
J*L
5 楼
不算，只要两篇文章，任何一个名字有重复都不算
l*5
6 楼
换句话说, 只要在你所发文章中出现过的名字, 其所发文章引用了你的PAPER, 都算自
引.
引.
e*l
7 楼
Can I use that type of citations to support my contribution? Could that be
an evidence that my work is the foundation of follow-up research of my
colleagues?
an evidence that my work is the foundation of follow-up research of my
colleagues?
t*h
8 楼
他们想要的是Natinonal和international的牛人。提这个不合适。
【在 e*****l 的大作中提到】
: Can I use that type of citations to support my contribution? Could that be
: an evidence that my work is the foundation of follow-up research of my
: colleagues?
【在 e*****l 的大作中提到】
: Can I use that type of citations to support my contribution? Could that be
: an evidence that my work is the foundation of follow-up research of my
: colleagues?
a*s
9 楼
Still confused.
if the situation like this:
A and B are authors of paper 1;
C cited paper 1 in his/her paper 2; A and B are not in the author list in
paper 2.
B and C are authors of paper 3.
Is paper 2 still an independent citation (for A)?
if the situation like this:
A and B are authors of paper 1;
C cited paper 1 in his/her paper 2; A and B are not in the author list in
paper 2.
B and C are authors of paper 3.
Is paper 2 still an independent citation (for A)?
a*s
10 楼
算不算?
z*y
11 楼
Yes
只要 authorship 的交集为空
【在 a***s 的大作中提到】
: 算不算?
c*k
12 楼
自引也未必是坏事吧。 如果自己组都不引，说明:
1: 结果不可信／不可重复
2: 人缘差
1: 结果不可信／不可重复
2: 人缘差
I*I
13 楼
自引就相当于给自己打广告一样，也是对以后有好处的。
【在 c**k 的大作中提到】
: 自引也未必是坏事吧。 如果自己组都不引，说明:
: 1: 结果不可信／不可重复
: 2: 人缘差
【在 c**k 的大作中提到】
: 自引也未必是坏事吧。 如果自己组都不引，说明:
: 1: 结果不可信／不可重复
: 2: 人缘差
s*1
14 楼
多谢大家的讨论, 清楚多了
b*r
15 楼
not independent.
【在 a***s 的大作中提到】
: Still confused.
: if the situation like this:
: A and B are authors of paper 1;
: C cited paper 1 in his/her paper 2; A and B are not in the author list in
: paper 2.
: B and C are authors of paper 3.
: Is paper 2 still an independent citation (for A)?
【在 a***s 的大作中提到】
: Still confused.
: if the situation like this:
: A and B are authors of paper 1;
: C cited paper 1 in his/her paper 2; A and B are not in the author list in
: paper 2.
: B and C are authors of paper 3.
: Is paper 2 still an independent citation (for A)?
相关阅读