First, the selection criteria for Science Olympiad and college admission are
different. The former is one test (or three total tests) determines all
while the latter might consider MANY factors other than test scores.
Second, the purposes of the two events are different. Science Olympiad is
almost a pure competition to find the BEST while college is for education
for the next generation.
Third, if you think that a top university full of Asian is the solution to
social problems, maybe you should study the relationship between Chinese
universities and the Chinese society, or the relationship between Asian
universities and Asia.
Fourth, the alleged discrimination regarding college admission at Ivy
schools is just an allegation. Particularly for Harvard, which has no set
rules for admission benchmarks, it is extremely unlikely that any lawsuit or
even rulings would change the incoming freshman class dramatically.
Fifth, assuming, arguendo, that Harvard was discriminating against Asian
applicants. It would be very likely that Harvard would continue its
discrimination against those luckily admitted Asian students in Harvard.
Everything is related, right? Then how come there is no complaint against
Harvard from its Asian student bodies or its Asian alumni?
Finally, standard test scores can be improved by training or mock tests
within a short time. Experience with different cultures may take years or
decades to develop. What if the society needs SOMEONE who can deal with
sensitive culture issues after completing the college education? What if the
army needs someone can use slangs to motivate its foot soldiers? What if a
law firm needs a Spanish speaking attorney to handle a racial discrimination
case? Are you up to the challenge?
In closing, let me repeat that the following statement is a lie:
哈佛大学年初时被教育部调查是否在录取上
对亚裔有歧视之嫌，今年亚裔的录取率就是近年来最高的，比往年增加了15%。
我查了一下，这个调查开始１５天之后就被停止了，因为起诉的人撤诉了，现在也没有
类似的调查。这都是事实。８０－２０作为一个标榜自己多么神圣的组织，连这种给别
人抹黑给自己贴金的下三烂的伎俩都使得出来，欺负我们中国人没脑子，没逻辑，没调
查研究的能力，是不是？
你的谎言可能欺骗部分人一世，也可能蒙所有人一时，但你决不可能唬弄所有人一辈子
！等潮水落下去的时候，你会发现自己的泳裤都没了！
首先，科学竞赛和高考录取的选拔标准是不同。前者是一个测试（或共有三个测试）决
定一切而后者可能会考虑其他许多因素，比考试成绩。
第二，这两个事件的目的是不同的。科学奥林匹克几乎是纯粹的竞争找到最好的，而教
育学院为下一代。
第三，如果你认为亚洲的顶尖大学全是解决方案社会问题，也许你应该学习中国之间的
关系大学和中国社会，或与亚洲的关系大学和亚洲。
第四，涉嫌歧视就在常春藤大学录取学校只是一项指控。尤其是哈佛，没有设置入场基
准的规则，这是极不可能的任何诉讼或甚至裁决将大幅改变传入大一类。
第五，假设，arguendo，哈佛针对亚裔的歧视申请人。这将是非常可能的，哈佛大学将
继续其幸运的考入哈佛亚洲学生的歧视。一切都是相关的，对不对？然后，怎么来的，
有没有对投诉来自亚洲的学生团体或亚洲的校友哈佛？
最后，标准的测试成绩可以提高培训或模拟测试在很短的时间内。与不同文化的经验，
可能需要几年或几十年来发展。如果社会需要有人谁可以处理完成大学教育后，敏感的
文化问题？如果军队需要的人可以使用俚语，以激励其步兵？什么如果一家律师事务所
需要一个讲西班牙语的律师来处理种族歧视的情况吗？你是否准备好迎接挑战？
